Nothotylenchus hexaglyphus Khan & Siddiqi, 1968

Hashemi, Kobra & Karegar, Akbar, 2020, New and known species of Nothotylenchus Thorne, 1941 (Nematoda: Anguinidae) from Iran with an updated list of species, Zootaxa 4729 (4), pp. 482-500 : 491

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4729.4.2

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:642E0816-A99F-4F7E-9690-190C590F05E8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3808669

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABB532-FFDD-FFFC-FF24-FB775D693FC8

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Nothotylenchus hexaglyphus Khan & Siddiqi, 1968
status

 

2. Nothotylenchus hexaglyphus Khan & Siddiqi, 1968

( Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 )

3 females: L = 751 ± 159 (568–851) µm; stylet = 7.3 ± 0.2 (7–7.5) µm; pharynx = 114 ± 11 (103–125) µm; tail = 55.6 ± 5.4 (50.5–61.5) µm; a = 35.7 ± 4.7 (31.9–41.0); b = 6.5 ± 0.9 (5.5–7.4); c = 13.5 ± 2.2 (11.2–15.5); c′ = 4.1 ± 0.4 (3.7–4.5); V = 82.8 ± 1.4 (81.6–84.3); V′ = 89.6 ± 0.4 (89.2–90.1); PUS/VBW = 1.1 ± 0.3 (0.8–1.3); PUS/V-A = 28.4 ± 7.3 (21.9–36.3) %; V-A/T = 1.3 ± 0.2 (1.1–1.5).

2 males: L = 683, 922 µm; stylet = 7, 7.5 µm; pharynx = 103, 157 µm; tail = 57, 64.5 µm; a = 41.9, 56.2; b = 6.6, 5.9; c = 12.0, 14.3; c′ = 4.5, 4.2; spicules = 21, 20.5 µm.

Diagnosis and relationships. Nothotylenchus hexaglyphus is characterised by its medium-sized body, six lateral field incisures, delicate stylet with very small knobs, pyriform or slightly elongated and offset or slightly overlapping basal pharyngeal bulb, posterior position of vulva, very short PUS, long spicules, and rounded tail terminus.

Studied populations of N. hexaglyphus are similar to N. affinis , N. geraerti , N. medians , N. taylori and N. tuberosus , and can be distinguished from all of these species by the very small stylet knobs ( Brzeski 1991). It differs from N. affinis , N. geraerti and N. medians by its longer spicules (20.5–21 vs. 15–17, 14–17.5 and 15–18 µm, respectively), and from N. taylori and N. tuberosus by smaller PUS/VBW ratio (0.8–1.3 vs. 1.8–3.0 and 2.0–2.4, respectively).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF