Synalpheus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.214608 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3501066 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AD87B2-FFA7-5D18-35C9-FC35FCF6FF62 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Synalpheus |
status |
|
Synalpheus View in CoL ul ( Ríos & Duffy, 2007)
( Figs. 6–8 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 )
Zuzalpheus ul Ríos & Duffy, 2007: 63 View Cited Treatment , pl. 5, figs. 27–30.
Material examined. 1 m, 30.X.2004, Camamu Bay, trawl, St. 4 (13°54’06”S; 39°00’22”W), MZUESC 709.
Distribution. Western Atlantic—Belize, Panama, Jamaica, Curaçao, Barbados and Brazil (state of Bahia , Camamu Bay) ( Hultgren et al. 2010, 2011; present study).
Ecological notes. The single specimen came up with a trawl, and its presumed sponge remains unknown. In the Caribbean Sea, S. ul is found in the canals of various demosponge from the genera Hymeniacidon Bowerbank, 1859 , Hyatella Férussac, 1821 , Lissodendoryx Topsent, 1892 , Spirastrella Schmidt, 1868 , Agelas Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 and Xestospongia de Laubenfels, 1932 ( Ríos & Duffy 2007; Macdonald et al. 2009; Hultgren et al. 2010, 2011).
Previous records. Camamu Bay [ Almeida et al. 2007b, as Synalpheus cf. pandionis , in part (lot MZUESC 709, erroneously referred to as ovigerous female, p. 16, figs. 3B, C, G, and p. 17, fig. 4)].
Remarks. Almeida et al. (2007b) reported S. cf. pandionis from Camamu Bay, Bahia , based on two specimens, thus extending the southern range of the S. pandionis complex. However, a reanalysis of this material following the publication of Ríos & Duffy (2007) revealed that neither of the two specimens of S. cf. pandionis represents S. pandionis s. str. One of them has all the diagnostic characters of S. ul, originally described from Belize and Panama ( Ríos & Duffy 2007). The scaphocerite of the Bahian specimen of S. ul has a distinct blade ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 G) similar to that of S. pandionis . However, it differs from S. pandionis in having unequal spiniform setae on the posterior margin of the telson, with the lateral pair being shorter than the mesial pair ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 D); these setae are subequal in length in S. pandionis . In S. ul, the distolateral tooth of the uropodal exopod is adjacent to the preceding spiniform seta ( Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 E, F) (vs. more separated and with a small lobe between them in S. pandionis ); and the mesial protuberance (erroneously referred as lateral side in Ríos & Duffy 2007) on the base of the major chela pollex, characteristic of S. pandionis , is absent ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 F). Synalpheus ul also resembles S. hoetjesi Hultgren, Macdonald & Duffy, 2010 , but differs from it by the presence of a scaphocerite blade (20–75% the length of scaphocerite vs. absent or vestigial in S. hoetjesi ) ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 G), the shape of the distal superior margin on the major chela (gently sloping in S. ul vs. bulging over the accessory tooth in S. hoetjesi ) ( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 A, B), and the thickness of the spiniform setae on the posterior margin of the telson (mesial subequal to lateral in S. ul vs. mesial larger than lateral in S. hoetjesi ). The present record of S. ul from Bahia , the first for Brazil and the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, significantly extends the southern range of this species.
MZUESC |
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Synalpheus
Almeida, Alexandre O., Boehs, Guisla, Araújo-Silva, Catarina L. & Bezerra, Luis Ernesto A. 2012 |