Rhinotorus Förster, 1869
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.235 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1A763AF4-A12F-4CCF-94CB-3981D29D7E55 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3854592 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ADBD19-5C2B-FFF0-4BE5-A5D0FAB5FCE2 |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 |
| status |
|
Key to species of the genus Rhinotorus Förster, 1869 View in CoL View at ENA
1. Metasoma entirely black, without any reddish colouration ( Figs 4E View Fig , 5E, I View Fig , 6D View Fig , 11A, C, D View Fig , 14 View Fig , 15C View Fig ), sometimes male tergites reddish or brownish centrally or on hind margins ...............................….. 2
– Metasoma partly distinctly reddish ( Figs 3E View Fig , 7E View Fig , 8B, E View Fig , 9 View Fig B–C, 10E, 12C, 13C) ............................. 6
2. Scutellum yellow ( Fig. 11C View Fig ). Face black a yellow spot above each clypeal fovea ( Fig. 11B View Fig ) ............ ......................................................................................................................... R. ovalis ( Davis, 1897) View in CoL
– Scutellum black ( Fig. 15D View Fig ). Female face black without yellow spots ( Figs 5A View Fig , 6A View Fig , 15A View Fig ) .............. 3
3. Female with each coxa darkly coloured. Male with only hind coxa black (the rest yellow) ( Figs 4E View Fig , 5I View Fig , 6D View Fig ). Hind tibia black apically and reddish-yellow basally ( Figs 4E View Fig , 5I View Fig , 6D View Fig ). Metasomal tergites 1–3 strongly punctate and with strong transverse impressions ( Figs 5E View Fig , 6C View Fig ) ................................... 4
– Each coxa yellowish-red ( Fig. 14 View Fig ). Hind tibia black basally and apically and yellow centrally ( Fig. 14 View Fig ). First and second metasomal tergites with weak transverse impressions, third metasomal tergite without impression, granulated and impunctate ( Fig. 15C View Fig ) .... R. umbrarum ( Holmgren, 1857) View in CoL
4. Face and mesopleuron shining and rather densely and distinctly punctate ( Fig. 5A, H View Fig ). Face and clypeus strongly projecting apically. Hind tibia entirely black ( Fig. 5I View Fig ) ............................................. .......................................................................................................... R. compactor (Thumberg, 1822) View in CoL
– Face and mesopleuron matt or weakly shining, shagreened and either impunctate or weakly punctate ( Figs 4A, D View Fig , 6 View Fig A–B). Face and clypeus weakly projecting. Hind tibia reddish basally ( Figs 6 View Fig D–E) .. ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
5. First metasomal tergite convex in profile. Male with mesoscutum and mesopleuron black ( Fig. 6B View Fig ). Parameres thin ........................................................................................................ R. jussilai sp. nov.
– First metasomal tergite flat in profile ( Fig. 4E View Fig ). Male with lateral lobes of mesoscutum and lower part of mesopleuron yellow ( Fig. 4D View Fig ). Parameres broad ( Fig. 4 View Fig B–C) .............. R. campester sp. nov.
6. Female face with yellow spots ( Fig. 12A View Fig ). Ramulus on the 1m-cu present ( Fig. 12C View Fig ). Propodeum with area basalis and area superomedia separated by carina ( Fig. 12B View Fig ). Hind wing with cu-a intercepted far below middle, almost at vein 1A ( Fig. 12C View Fig ) ......................................... R. similis ( Brischke, 1892) View in CoL
– Female face entirely black ( Figs 3A View Fig , 7D View Fig , 8C View Fig , 9A View Fig , 10A View Fig , 13A View Fig ). Ramulus absent ( Figs 3E View Fig , 8E View Fig , 9C View Fig ). Propodeum with area basalis and area superomedia continuous ( Figs 3C View Fig , 7C View Fig , 9B View Fig , 10C View Fig ). Hind wing with cu-a intercepted at or below middle but always distant from vein 1A ....................................... 7
7. First metasomal tergite not projecting at spiracles and gradually narrowing towards its base ( Fig. 10D View Fig ). Clypeus relatively thin and projecting ( Fig. 10A View Fig ) ......... R. nasutus ( Gravenhorst, 1829) View in CoL
– First metasomal tergite projecting at spiracles or strongly constricted basally ( Figs 7A View Fig , 9B View Fig ). Clypeus relatively wide and not projecting ( Figs 8C View Fig , 9A View Fig ) .............................................................................. 8
8. Scutellum yellow ( Fig. 7B View Fig ) ........................................................ R. leucostomus ( Gravenhorst, 1829) View in CoL – Scutellum black ( Fig. 8A View Fig ) ................................................................................................................. 9
9. Metasoma (excluding first metasomal tergite) reddish ( Fig. 8B View Fig ). Mesopleuron shining and distinctly punctate ................................................................................. R. longicornis ( Schmiedeknecht, 1914)
– Metasoma with central tergites reddish ( Figs 3E View Fig , 9B View Fig , 13C View Fig ). Mesopleuron coriaceous, matt, and impunctate ....................................................................................................................................... 10
10. Transverse impression of first and second metasomal tergites rather distinct ( Fig. 13C View Fig ). Hind femur 4.2 times as long as broad and with basal tarsomere of hind tarsus more stout (6 times as long as broad) ( Fig. 13D View Fig ) ................................................................................................ R. tarsilatus sp. nov.
– Transverse impression of first and second metasomal tergites weak ( Figs 3E View Fig , 9B View Fig ). Hind femur 5 times as long as broad and with basal tarsomere of hind tarsus more slender (9–12.5 times as long as broad) ( Figs 3E View Fig , 9C View Fig ) ........................................................................................................................ 11
11. Head roundish in anterior view ( Fig. 9A View Fig ). Transverse impression of first metasomal tergite clearly defined ( Fig. 9B View Fig ) .......................................................................... R. mesocostanus ( Thomson, 1894)
– Head diamond shaped in anterior ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Transverse impression of first metasomal tergite not defined ( Fig. 3E View Fig ) ......................................................................................... R. alpinus ( Roman, 1909)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.