Meta hongyuan, Wang & Irfan & Chen & Zhang, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.834.1905 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:508297E3-787B-4B87-8C51-FCB35BB1D652 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7019223 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/58FF42FD-1DF9-4525-9325-403E3809F8B7 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:58FF42FD-1DF9-4525-9325-403E3809F8B7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Meta hongyuan |
status |
sp. nov. |
Meta hongyuan sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:58FF42FD-1DF9-4525-9325-403E3809F8B7
Figs 1F–G View Fig , 10–12 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 22 View Fig
Differential diagnosis
The male of this new species resembles M. bowo sp. nov. ( Figs 2–4 View Fig View Fig View Fig ) in having the similar bifurcate metaine embolic apophysis and paracymbium of male palp, but can be distinguished by the following characters: cymbial ectobasal process U-shaped with a sharp pointed tip in ventral view and lacking a tooth-like process in M. hongyuan sp. nov. ( Figs 10B–C View Fig , 11B–D View Fig ), whereas oval with a tooth-like process and a depression on distal margin in M. bowo ( Figs 2B–C View Fig , 3B–D View Fig ); embolus long, arc-shaped and gradually narrowing towards tip in M. hongyuan sp. nov. ( Figs 10A View Fig , 11A View Fig ), whereas short and abruptly thin in M. bowo ( Figs 2A View Fig , 3A, E View Fig ). The female of M. hongyuan sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other congeners by the epigynal plate posteriorly with a distinct sclerotized depression and spermathecae brain-shaped ( Figs 10D–E View Fig , 12A–B View Fig ).
Etymology
The epithet refers to the type locality.
Type material
Holotype CHINA • ♂; Sichuan Province, Hongyuan County, Shuajingsi Town, Shuamalukou ; 31°57′41.23″ N, 102°38′12.03″ E; alt. 3189 m; 13 Oct. 2020; L.Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, J.X. Zhao and J.S. Luo leg.; SWUC- T-TEg-05-01 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes CHINA • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; SWUC-T-TEg-05-02 GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; SWUC-T-TEg-05-03–04 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype, Fig. 1F View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 5.03. Prosoma 2.46 long, 1.93 wide, opisthosoma 2.82 long, 2.28 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.17, ALE 0.18, PME 0.17, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.10, AME– ALE 0.13, PME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.16, ALE–PLE 0.03. MOA 0.45 long, front width 0.40, back width 0.45. Clypeus height 0.18.
CHELICERAE. Strong, with 3 promarginal and 4 retromarginal teeth.
LEG MEASUREMENTS. I = 12.18 (3.26, 4.22, 3.34, 1.36); II = 9.32 (2.56, 3.37, 2.36, 1.03); III = 5.31 (1.70, 1.61, 1.26, 0.74); IV = 6.97 (2.26, 2.20, 1.69, 0.82). Leg formula: 1243.
OPISTHOSOMA. Oval, with two pairs of sigillae. Both dorsum and venter white, with black markings.
PALP ( Figs 10A–C View Fig , 11A–D View Fig ). Cymbial ectobasal process simple, U-shaped with pointed end. Paracymbium finger-like, narrow towards tip, with sparse long hairs. Metaine embolic apophysis distal end broad, bifurcated, extending forward.
EMBOLUS. Long, arc-shaped, with curved tip. Conductor strong, arising meso-retrolaterally from bulb and extending clockwise, longer than wide, with membranous end.
Female (paratype SWUC-T-TEg-05-03, Fig. 1G View Fig )
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 6.17. Prosoma 2.39 long, 2.06 wide; opisthosoma 4.24 long, 3.85 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.17, ALE 0.18, PME 0.16, PLE 0.17; AME–AME 0.13, AME– ALE 0.16, PME–PME 0.12, PME–PLE 0.20, ALE–PLE 0.04. MOA 0.46 long, front width 0.44, back width 0.48. Clypeus height 0.23.
LEG MEASUREMENTS. I = 8.91 (2.46, 2.89, 2.40, 1.16); II = 7.43 (2.21, 2.53, 1.81, 0.88); III = 4.67 (1.50, 1.52, 1.00, 0.65); IV = 6.37 (2.04, 2.11, 1.52, 0.70). Leg formula: 1243. Other morphological characteristics same as in male.
EPIGYNE ( Figs 10D–E View Fig , 12A–B View Fig ). Posterior margin of epigynal plate with distinct sclerotized depression.
VULVA. Spermathecae brain-shaped. Fertilization ducts thick, S-shaped.
Distribution
China, Sichuan (Hongyuan) ( Fig. 22 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |