Anotylus coonoor, Makranczy, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.63.2.143.2017 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:671ADB82-5AA9-418A-BB5C-DB3B912D3BD2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E338657F-5B81-4B74-806A-E37D96F14C8F |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:E338657F-5B81-4B74-806A-E37D96F14C8F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anotylus coonoor |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anotylus coonoor View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs 57–63 View Figs 57–63 , 76 View Figs 76–77 , 265 View Figs 265–278 )
Typematerial – Holotype (m): INDIA: Madras [= TamilNadu], Nilgiri, Hulicalprèsde Coonoor [11°20’N, 76°46’E], surlarivedroitedeCoonoorriver, 1600 m, 22.XI.1972, leg. C. Besuchet, I. Löbl & R. Mussard (44), tamisagesenforêt, dansunravin ( MHNG); Para- types (2): samedataasholotype (1 m, NHMW); Madras, Nilgiri, 6 kmECoonoor, 1400 m, 22.XI.1972, leg. C. Besuchet, I. Löbl & R. Mussard (42), tamisagesenforêtprèsd‘unerivière (1 f, MHNG). GoogleMaps
Description – Measurements (in mm, n=3): HW = 0.76 (0.73–0.78); TW = 0.80 (0.76– 0.83); PW = 1.07 (0.99–1.14); EW = 1.13 (1.09–1.18); AW = 1.19 (1.13–1.25); HL = 0.59 (0.56– 0.62); EL = 0.15 (0.14–0.16); TL = 0.23 (0.20–0.25); PL = 0.62 (0.59–0.64); SC = 0.66 (0.62–0.70); FB = 1.96 (1.87–2.01); BL = 3.81 (3.68–4.00). Habitus as in Fig. 76 View Figs 76–77 . Forebody rather dull for densesculpture, abdomendenselypuncturedandweaklymicrosculptured, morelustrous. Headandfirstantennomeresblackishdarkbrown, restofbodyreddishdarkbrown, ante- riormarginofheadoftenlighter, reddish. Headwithanteriormarginpossessingmarked rim (weakerinmiddle), evenlyarchedbutslightlyangledatsupraantennalprominences, theseasmoderatelyelevatedobliqueridges, rimcontinuingposteriadalonginnerborder ofeyes, discslightlyimpressedbesideit. Epistomalsutureformingobsoletecircularimpression (sculptureinsidenotdiffering), uppersurfacewithtactilesetae (intratemporalis) situatedpostero-mediallyofeacheye. Eyesmedium-sizedandslightlybulging, indorsal viewtemples (1.5× lengthofeye) alatiform, laterallyroundedandposteriorlyconstricted toformdistinctneck, separatedbytransversaloccipitalfurrow. Antennomere 1 flattened club-shapedandstronglymicrosculptured, segment 2 basallybroadovoid, segment 3 clubshaped, segment 4 smallandslightlytransverse, segments 5–11 withbasaldishes, articles 6–10 transverse (about 1.4× broaderthanlong). Headandpronotumwithlacunosesculpture, inmidlineslightlytransitionaltocostulate. Pronotumwithlateralportionexplanate, edgealatiformwithverysparseshortsetae; lateralborderalmostevenlyarchedwiththin marginalridgeandanumberofsmall, irregularlydistributeddenticles, posteriormargin evenlyarched, posteriorcornersinconspicuous; discmediallywithtwoposteriorlyconfluentlongitudinalridges, slightlyimpressedalongsidethem, laterallysomewhatimpressed 0.13 mm for Fig. 58 View Figs 57–63
nearsidemargin. Elytrawithoutmembranousposteriormargin. Elytralepipleuralridge apparentasstrongersculpturelinesinlateralalatiformportions, discwithveryslightto noimpressionincentre; shoulderswelldeveloped, surfaceobscurelyfoveolate, elevations ofinterspacesconflentasshortlongitudinalridges. Legsshort, pro-andmesotibiawith severalspinuloserows, metatibiawithlongitudinalctenidiumofspinulesindistalhalf. Abdomenwithsidesmoderatelyarcuate, secondsegmentwithparatergitesbroadening posteriorly (abdomenslightlyconstrictedatbase), thoseofsegmentsIII–VIIthin, mesal paratergitesbroad; posterioredgeoftergiteVIIwiththinpalisadefringe, medianpartof sterniteVIIasinFig. 57 View Figs 57–63 , sterniteVIII ( Fig. 58 View Figs 57–63 ), tergitesIX ( Fig. 59 View Figs 57–63 ), X ( Fig. 60 View Figs 57–63 ) andaedeagus asinFigs 61–63 View Figs 57–63 , spermathecaasinFig. 265 View Figs 265–278 .
Etymology – ThenamederivesfromthepopulatedplaceCoonoornearthetypelocality (nouninapposition).
Distribution – OnlyknownfromasmallareainsouthernIndia.
Remarks – This species is most closely related to A. gunung , both with ratherconspicuous, dark, stoutanderecttactilesetaeonheadandpronotum.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |