Aysenoides terricola, RAMÍREZ, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2003)277<0001:TSSAAA>2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B38788-6455-8C07-5A9F-415E0186FD7D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aysenoides terricola |
status |
sp. nov. |
Aysenoides terricola View in CoL , new species Figure 27 View Fig
TYPES: Male holotype and female paratype from Chile, Región V, Valparaíso province, Cuesta Cavilolén, ca. 31°46̍S, 71°19̍W, in soil crevices, 6.XI.1988, P. Goloboff, E. Maury, C. Szumik, deposited in MACNAr 9808.
ETYMOLOGY: The specific name refers to the habitat where the types were collected.
DIAGNOSIS: Resembles A. colecole in body shape and genitalia, but can be distinguished by having curved elevations on the epigyne anterior of the spermathecae, and by a longer cusp of the paramedian apophysis on the primary conductor.
FEMALE (paratype, fig. 27A): Total length 4.55. Carapace length 2.03, width 1.08, wid er on leg II. Length of tibia/metatarsus: I, 1.02/0.91; II, 0.87/0.81; III, 0.58/0.66; IV, 1.00/0.77. Palpal tarsus length 0.41. Chelicerae with three teeth on retromargin, basal one largest. Sternum length 1.06, width 0.64. Spines: leg I, femur d 1–1–1, p d1ap; tibia v 2 2 0 2 (the xp1 x displaced prolaterally); metatarsus v 2–2–0 (the xp1 x displaced prolaterally). II, femur = I; tibia v 2 2 0 2, p 0–1; metatarsus v 2 r1–0. III, femur = I; tibia v r1ap or 0 p1 r1, p and r d1–1; metatarsus v 2–0–2 or r1–0–2, p and r 0 d1–1, d 2ap. IV, femur d 1–1–1; tibia v p1 p1–2; metatarsus v 2 p1–2, p and r 1ap, d r1ap. Leg III directed forward. Femora I–III narrow, IV strong. Abdomen (slightly bowed ventrally) length 2.50, width 1.07. Color: carapace grayish, legs pale gray with brownish violet spots, I and II darker. Leg coxae pale, endites, labium, and sternum dark. Abdomen brownish violet with yellow dorsal pattern, venter brownish violet uniform. Epigyne (fig. 27D, E): lateral lobes anteriorly curved, widely separate, closer posteriorly, limiting Tshaped median field. Limit between lateral lobes and median field unclear close to copulatory openings. Spermathecae spherical, copulatory ducts heavily sclerotized.
MALE (holotype): Total length 4.00. Carapace length 1.87, width 1.07. Length of tibia/metatarsus: I, 1.63/1.47; II, 1.13/1.17; III, 0.73/0.87; IV, 1.23/1.03. Chelicerae smaller than those of female. Sternum length 0.98, width 0.64. Spines as in female, except: leg I, tibia v 2–2–2, p 1 0 1 0. II, tibia p 1 d1 1 0; metatarsus v 2–2–0, p d1. III, tibia v 0 p1 r1; metatarsus v 2–2–2 or 2 r1–2. IV, femur r d1ap; tibia v p1–2–2 or p1 p1–2, r 1 d1 1 0; metatarsus p 0 d1–1, r d1 d1–1. Abdomen length 2.13, width 0.97, spiracle– epigastrium 1.10, spiracle–spinnerets 0.11. Color as in female. Palp (fig. 27B, C): tibia width/length 0.58, RTA long, sharp. Cymbium relatively small, globose, cymbial conductor wide. Tegulum basal. Sperm duct with two conspicuous loops at dorsal anterior margin, one at base of secondary conductor. Embolus with basal process long, narrow. Median apophysis retrolateral, long, sinuous. Primary conductor with basal portion hyaline, without canal, not fitted to embolus; apical portion long, heavily sclerotized, with long canal, connected to basal portion by thin translucent vertical lamina. Secondary conductor triangular, with acute apex and membranous ventral area. Paramedian apophysis apparently with two cusps, one retrolateral, triangular, flat, another ventral, on primary conductor, long, narrow.
VARIABILITY: Male spines: III, tibia v 0– 2–2.
NATURAL HISTORY: The types were collected in crevices on dry soil, in a steep ravine (Pablo Goloboff, personal commun.).
DISTRIBUTION: Central Chile, in Elqui and Valparaíso provinces.
OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED: CHILE: Región IV (Coquimbo): Elqui : 20 km N La Serena (Rt. 5 km 491), 120 m, 7.X.1992, N. Platnick, P. Goloboff, K. Catley , 13 ( AMNH). Región V (Valparaíso): Valparaíso: Same data as types, 3 immatures ( MACNAr) ; Viña del Mar , I.1979, A. Tobar, 13 3♀ 4 immatures ( AMNH) .
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.