Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5537.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7799C688-8554-4770-AAE6-80F322CE304C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14248135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B42964-0770-7008-DB97-CCABFE9F6DEC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939 |
status |
|
Microbrachida gilvicornis Bierig, 1939 View in CoL
( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1–5 )
Type material. Holotype deposited in FMNH ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1–5 ). Labels: 1) “Microbr./gilvicornis/Brg” [white label with submarginal green square, handwritten]; 2) “ La Caja , San. José /(Schmidt?)/ Costa Rica ” [white label, handwritten]; 3) “Field Mus. Nat. Hist./1966/ A. Bierig Colln./Acc. Z-13812" [white label, printed]; 4) “HOLOTYPE/teste A.Westrich2015/GDI Imaging Project” [purple label, printed]; 5) [unreadable, black label, handwritten?]; 6) “GENOTYPUS” [old yellow label, handwritten]; 7) “(QR Code)/FMNHINS/3048034/FIELD MUSEUM/Pinned” [white label, printed]; 8) “PHOTOGRAPHED/A. Westrich 2015/EMu Catalog” [blue label, printed].
Diagnosis. Microbrachida gilvicornis differs from M. perniciosae in having body rusty brown, with abdominal segments V to VI slightly darker; antennomeres with the same color; body with pubescence, more conspicuous on pronotum and elytra ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–5 ); tergum VIII with posterior margin emarginate ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–5 ).
Distribution. Costa Rica (San José: La Caja).
Remarks. Bierig (1939) questioned the sex of the specimen and suggested that the holotype is a female. Currently, it is not possible to determine its sex. According to Bierig (1939), Heinrich J. C. Schmidt collected the holotype in 1936.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |