Hemipsilichthys, EIGENMANN & EIGENMANN, 1889
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00229.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5744076 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B47718-FFCF-FFF8-1169-454BD70EE000 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Hemipsilichthys |
status |
|
HEMIPSILICHTHYS EIGENMANN & EIGENMANN View in CoL View at ENA
Xenomystus Lütken (1874) View in CoL : 217 (type species: Xenomystus gobio Lütken, 1874 by original designation. Name preoccupied in fishes by Xenomystus Günther, 1868 View in CoL as a subgenus of Notopterus View in CoL ).
Hemipsilichthys Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889: 46 View in CoL (type species: Xenomystus gobio Lütken, 1874 ; name in substitution to Xenomystus Lütken, 1874 View in CoL ).
Upsilodus Miranda Ribeiro, 1924: 365 (type species: Upsilodus victori Miranda Ribeiro, 1924 View in CoL by monotypy).
Diagnosis: No uniquely derived features were found to diagnose Hemipsilichthys . The following features are derived for Hemipsilichthys but are shared with a number of other loricariid groups: (1) anterior and posterior edges of hyohyal bone concave, making it spindle-shaped (character 21–0); (2) some of the bifid neural spines under the dorsal fin are perforated above the spinal cord (character 126–1); (3) adductor fossa of the pectoral girdle displaced laterally by the development of anterior and posterior rims of the fossa (character 152–1); and (4) ventral ridge of the pelvic basipterygium tall (a reversion, character 172–0).
In addition, Hemipsilichthys can be easily recognized by the combination of a high preadipose keel, formed by the azygous preadipose plates, almost symmetrically bifid teeth ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ) on premaxilla and dentary, small eye (orbital diameter 8.6–16.9% HL), and dorsal-fin membrane not or slightly extended posteriorly but never in contact with the first preadipose plate.
KEY TO SPECIES OF HEMIPSILICHTHYS
1. Dorsal series of plates reduced, with no plates between dorsal-fin origin and the end of the adipose fin; eye comparatively smaller (orbital diameter 8.6–11.8% HL); dorsal-fin spinelet absent..................................... ................................................... Hemipsilichthys papillatus View in CoL (Rio Preto basin, Rio Paraíba do Sul drainage)
1′. Dorsal series of plates complete, with plates between head and caudal peduncle; eye comparatively larger (orbital diameter 12.0–16.9% HL); dorsal-fin spinelet present ...................................................................... 2
2. Dorsal fin with seven branched rays; papillae in upper lip forming transversely elongate skin folds; eye comparatively smaller (orbital diameter 12.0–14.7% HL); dorsal-fin spinelet rectangular or oval-shaped ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ) ................................................................................. Hemipsilichthys gobio View in CoL (Rio Paraíba do Sul basin)
2′. Dorsal fin with eight (rarely seven or nine) branched rays; papillae in upper lip transversely elongate but not fused to form skin folds; eye comparatively larger (orbital diameter 15.3–16.9% HL); dorsal-fin spinelet V-shaped ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ) ........................................... Hemipsilichthys nimius View in CoL (Rio Perequê-Açu and Taquari basins)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Delturinae |
Hemipsilichthys
Reis, Roberto E., Pereira, Edson H. L. & Armbruster, Jonathan W. 2006 |
Hemipsilichthys
Eigenmann C & Eigenmann RH 1889: 46 |