Paraphasma minus Redtenbacher, 1906

Chiquetto-Machado, Pedro I., Morales, Adriana C. & Cancello, Eliana M., 2022, Taxonomic revision of Paraphasma Redtenbacher, 1906 (Phasmatodea, Pseudophasmatidae) based on phallic and external morphology, Zootaxa 5122 (1), pp. 1-80 : 38-40

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5122.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC13A69D-D6FA-4926-AC59-648A5626C9B9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10718245

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B587AA-FFF0-FFEF-FF2A-FBF1FBDFF158

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paraphasma minus Redtenbacher, 1906
status

 

Paraphasma minus Redtenbacher, 1906 View in CoL

Figs 26–29 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29 , Table 6 View TABLE 6 .

Paraphasma minus Redtenbacher, 1906: 116 View in CoL ; Brock, 1998a: 43; Zompro, 2004: 159; Otte & Brock, 2005: 252; ChiquettoMachado & Cancello, 2021: 4, 26, figs 6, 25, 26. Holotype: ♀, Alto Amazonas (NHMW) ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 ).

Diagnosis. Similar to P. conspersum , P. indistinctum sp. nov., P. laterale , P. marginale and P. sooretama sp. nov., but clearly distinguishable by the phallic organ, with a “large type” sclerite of the ventral lobe ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 , in green), which has a somewhat acuminate posterior margin (roughly triangular in dorsal view) and three blunt, undivided, well-developed protuberances ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : ap, lp, rp). Although not exclusive of P. minus , the following features may also be useful for the identification of this species: small body length [♂ <44 mm (n = 2); ♀ = 52.2 mm (holotype)], corresponding to the smallest species in the genus; tegmina with gently rounded margins ( Figs 26D,E View FIGURE 26 , 29C View FIGURE 29 ); female lacking a distinctly raised anterodorsal carina on the profemur; male cerci with spatulate apex ( Fig. 27A–D View FIGURE 27 ); vomer longer than wide ( Fig. 27E View FIGURE 27 ); male subgenital plate with posterolateral margins forming a pair of approximately triangular expansions with malleable aspect ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 : arrows); female sternite VII with a rounded indentation on the posterior margin.

Redescription of male. Color ( Figs 26 View FIGURE 26 , 27 View FIGURE 27 ): Body mostly brown, grayish or black, with a pair of pale yellowish or greenish lateral stripes extending along head, prothorax, mesothorax and costal region of tegmina and hindwings. Head dorsally black with pale yellow longitudinal stripes. Pro- and mesonotum with fairly dense pale yellow spots and dorsomedian line in the same yellow shade. Legs brown; darker in apical region of femora and tibiae. Tegmina and costal region of hindwings mostly brown or grayish, with pale yellow venation. Body ventrally brown. Head, thorax and legs ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum . Wings ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ): Tegmina short, not reaching median region of metanotum; in dorsal view about 2.5x longer than wide; posterior and apical margins gently rounded; shoulder pad varying from dull protuberance to sharp spine; anal region with conspicuous reticulate venation. Hindwing reaching abdominal tergite VII. Abdomen ( Figs 26A–C View FIGURE 26 , 27 View FIGURE 27 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum , except for the following: apex of cerci with sinuous margin in lateral view ( Fig. 27B View FIGURE 27 ); vomer gradually narrowing towards apical region ( Fig. 27E View FIGURE 27 ). Phallic organ ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 ): Dorsal sclerite wider than long, roughly rectangular in dorsal view ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 , in red); distal process short and relatively wide, directed to the left, almost perpendicular in relation to longitudinal axis of organ ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : dp). Dorsal and ventral lobes partially fused on left side. Dorsal lobe ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : dl) subdivided into main body on the right and a digitiform, smaller dorsal pouch on the left ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : asterisks). Sclerite of the ventral lobe of “large type ” ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 , in green), covering entire inner face of ventral lobe and slightly extending to outer face posteriorly; roughly triangular in dorsal view, with somewhat acuminate posterior margin; apical, left basal and right basal protuberances well-developed, blunt and undivided ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 : ap, lp, rp). One of base apodemes ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 , in blue) projecting into dorsal lobe as a distinct spatulate expansion.

Redescription of female. Color ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 ): As in male. Head and thorax ( Fig. 29A–C View FIGURE 29 ): As in male. Legs ( Fig. 29A–C View FIGURE 29 ): As in male, but slightly shorter in relation to body. Wings ( Fig. 29A–C View FIGURE 29 ): As in male, but hindwing reaching or surpassing abdominal tergite VIII. Abdomen ( Fig. 29A,B,E–G View FIGURE 29 ): As in Paraphasma conspersum .

Egg not examined.

Distribution ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 : light blue circles). Paraphasma minus is recorded from the Brazilian Amazon. The type locality “Alto Amazonas ” is vague, but possibly refers to the Solimões River (see “Remarks” below). In addition to the holotype, only two other specimens of P. minus are known, from Manaus (eastern Amazonas state) and Paru River (north-central Pará).

Remarks. The type material of Paraphasma minus is restricted to a single female. For this reason, the identification of the two males housed at MZUSP and MNRJ could not be based on the morphology of the phallic organ. Although the females of P. minus , P. indistinctum sp. nov., P. conspersum , P. laterale , P. marginale and P. sooretama sp. nov. do not show clear differences of external morphology, it is reasonable to infer that these two males are conspecific with the holotype of P. minus based on their collecting localities and on the fact that the female holotype and these males correspond to the smallest representatives of Paraphasma examined by us (in comparison with specimens of the same sex). Hence, the male of P. minus is described here for the first time.

It is possible that the type locality of P. minus (“Alto Amazonas ” = Upper Amazonas) corresponds to the Solimões River, in which case it would be situated further west in the Amazon Forest than the localities of the two males [the old Upper Amazonas Basin is nowadays known as the Solimões Basin—see Caputo (1984) and Silva et al. (2003)]. This hypothesis is corroborated by the fact that the collecting locality of the lectotype of Agrostia bipunctata Redtenbacher, 1906 ( Phasmatodea : Pseudophasmatidae ) is “Alto Amazonas, Coary” and, like the holotype of P. minus , this specimen was acquired from the natural history dealer Otto Staudinger. The city of Coari (Amazonas) is located on the banks of the Solimões River, suggesting that the type locality of P. minus may also refer to this river.

Additional material examined. BRAZIL. Amazonas: 1♂, Manaus, Dom Pedro , 4.vi.2014, Coleta manual, L. Oliveira Junior ( MZUSP 0287 View Materials *) . Pará: 1♂, Rio Paru , vii.52, J.C. M.C. ( MNRJ *) .

MNRJ

Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Cristovao, Universidade do Rio Janeiro, Museu Nacional

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Phasmida

Family

Pseudophasmatidae

Genus

Paraphasma

Loc

Paraphasma minus Redtenbacher, 1906

Chiquetto-Machado, Pedro I., Morales, Adriana C. & Cancello, Eliana M. 2022
2022
Loc

Paraphasma minus

Otte, D. & Brock, P. D. 2005: 252
Zompro, O. 2004: 159
Brock, P. D. 1998: 43
Redtenbacher, J. 1906: 116
1906
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF