Aneflomorpha
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7399054 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08BF4EE0-E69C-4E09-BECA-26481D49BFDE |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7399379 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887C8-FFC0-FFED-FF45-0BD5FA219443 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Aneflomorpha |
| status |
|
Illustrated Key to Species of Aneflomorpha View in CoL from the United States
This genus, perhaps more than any other in the United States, is nearly lacking in distinctive external features that allow for easy identification. Specimens need to be clean, relatively fresh without rubbed setae, and mounted well with legs and antennae not obscuring other structures. Even then, this key will not work for every specimen. Due to intraspecific variation, mutations, possible hybrids, or undocumented species, a few specimens will, unfortunately, remain indeterminate. However, for nearly all specimens, this will be the most useful tool since the genus was proposed over 100 years ago.
1. Base of elytra and/or pronotum with primarily suberect or erect setae (recumbent setae, if present, very fine, rarely recurved, and not obscuring surface) ( Fig. 19a View Figure 19 )................................. 2
— Base of elytra and/or pronotum with primarily recumbent, recurved setae or a nearly even mixture of erect, suberect, and recumbent setae ( Fig. 19b View Figure 19 )........................................... 7 2(1). Antennal carinae pronounced on basal antennomeres ( Fig. 20b View Figure 20 )................................ 3
— Antennal carinae absent or indistinct on basal antennomeres ( Fig. 20a View Figure 20 )......................... 4
3(2). Elytral setae erect and suberect, of differing lengths ( Fig. 21a View Figure 21 ). Protibia not flattened laterally and not carinate dorsally (e.g., Fig. 11h View Figure 11 ). Spine of antennomere three acute ( Fig. 21b View Figure 21 ); fourth antennomere usually dentiform. Elytral apices subtruncate or rounded apicolaterally to dentate suture ( Fig. 8u View Figure 8 ). Known only from western Texas and southern New Mexico ....... Aneflomorpha texana Linsley View in CoL
— Elytra with only erect setae of nearly uniform length ( Fig. 21d View Figure 21 ). Protibia flattened laterally and carinate dorsally ( Fig. 21c View Figure 21 ). Spine of antennomere three blunt or subacute ( Fig. 21e View Figure 21 ); fourth antennomere acutely spinose. Elytral apices bidentate to weakly bispinose ( Fig. 8i View Figure 8 ). Known only from southeast Arizona ................................................ Aneflomorpha linsleyae Chemsak View in CoL
4(2). Spine of third antennomere acute at apex ( Fig. 22a View Figure 22 ). Known from throughout the eastern United States west to Texas and Oklahoma ........................................................... 6
— Spine of third antennomere blunt at apex ( Fig. 22b View Figure 22 )........................................... 5
5(4). Elytra with erect setae only (no recumbent setae) ( Fig. 23a View Figure 23 ); setae mostly fine and translucent. Procoxal cavities widely open posteriorly. Fourth antennomere moderately spinose ( Fig. 23b View Figure 23 ). Known from Florida and Georgia......................... Aneflomorpha delongi (Champlain and Knull) View in CoL
— Elytra with dense erect and suberect setae in addition to recumbent setae ( Fig. 23b View Figure 23 ); setae white. Procoxal cavities closed or nearly closed posteriorly. Fourth antennomere dentiform or weakly spinose ( Fig. 23d View Figure 23 ). Known from Texas and northern Mexico.......... Aneflomorpha tenuis (LeConte) View in CoL
6(4). Pronotal punctures dense, mostly of uniform size, contiguous, and larger than those of elytral base; pronotum usually lacking impunctate callus at middle ( Fig. 24a View Figure 24 ). Elytral apicolateral spine ( Fig. 8r View Figure 8 ) usually subequal to sutural spine. Spine of third antennomere ( Fig. 9q View Figure 9 ) usually less than 1.5 times length of second antennomere, with apex curved back toward antenna. Scutellum usually finely golden pubescent. Known from the eastern and central United States to Texas and Oklahoma ...................................................... Aneflomorpha subpubescens (LeConte) View in CoL
— Pronotal punctures dense, of differing size (mostly about the same size as those at the base of the elytra), some contiguous and some separate; pronotum usually with central or post-median impunctate callus ( Fig. 24b View Figure 24 ). Elytral apicolateral spine ( Fig. 8a View Figure 8 ) usually distinctly longer than sutural spine. Spine of third antennomere ( Fig. 9a View Figure 9 ) usually longer than 1.5 times length of second antennomere (often twice as long) and straight at apex. Scutellum usually densely ochraceous pubescent. Known only from Texas, Oklahoma, and southwest Missouri ............ Aneflomorpha aculeata (LeConte) View in CoL
7(1). Spine of third antennomere blunt at apex ( Fig. 25a, b View Figure 25 )......................................... 8
— Spine of third antennomere acute or subacute at apex (e.g., Fig. 22a View Figure 22 , 31b View Figure 31 )........................ 9
8(7). Spine of third antennomere nearly half length of antennomere ( Fig. 25a View Figure 25 ); procoxal cavities closed ( Fig. 10u View Figure 10 ); pronotum usually with a distinct, narrow, elongate callus at middle ( Fig. 25c View Figure 25 ); elytra with dense erect and suberect setae in addition to recumbent setae ( Fig. 7u View Figure 7 ). Longer than 13 mm (average 15 mm). Known only from Texas and adjacent Mexico......... Aneflomorpha tenuis (LeConte) View in CoL
— Spine of third antennomere usually less than one-third length of antennomere ( Fig. 25b View Figure 25 ); procoxal cavities open ( Fig. 10c View Figure 10 ); pronotum with a small and poorly defined central callus or none ( Fig. 25d View Figure 25 ); elytra with very few erect setae and mostly recumbent setae present ( Fig. 7c View Figure 7 ). Shorter than 14 mm (average 10 mm). Known only from Arizona and adjacent Mexico (note that this species keys out twice due to a few specimens having a subacute spine on third antennomere)......................................................................... Aneflomorpha cazieri Chemsak View in CoL
9(7). Protibia lacking a dorsal carina at base and not very laterally flattened ( Fig. 26c, d View Figure 26 ); dorsal margin straight, narrower at base and gradually expanded toward apex............................. 10
— Protibia with a dorsal carina at base and strongly laterally flattened ( Fig. 26a, b View Figure 26 ); dorsal margin weakly sinuate; thicker at base, slightly narrowed at middle, and straight to weakly expanded toward apex ................................................................................... 18
10(9). Flagellomeres of antennae distinctly paler than scape and dorsal body integument ( Fig. 27a View Figure 27 )...... 11
— Flagellomeres of antennae similar in color to scape and dorsal body integument ( Fig. 27b View Figure 27 )........ 12
11(10). Spine of third antennomere shorter than second antennomere ( Fig. 9g View Figure 9 ). Testaceous head, thorax, and elytra. Base of femora slightly paler than apex. Elytra only slightly darker than antennal flagellomeres ( Fig. 28a View Figure 28 ).............................................. Aneflomorpha gilana Casey View in CoL
— Spine of third antennomere subequal to or longer than second antennomere ( Fig. 9j View Figure 9 ). Dark brown head, thorax, and elytra. Base of femora much paler than apex. Elytra much darker than antennal flagellomeres ( Fig. 28b View Figure 28 )...................................... Aneflomorpha luteicornis Linsley View in CoL
12(10). Elytral apices with well-developed sutural extension or spine and rounded or dentiform apicolaterally ( Fig. 29a View Figure 29 ) (if appearing bispinose, sutural spine much longer than apicolateral spine); specimens usually longer than 14 mm ........................................................... 13
— Elytral apices truncate, bidentate or weakly, symmetrically bispinose ( Fig. 29b View Figure 29 ); size variable but often less than 15 mm .................................................................... 14
13(12). Short, suberect setae abundant on at least base of elytra. Basal half of antennae with long recumbent setae; apical half with only dense vestiture of very short pubescence. Antennomeres 3 and 4 not mesally carinate ( Fig. 30b View Figure 30 ). Elytra dentiform apicolaterally to having a spine nearly half length of sutural spine ( Fig. 30a View Figure 30 ). Known only from western and southern Texas ................................................................................... Aneflomorpha fisheri Linsley View in CoL
— Suberect setae nearly absent from elytra. Pubescence of antennae more uniform on basal and apical antennomeres. Antennomeres 3 and 4 mesally carinate ( Fig. 30d View Figure 30 ). Elytra rounded apicolaterally and projecting much less than half length of sutural spine ( Fig. 30c View Figure 30 ). Known only from southern Arizona and adjacent Mexico...................................... Aneflomorpha unispinosa Casey View in CoL
14(12). Basal antennomeres (3 and 4, at least) without conspicuous carina ( Fig. 31a View Figure 31 ).................... 15
— Basal antennomeres (3 and 4, at least) with a conspicuous carina ( Fig. 31b View Figure 31 )..................... 16
15(14). Spine of antennomere three either blunt or subacute, or bent at apex ( Fig. 32b View Figure 32 ). Pronotal punctures mostly uniform in size and shape, surface not semi-rugose ( Fig. 32c View Figure 32 ); pronotum distinctly longer than wide. Antennae of males extending beyond elytral apices by more than two antennomeres. Size often less than 13 mm. Known only from southern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico and adjacent Mexico.................................................. Aneflomorpha cazieri Chemsak View in CoL
— Spine of antennomere three acute ( Fig. 32a View Figure 32 ). Pronotal punctures variable in size and shape, variably merging with one another creating an uneven surface ( Fig. 32d View Figure 32 ); pronotum about as long as broad. Antennae not extending beyond elytral apices by more than two antennomeres. Size usually greater than 13 mm. Known only from Texas ........................ Aneflomorpha seminuda Casey View in CoL
16(14). Moderate to large species (most specimens longer than 13 mm). Elytral apices usually moderately dentiform to weakly bispinose ( Fig. 33a View Figure 33 ). Antennal carinae pronounced on most antennomeres ( Fig. 9o View Figure 9 )........................................................ Aneflomorpha rectilinea Casey View in CoL
— Small species (nearly all specimens shorter than 13 mm). Elytral apices truncate to very weakly bidentate ( Fig. 33b View Figure 33 ). Antennal carinae typically not well developed on most antennomeres ( Fig. 9k View Figure 9 )..... 17
17(16). Legs distinctly pale rufous and contrasting from most of testaceous pro- and mesothorax venter and piceous abdomen ( Fig. 34c View Figure 34 ); pronotum usually with shiny, narrow impunctate post-median callus ( Fig. 5l View Figure 5 ); gular region densely punctate to posterior margin of lower eye lobes ( Fig. 34c View Figure 34 ); anterior margin of mesosternum divided ( Fig. 34d View Figure 34 ). Known only from Baboquivari and Santa Rita Mountains and points between in Arizona ................................. Aneflomorpha minuta Chemsak View in CoL
— Legs testaceous, not contrasting much from ventral integument color of pro- and mesothorax ( Fig. 34a View Figure 34 ); pronotum with, at most, ill-defined matte impunctate callus ( Fig. 5e View Figure 5 ); gular region with fewer punctures and semi-rugose integument ( Fig. 34a View Figure 34 ); anterior margin of mesosternum undivided ( Fig. 34b View Figure 34 ). Known only from Huachuca Mountains in Arizona ..................................................................................... Aneflomorpha crypta Lingafelter View in CoL , new species
18(9). Pubescence relatively dense and white over much of the dorsal and ventral surface and particularly dense on the scutellum, inner eye margins, metasternum, and basal sternites ( Fig. 3f View Figure 3 ); many dorsal elytral setae slightly thickened at middle. Pronotum usually without an impunctate callus and with most punctures hidden under dense setae ( Fig. 35a View Figure 35 ). Known only from riparian areas below 200 meters in southwest Arizona ................. Aneflomorpha yumae Giesbert and Hovore View in CoL , new status
— Pubescence relatively sparse, thin, translucent or white over much of the dorsal and ventral surface ( Fig. 1i View Figure 1 ). Pronotum usually with a small, impunctate posteromedian callus and mostly exposed punctures ( Fig. 35b View Figure 35 ). Primarily distributed in mountainous regions above 1000 meters................. 19 19(18). Usually uniformly pale rufous (basal sternites sometimes partially piceous) ( Fig. 1i View Figure 1 , 15d View Figure 15 ); apex of prosternal process usually rounded and very slightly expanded ( Fig. 36a View Figure 36 ); usually very few erect elytral setae ( Fig. 7i, o View Figure 7 ); elytral apices usually weakly bidentate ( Fig. 8h, n View Figure 8 ); aedeagus with parameres asymmetrically narrowed apically and median lobe more broadly rounded at apex ( Fig. 36e View Figure 36 ); anterior collar of mesosternum nearly divided at middle ( Fig. 36b View Figure 36 ).... Aneflomorpha linearis (LeConte) View in CoL
— Usually testaceous or brunneous ( Fig. 2e View Figure 2 , 15g View Figure 15 ); apex of prosternal process usually moderately expanded ( Fig. 36d View Figure 36 ); more abundant erect setae on elytra ( Fig. 7p View Figure 7 ); elytral apices usually strongly bidentate to moderately bispinose ( Fig. 8m View Figure 8 ); aedeagus with parameres evenly and symmetrically rounded at apex and median lobe more narrowly constricted at apex ( Fig. 36f View Figure 36 ); anterior collar of mesosternum indented but not nearly divided at middle ( Fig. 36c View Figure 36 )............................................................................... Aneflomorpha paralinearis Lingafelter View in CoL , new species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.