Aneflomorpha texana Linsley, 1936
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7399054 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08BF4EE0-E69C-4E09-BECA-26481D49BFDE |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7470062 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B887C8-FFDD-FFF4-FF45-0968FAAF95C0 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Aneflomorpha texana Linsley |
| status |
|
Aneflomorpha texana Linsley View in CoL
( Fig. 3c, d View Figure 3 , 6w View Figure 6 , 7w View Figure 7 , 8u View Figure 8 , 9t View Figure 9 , 10w View Figure 10 )
Aneflomorpha texana Linsley 1936: 473 View in CoL . Synonym of seminuda Casey, 1912 View in CoL by Linsley (1963: 51). New status. Aneflomorpha werneri Chemsak 1962: 106 View in CoL . New synonym.
Diagnosis. Length 10–17 mm, pronotum averages 1.17 times longer than wide, elytra together average 3.10 times longer than wide ( Fig. 3c, d View Figure 3 ). Integument light rufous. Antennae carinate ( Fig. 9t View Figure 9 ). Spine of third antennomere about as long or a little longer than second antennomere, projecting away from antennal plane by less than 40 degrees, acute at apex ( Fig. 9t View Figure 9 ); fourth antennomere usually dentiform or rarely with small spine. Pronotum with small, closely placed punctures, mostly unobscured by suberect and erect setae, usually with small to moderatesized impunctate, post-median callus ( Fig. 6w View Figure 6 ). Elytral apices unevenly rounded apicolaterally, subtruncate to weakly bidentate ( Fig. 8u View Figure 8 ). Elytral pubescence fine and translucent or golden, mostly straight, erect and suberect at base, but with some straight, semi-recumbent setae and very few recurved, recumbent setae ( Fig. 7w View Figure 7 ). Procoxal cavities open by less than half the width of the broadly expanded prosternal process ( Fig. 10w View Figure 10 ). Protibia slender, gradually widening apically with the dorsal margin straight and non-carinate (as in Fig. 11h View Figure 11 ).
Discussion. The holotype of A. texana Linsley was examined ( Fig. 3c View Figure 3 ) and found to be conspecific with A. werneri Chemsak. The holotype of A. texana has distinct antennal carinae, lacks spines on the elytral apices, and lacks appressed setae on the pronotum unlike the holotype of A. seminuda ( Fig. 2i View Figure 2 ) which it was considered closely related to ( Chemsak 1962) and placed in synonymy by Linsley (1963). The only feature somewhat atypical of some populations is that the spine of antennomere four is more prominent in the holotype of A. texana than in some other specimens. Aneflomorpha werneri is therefore considered a new synonym of A. texana . The mostly suberect setae of the pronotum and elytral base in A. texana (and near absence of recurved, recumbent setae) and presence of a basal antennal carina distinguishes it most easily from A. seminuda which has mostly recurved, recumbent pubescence with few erect setae ( Fig. 7s View Figure 7 ) and lacks a distinct carina on the basal antennomeres ( Fig. 9p View Figure 9 ).
The combination of distinctive light rufous coloration, rounded or weakly dentate apical margin of the elytra, pronotum with small to moderately developed impunctate central callus, moderate antennal carina, reduced spine on the fourth antennomere, and setae on the pronotum and the base of the elytra being erect, suberect and straight (not recurved and recumbent) as in most Aneflomorpha , aid in making this species distinctive. Due to the rufous coloration, erect pubescence, and size, this species is similar to A. aculeata . That species differs in having an apicolateral spine on the elytra ( Fig. 8a View Figure 8 ) and in having recurved, recumbent setae in addition to the straight erect and suberect setae on the elytra ( Fig. 7a View Figure 7 ). From the less common rufous forms of A. tenuis , A. texana can be most easily distinguished by having a shorter, acute spine on antennomere three ( Fig. 9t View Figure 9 ) as opposed to the long, blunt spine in A. tenuis ( Fig. 9r View Figure 9 ). From A. opacicornis (transferred to Neaneflus herein), A. texana is distinguished by having the pronotal and basal elytral setae as described ( Fig. 6w View Figure 6 ; 7w View Figure 7 ) unlike the recurved, recumbent setae in A. opacicornis ( Fig. 6m View Figure 6 , 7m View Figure 7 ). Further, A. texana has a more elongate pronotum with straight or less rounded sides ( Fig. 6w View Figure 6 ) unlike A. opacicornis which has the pronotum slightly wider than long and broadly rounded at the sides and constricted basally ( Fig. 6m View Figure 6 ). That species is further distinguished by having more rounded outer apical elytral apices ( Fig. 8l View Figure 8 , 17e, f View Figure 17 ).
Distribution and Biology. This species was previously known only from western Texas ( Linsley 1936; Chemsak 1962; Linsley 1963). Specimens examined from New Mexico represent a new state record for A. texana in the United States and Coahuila represents a new state record and southernmost distribution for Mexico.
Material examined. Mexico: Coahuila (new state record): Sierra de los Burros , 18 June 1938, Rollin Baker ( TAMU) ; USA: New Mexico (new state record): White’s City , 25 August 1958, H. V. Weems, Jr., at light (2, FSCA) ; Eddy Co., Cave National Park, 16 July 1993, Property of CAVE National Park ( CSUC) ; Eddy Co., Lincoln National Forest, Sitting Bull Canyon , 32°15′20″N, 104°41′50″W, 13 August 2003, uv light, E. Riley ( EGRC) GoogleMaps ; Eddy Co., Carlsbad National Monument, Rattlesnake Springs , 13–15 July 1968, D. G. Marqua (2, TAMU) ; Otero Co., 12 mi. W. Cloudcroft, Dry Canyon, Hg lt., 22 July 1989, Morris & Walker (3, RFMC) ; Texas: Mason Co., Stein Ranch, west of Castell , 14 June 1996, C. Wolfe and D. Marqua (2, TAMU) ; Kendall Co., Boerne , blacklight, June 2002, W. Seifert (3, TAMU) ; Presidio Co., Big Bend Ranch State Park, Leyva Campground , uv light, 29.4766°, −103.9461°, 17 July 2021, E. Riley (1, DJHC) ; Brewster Co., BBNP, Croton Springs , 29°20′24″N, 103°20′45″W, 3 August 2003, E. Riley (3, EGRC) GoogleMaps ; Brewster Co., Big Bend National Park, Chisos Mtns. , 4000′, Oak Canyon , 22 July 1967, Robert G. Beard, at light ( BTC) ; Brewster Co., Big Bend National Park, Panther Junction , 10 July 1982, R. S. Anderson ( TAMU) ; Brewster Co., Chisos Mtns. Basin , 29–31 July 1984, lights, M. E. Rice (4, TAMU) ; Brewster Co., Big Bend National Park, The Basin , 14 August 1969, Board and Hafernik (2, TAMU) ; Brewster Co., Big Bend National Park, Chisos Mountain Lodge , 1665 m, 29° 16.166′ N, 103° 18.153′ W, uv lights, 18 August 2015, S. W. Lingafelter ( USNM) GoogleMaps ; Brewster Co., Chisos Basin , 1 August 1991, D. W. Sundberg ( DJHC) ; Comanche Co., Proctor and nearby farms, 24 June 1970, J. W. Smith and A. R. Hardy ( TAMU) ; Erath Co., Stephenville , 28 June 1982, Charles W. Agnew ( TAMU) ; Jeff Davis Co., Terlingua Ranch, Alpine , 29.45247°, −103.39288°, 3768′, 23 July 2014, S. Lee, uv light trap (3, ASUC) ; Jeff Davis Co., Davis Mountains, Boy Scout Road (FM1832), 1270 m, 30° 48.433′ N, 103° 54.650′ W, 13 August 2015, mv/uv lights, S. W. Lingafelter (4, SWLC) GoogleMaps ; Kerrville , 4 May 1956, O. L. Cartwright ( USNM) ; Tom Green Co., Christoval at lights, 30 July 1989, R. Morris (2, RFMC) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Aneflomorpha texana Linsley
| Lingafelter, Steven W. 2022 |
Aneflomorpha texana Linsley 1936: 473
| Linsley EG 1963: 51 |
| Chemsak JA 1962: 106 |
| Linsley EG 1936: 473 |