Achrysocharoides platanoidae, Hansson, Christer & Shevtsova, Ekaterina, 2010

Hansson, Christer & Shevtsova, Ekaterina, 2010, Three new species of Achrysocharoides Girault (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitoids of Phyllonorycter spp. (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) on Acer platanoides and Robinia pseudoacacia, Zootaxa 2388, pp. 23-43 : 25-29

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.193825

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6202122

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B96142-6A1D-FFCA-3CC3-B850FEC8FD85

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Achrysocharoides platanoidae
status

sp. nov.

Achrysocharoides platanoidae sp. nov.

( Figs 1–12 View FIGURES 1 – 6 View FIGURES 7 – 12 , 49 View FIGURES 49 – 54. 49 – 50 , 63–64 View FIGURES 61 – 68 )

Diagnosis. Achrysocharoides platanoidae is similar to A. acerianus (Askew) but females differ in having the pedicel predominantly white to yellowish-white with base infuscate to brown ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49 – 54. 49 – 50 ) (predominantly to completely infuscate in A. acerianus , Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 54. 49 – 50 ), the hind coxa white with base infuscate to golden-green ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ) (basal third to half metallic in A. acerianus , Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ), and longer flagellomeres, e.g. flagellomeres 1–3 together 5.4X as long as wide ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ) as compared to 4.4X as long as wide in A. acerianus ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ). Males also differ in having longer flagellomeres, e.g. flagellomeres 1–4 together 9.4X as long as wide ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ) as compared to 8.5X as long as wide in A. acerianus ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ) and the hind coxa white with the base infuscate to golden-green ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ) (basal third to half metallic in A. acerianus , Fig. 24 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ).

Description. FEMALE. Length 1.1–1.6 mm.

Scape white; pedicel white to yellowish-white with base infuscate to brown; flagellum dark brown. Frons below frontal suture golden-green with blue tinges, above frontal suture metallic blue. Vertex metallic bluishgreen. Mesoscutum, scutellum and propodeum metallic bluish-green. Legs white, hind coxa with base infuscate to golden-green. Wings hyaline. Gaster metallic bluish-green.

Antenna as in Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61 – 68 . Frons with raised and strong reticulation, antennal scrobes smooth. Vertex inside ocellar triangle with raised and strong reticulation, outside ocellar triangle with raised and weak reticulation, partly smooth. Occipital margin rounded.

Mesoscutum with raised and strong reticulation; notauli as indistinct impressions in posterior 2/3. Scutellum with raised and strong reticulation, without scutellar pits. Dorsellum slightly convex, almost flat, and smooth. Propodeum smooth and shiny; propodeal callus with three setae. Forewing speculum closed below. Petiole conical without shoulders.

Ratios. HE/MS/WM = 3.2/1.0/1.6; POL/OOL/POO = 5.7/2.3/1.0; WH/WT = 1.2; LW/LM/HW = 1.8/1.0/ 1.2; PM/ST = 0.8; MM/LG = 0.8–0.9.

MALE. Length 1.3–1.7 mm.

Scape and pedicel yellowish-white; flagellum dark brown. Frons below level of toruli golden-green, above level of toruli metallic blue. Vertex golden-green. Mesoscutum and scutellum golden-green or metallic bluish-green. Propodeum metallic bluish-green. Legs white, hind coxa with base infuscate to golden-green. Wings hyaline. Gaster with first tergite with anterior 1/4 golden-green, posterior 3/4 dark brown, anteromedially with a large white spot; remaining tergites 3/4 dark brown.

Antenna as in Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61 – 68 . Frons below level of toruli smooth and shiny, between level of toruli and frontal suture with strong and transverse striae, above frontal suture medially with raised and rather weak reticulation and close to eyes smooth. Vertex inside ocellar triangle with engraved and weak reticulation, outside ocellar triangle predominantly smooth. Occipital margin rounded.

Mesoscutum with raised and strong reticulation; notauli as indistinct impressions in posterior 2/3. Scutellum with raised and strong reticulation, without scutellar pits. Dorsellum slightly convex, almost flat, and smooth. Propodeum smooth and shiny; propodeal callus with three setae. Forewing speculum closed below. Petiole conical without shoulders.

Ratios. HE/MS/WM = 1.8/1.0/1.1; POL/OOL/POO = 2.3/1.0/1.1; WH/WT = 1.3; LW/LM/HW = 1.9/1.0/ 1.3; PM/ST = 0.5; MM/LG = 0.9–1.1.

Distribution. Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Host. Phyllonorycter platanoidella (Joannis) ( Lepidoptera : Gracillariidae ) on Acer platanoides .

Material examined. Holotype female labeled SWEDEN: Skåne, Silvåkra, 55°41'N, 13°30'E, 26.vi.2007, C. Hansson & E. Shevtsova ( LUZM). Paratypes: 17 females 5 males with same label data as holotype ( BMNH, CH, LUZM, NHMV); 1 male from same locality as holotype but collected 17.x.1981 ( CH); 1 male “ SWEDEN: Skåne, Lake Kranke, Lottagården, 55°42'N, 13°29'E, 1.vii.2007, C. Hansson” ( CH); 5 females “ SWEDEN: Skåne, Torna Hällestad, 55°41'N, 13°25'E, 18.vii.1981, C. Hansson” ( CH, LUZM); 5 females, 1 male from same locality as previous but collected 16.x.1981 ( CH, BMNH); 7 females “ SWEDEN: Skåne, Dalby, 9.vii.1981, C. Hansson” ( CH, LUZM); 2 males “ SWEDEN: Skåne, Höör, Jularp, 22.vii.1979, C. Hansson” ( CH); 4 females 3 males “ UNITED KINGDOM: Berkshire, Ascot, Silwood Park [no date], C.L. Vaamonde” ( BMNH). All specimens are reared from Phyllonorycter platanoidella on Acer platanoides .

Identification. To include A. platanoidae in the latest key to European Achrysocharoides ( Bryan 1980) the following additions should be made for females:

6. Hind coxa white with basal 1/3 to1/2 metallic ............................................................................................................. 7 - Hind coxa white with only dorso-basal 1/5 metallic .................................................................................................. 7a 7. Scape white with inner-apical part pale brown; on Acer ................................................................. acerianus (Askew) - Entire scape white or yellowish-white; on Quercus ......................................................................... latreilleii (Curtis) 7a. Pedicel white to yellowish-white with base infuscate to brown ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49 – 54. 49 – 50 ).................................... platanoidae sp. nov. - Pedicel dark brown as flagellomeres .................................................................................................... butus (Walker)

and for males:

10. Scutellar pits absent and mesoscutum with strong reticulation ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 , 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )............................................................ 10a - Scutellar pits usually present (see fig. 1 in Bryan 1980), but if absent then mesoscutum with weak reticulation ... 11 10a. Flagellomeres 1–4 together 9.4X as long as wide ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ); hind coxa with dorso-basal 1/5 infuscate to metallic ( Fig. View FIGURES 7 – 12

12) ................................................................................................................................................. platanoidae sp. nov. - Flagellomeres 1–4 together 8.5X as long as wide ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61 – 68 ); hind coxa with basal 1/3 to 1/2 metallic ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 19 – 24 )...........

......................................................................................................................................................... acerianus (Askew) Etymology. Named after the host plant, Acer platanoides , of its lepidopteran host.

Remarks. Askew & Ruse (1974) mention some additional material under the treatment of A. acerianus , two males and eight females from Phyllonorycter acerifoliella (Zeller) on Acer campestre . These specimens were not included in the description of A. acerianus , and hence not included in the type material, but were nevertheless regarded as conspecific with A. acerianus . This material differed from “typical” A. acerianus in having completely pale hind coxae and slightly longer funicle segments. We were not able to examine these specimens but in view of the diagnostic characters given above, it is possible that they belong to A. platanoidae , or to a new species close to A. platanoidae .

The species cited as A. acerianus in Lopez-Vaamonde et al. (2005) is actually A. platanoidae , and the gene sequences accounted for in that paper, and deposited in GeneBank, concern A. platanoidae not A. acerianus .

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF