Palaeotinca sp. 1
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13643922 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B987C7-FFF1-3C24-FCBF-0F6EFDA47EB6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Palaeotinca sp. 1 |
status |
|
Fig. 28 View Fig .
1996 “genus Cyprinidarum” sp.; Reichenbacher and Mödden 1996: 91, pl. 1: A–M.
2004 cf. Tarsichthys sp. ; Reichenbacher 2004, pro parte: 118, pl. 3: 1–2.
Material, dimensions and stratigraphic range.—See Tables 1 and 4, and Fig. 32 View Fig .
Description.—The general shape, the prominent anterolateral and anteromedial edges, the well developed mineralization area, and the cranial umbo make these lapilli similar to Palaeotinca moeddeni sp. nov., but the concavity of the posterior margin is absent, the medial margin is more or less straight, and the most thickened portion lies anteriorly. However, there is some similarity to Tinca micropygoptera from the Steinheim Basin (see Gaudant 1989, here Fig. 29 View Fig ).
Remarks.—The numerous pharyngeal fish teeth from St. Donat all belong to the genus Palaeotinca (det. Jean Gaudant and Madelaine Böhme) and support our attribution of the otoliths. These teeth were erroneously mentioned as Tarsichthys in Reichenbacher (2004). No fish teeth were available from Göllheim.
Palaeotinca sp. 1 reveals a rather high variability in both localities. Some specimens are wider and reveal a more trapezoid posterior portion instead of the pointed posterior end (e.g., Fig. 28A, B View Fig ). However, intermediate forms are also present and thus we do not separate these morphotypes. The observed variability may relate to the brackish conditions and shifting salinities in both localities.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.