Parahelice daviei ( Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4728.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E2493FB9-5082-40A5-9408-54F3645D53C3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BB87E9-A045-F64C-FF54-FD2B22D5FC2B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Parahelice daviei ( Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006 ) |
status |
|
Parahelice daviei ( Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006) View in CoL
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 2 View FIGURE 2 )
Pseudohelice (Parahelice) daviei Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006: 48 View in CoL , figs. 66, 68, 77, 78 (type locality: Irian Jaja, Papua, Indonesia).
Parahelice daviei — Ng et al. 2008: 227 View in CoL (list); Nishigaki et al. 2011: 86, figs. 1A–D, 2F (part?) (Ishigaki, Japan).
Parahelice pilimana — Nishigaki et al. 2011: 88 View in CoL (part), fig. 2F (Ishigaki, Japan). Not Par. pilimana (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873) View in CoL .
Pseudohelice subquadrata — Li & Chiu 2013 View in CoL : upper right image on p. 61. Not Pse. subquadrata (Dana, 1851) View in CoL .
Material examined. Taiwan: 1 ♂ (8.1 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15715), Lanyang R. estuary, Yilan, coll. P.-Y. Hsu, 15 Apr. 2018 ; 1 ♀ (13.2 mm) ( NMMBCD 4049 ), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 25 Mar 2014 ; 1 ♂ (9.9 mm), 1 ♀ (12.4 mm) ( NMMBCD 4046 ), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 28 Mar. 2014 ; 2 ♂♂ (9.7–10.9 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15682), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 23 June 2016 ; 2 ♂♂ (9.3–10.6 mm) ( NCHU- ZOOL 15673 ), Baoli R. estuary, coll. P.-Y. Hsu and J.-W. Hsu, 11 July 2017 ; 1 ♂ (12.1 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15716), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. P.-Y. Hsu et al., 18 Mar. 2018 ; 1 ♂ (7.2 mm), 1 ♀ (9.3 mm), 1 ovig. ♀ (12.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15679), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 18 July 2018 ; 3 ♀♀ (10.2–14.6 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15674), 1 ♀ (14.2 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15677), 1 ♀ (15.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15680), Baoli R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. P.-Y. Hsu et al., 6 Nov. 2018 ; 1 ♂ (12.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15720), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-H. Lee, 21 June 2009 ; 1 ♀ (17.8 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15730), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-H. Lee, 21 Nov. 2009 ; 1 ♂ (12.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15670), 2 ♂♂ (9.6–9.7 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15684), 4 ♀♀ (13.1–17.2 mm), 3 ovig. ♀♀ (12.0– 13.9 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15701), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-H. Lee and W.-C. Wang, 30 Mar. 2010 ; 1 ♀ (10.9 mm) ( NMMBCD 4042 ), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 30 July 2013 ; 1 ♂ (12.4 mm), 1 ♀ (15.7 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15686), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 5 June 2015 ; 1 ♀ (13.1 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15683), 2 ♀♀ (10.6–14.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15685), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 24 May 2016 ; 2 ♂♂ (13.2–13.4 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15687), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 5 July 2016 ; 1 ♂ (11.7 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15676), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. P.-Y. Hsu & C.-Y. Chi, 4 Dec. 2016 ; 2 ♂♂ (12.8–13.9 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15690), 1 ♀ (9.7 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15692), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, 11 July 2017 ; 3 ♂♂ (9.0– 11.7 mm), 1 ovig. ♀ (13.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15672), 2 ♀♀ (14.4–16.8 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15717), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, 19 Mar. 2018 ; 4 ♂♂ (8.5–10.8 mm), 5 ♀♀ (12.1–15.6 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15695), 4 ♂♂ (10.1–14.3 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15671), 10 ♀♀ (9.8–16.0 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15675), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. P.-Y. Hsu & J.-W. Hsu, 7 Nov. 2018 .
Diagnosis. Carapace quadrate, slightly broader than long, 1.23 times as broad as long (n = 64); surface convex, weakly punctate, granulate, with distinct groove between epigastric regions. Frontal margin slightly concave. Anterolateral margin with 3 teeth including orbital tooth; last tooth weak, indistinct. Infraorbital ridge in male heteromorphic, proximal part with 4–8 rounded tubercles, followed by elongated, laterally Y-shaped crest, distal part with rounded tubercle; female with 14–21 sparse isomorphically interspaced, rounded tubercles. Cheliped palm stout, surface finely punctate; usually unequal in male, distinct patch of setae at base of fingers, mostly expanding onto fixed finger; chelipeds in female usually equal, inconspicuous patch of setae at base of fingers or glabrous. Ambulatory legs broad, anterior margins of merus, carpus, propodus covered with short setae. G1 slender, tapering, slightly curved towards distal end; vulvae sunken in lateral part, with elongated semicircular operculum.
Ecological notes. The habitat is muddy substrate, with or without vegetation in southern Taiwan, at a distance of 600–800 m from a river mouth ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A–C). This species is sympatric with Par. pilimana , Par. pilosa and Pse. subquadrata in southern Taiwan, with burrow depths of ca. 50 cm or less.
Distribution. From Japan (southern Ryukyus), Taiwan (Yilan and Pingtung) (new record), to Indonesia (Papua).
Remarks. Although we did not examine specimens of Par. daviei from its type locality (Irian Jaya, Papua, Indonesia) or the adjacent area, the Taiwanese specimens agree well with the original description ( Sakai et al. 2006), including carapace ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ; Sakai et al. 2006: figs. 77, 78), male chelae ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ; Sakai et al. 2006: fig. 77), male infraorbital ridges ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ; Sakai et al. 2006: fig. 66), and G1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E–H; Sakai et al. 2006: fig. 68).
While males of Par. daviei , Par. pilimana and Par. pilosa can be separated by the distinct characters of infraorbital ridges and chelae, the morphologies of females are similar and can only be distinguished by minor differences ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ).
Morphologically, the shapes of the chelipeds and vulvae of females of Par. daviei and Par. pilimana are very similar, but they can be distinguished by the infraorbital ridge and the setae on the outer surface of the palms. Based on the female specimens examined, the rounded tubercles of the infraorbital ridge are sparser in female Par. daviei ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ) (vs. more concentrated in female Par. pilimana , Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ), and the outer surface of the palm in female Par. daviei is relatively less setose ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ) and sometimes glabrous ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ; probably due to abrasion) (vs. with a distinct patch of setae in female Par. pilimana , Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ).
In life, Par. daviei has distinct orange chelipeds and a brown carapace in both adult sexes ( Fig. 1A, D, G, H View FIGURE 1 ). According to this feature, one of the figures of “ Pse. subquadrata ” in Li & Chiu (2013: upper right image on p. 61) should be Par. daviei instead (the chelipeds of Pse. subquadrata are gray).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Parahelice daviei ( Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006 )
Shih, Hsi-Te, Hsu, Jhih-Wei, Li, Jheng-Jhang, Ng, Ngan Kee & Lee, Jung-Hsiang 2020 |
Parahelice pilimana —
Nishigaki, K. & Saeki, T. & Naruse, T. 2011: 88 |
Parahelice daviei —
Nishigaki, K. & Saeki, T. & Naruse, T. 2011: 86 |
Ng, P. K. L. & Guinot, D. & Davie, P. J. F. 2008: 227 |
Pseudohelice (Parahelice) daviei Sakai, Türkay & Yang, 2006: 48
Sakai, K. & Turkay, M. & Yang, S. - L. 2006: 48 |