Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838

Gustafsson, Daniel R., Tian, Chunpo, Ren, Mengjiao, Li, Zhu, Sun, Xiuling & Zou, Fasheng, 2024, Separation of Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838, and Dictyocotes Kéler, 1940 (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with descriptions of four new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 968, pp. 1-36 : 5-10

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2024.968.2703

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9864A04F-83FA-49EA-8DA3-D0BEA38160E4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14511311

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD2071-A85D-6867-FDCF-F533FE56F982

treatment provided by

Plazi (2024-10-29 17:18:51, last updated 2024-12-18 02:55:12)

scientific name

Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838
status

 

Genus Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838 View in CoL

Ricinus De Geer, 1778: 69 View in CoL [in partim].

Goniodes Nitzsch, 1818: 293 View in CoL [in partim].

Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838: 431 View in CoL .

Type species

Ricinus gallinae De Geer, 1778: 79 , by subsequent designation ( Johnston & Harrison 1911: 326).

Diagnosis

Goniocotes is morphologically variable (see below), but all species here retained in Goniocotes can be separated from the species of Dictyocotes by the following combination of morphological characters: 1) male genitalia without mesosome in Goniocotes (e.g., Fig. 4 View Figs 3–5 ), but with mesosome in Dictyocotes ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18–20 ); 2) female vulval margin gently rounded in Goniocotes (e.g., Fig. 5 View Figs 3–5 ; expect Goniocotes chapini Clay, 1936 ), but margin notched or concave medianly in Dictyocotes ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ; except in D. rolandi Gustafsson et al., 2021 ); 3) male parameres continuous with lateral margins of basal apodeme in Goniocotes (e.g., Fig. 4 View Figs 3–5 ), but with parameres separated from, and possibly articulating with, basal apodeme in Dictyocotes ( Fig. 19 View Figs 18–20 ).

Many additional characters are variable within Goniocotes as circumscribed here, which may indicate that this genus is paraphyletic or consisting of several monophyletic groups that may deserve recognition as subgenera or genera in a future revision. The following characters can separate the type species of Goniocotes and many morphologically similar species from Dictyocotes : male tergopleurites II–V with 1–2 tergocentral setae (ss + tps) on each side in Goniocotes s. str. (e.g., Fig. 1 View Fig ), but at least some of these segments (typically at least II–III) with>5 tergocentral setae on each side in males of Dictyocotes ( Fig. 16 View Fig ); apart from abdominal segment VI, each abdominal segment has a single sts on each side in Goniocotes s. str. (e.g., Fig. 1 View Fig ), but at least some segments (typically III–V) have 2–4 sts on each side in Dictyocotes ( Fig. 16 View Fig ); male lateral tergopleurite IX+X slender and small in Goniocotes s. str. (e.g., Fig. 1 View Fig ), but larger, triangular or irregular in shape in Dictyocotes ( Fig. 16 View Fig ). In almost all Goniocotes there are a maximum of 15 short, slender vms on each side of the female vulval margin (e.g., Fig. 5 View Figs 3–5 ), whereas in Dictyocotes there are always>20 on each side ( Fig. 20 View Figs 18–20 ); however, Goniocotes cacumentalis sp. nov. has>20 vms on each side ( Fig. 10 View Figs 8–10 ) but is otherwise morphologically similar to Goniocotes s. lat. and is here included in that genus.

Description

Very small lice of the body louse ecomorph (sensu Johnson et al. 2012). Head shape variable among species: preantennal head gently rounded to somewhat flattened at frons, temples may be parallel or slightly divergent posteriorly, typically rounded at site of mts1, and with a more or less pronounced posterior occipital bulge at site of mts5. Marginal and ventral carinae uninterrupted; marginal carina may be very narrow or very broad, with clear attendant canals connecting to apertures of many setae (e.g., dsms, as1–3, avs1). Dorsal preantennal suture absent, but inner dorsal curved line may be present, delimiting a less densely sclerotized central part dorsal to the mandibles and ventral carina; typically, this line becomes obscure posteriorly and does not completely surround the less sclerotized area. Preantennal nodi variable, may be roughly square-shaped, elongated, or rather small. Antennae sexually monomorphic. Eyes often proportionately large. Marginal temporal carina typically broad, with undulating median margin and a distinct occipital nodus originating marginally median to mts5 on each side. Head chaetotaxy: all usual head setae present; as1–3 and avs1 marginal or submarginal, vsms1–2 much separated; pns micro- to mesoseta, s1–6 typically all present as sensilla, but may be difficult to see or absent (particularly s5), and additional sensilla may be present ( Fig. 3 View Figs 3–5 ); pts typically mesoseta; os may be macroseta in male, but always microseta in female (except in G. cacumentalis sp. nov.); pos positioned far posterior to eye; mts1 and mts3 macrosetae, mts5 may be thorn-like, mts2 and mts4 microsetae.

Prothorax wider than long, with ppss macroseta on postero-lateral corner. Pterothorax variable, but typically pentagonal, with 2 lpts macrosetae on postero-lateral corners, separated by clear gap from 2 ipts macrosetae; single smns micro- or mesoseta present submarginally, but may be difficult to see if small, or alternatively may be absent; mpts absent. Proepimera extensive, may be fused medianly. Meso- and metasterna absent, but mss and mets present. Legs short and stout, most notably with three stout ventral setae on tibiae II–III (likely tbII-v3–5 and tbIII-v3–5, but homology uncertain). Other leg chaetotaxy variable, and many setae very short. In G. gallinae and similar species: tbI-a1–2, fI-v2, cII-a1, tbII-a1–2, tbII-p1–2, tbIII-p4–5, tbII-dm3, cIII-a1, tbIII-a1–2, tbIII-p1–2, tbIII-4–5, tbIII-dm3 all very short microsetae or absent; fII-p1, fII-dm4, fIII–p1, fIII-dm4 absent.

Abdomen broadly rounded, more elongated in female. Tergopleurites II–IX+X divided medianly, typically with posterior tergopleurites more reduced compared to anterior tergopleurites (especially in male). Male abdominal segment IX+X with lateral sclerite on each side and central sclerite anterior to dorsal ano-genital opening. Female tergopleurites IX+X fused medianly. Paratergal plates may be indistinct, absent, or clearly visible and broad. Sternal plates generally absent, but reticulated, lightly sclerotized areas may be visible on ventral side of female abdominal segments II–VI ( Fig. 12 View Fig ), or on segments II–VI in both sexes (not shown). Male subgenital plate variable, may be divided medianly; female subgenital plate absent. Subvulval plates may be present, but indistinct in many species. Abdominal chaetotaxy variable among species; anterior seta of tergopleurite II present. In G. gallinae and similar species, chaetotaxy is much reduced: ss present on tergopleurites II–VII (male; typically mesosetae in anterior segments and microsetae in posterior segments) or II–VIII (female; typically of uniform length); tps absent (female and males of some species) or present only on tergopleurites II, II–III, or II–IV (males of some species); psps typically present on tergopleurites II–VII (male) or V–VII (female; but sensilla may be visible on II–IV), but variable and may be absent more anteriorly in males, or be associated with a single shorter more median seta (tps?) in some segments. In other groups the dorsal abdominal chaetotaxy is much more extensive. Ventral side with 1 sts on each side of segments II–V, and 2 sts on each side on segments VI. Macrosetae present on ventral side of abdominal segments VII–VIII in both sexes.

Male genitalia solenoid, consisting of slender, elongated (anterior end may reach abdominal segment II) basal apodeme fused distally with simple parameres. Distal to male genitalia are often diaphanous, irregular structures of uncertain homologies, which in rare cases may have visible sensilla. In some species, parameral sensilla are visible, but these are easily overlooked if the male genitalia are pale or the specimen is poorly clearer; often, the sites of these sensilla are visible only because the parameres are swollen. Distal margin of basal apodeme may be indistinct median to parameres, or may be clearly delimited. In a few species, a vague, slightly reticulated structure which may be a genital sac is visible. Female vulval margin typically gently rounded to somewhat flattened medianly, with a small number (<15) vms microsetae and 2–4 (in most species 3) vss thornlike setae on each side; vos microsetae variable in number and location, and may form distally convergent rows, but rarely numerous.

Host and geographical distribution

Goniocotes is only known from hosts in the order Galliformes Temminck, 1820 , but distribution is somewhat scattered. Species of Goniocotes are known from at least some of the hosts in each of the three divisions of Phasianidae Horsfield, 1821 by Kimball et al. (2021), as well as on Numididae de Sélys Longchamps, 1842 and Megapodiidae Lesson, 1831 . However, the genus is largely absent on more boreal hosts, almost all New World hosts (except Meleagris gallopavo Linnaeus, 1758 , which has acquired G. gallinae probably as stragglers in domestic settings), and many alpine hosts ( Price et al. 2003). The presence of this genus on megapodiid hosts also appears to be limited ( Mey 1997), and the Goniocotes species from numidid hosts, as well as many other species, are morphologically aberrant and may warrant separation into different genus. No species are known from cracid or odontophorid hosts.

Included species

In anticipation of a broader revision of the genus, all species placed in Goniocotes by Price et al. (2003: 181–182) are here retained in this genus, with the exception of the species listed under Dictyocotes below and those separated into the genus Pavoniocotes by Gustafsson et al. (2023).

Goniocotes afer Tendeiro, 1989: 70 View in CoL .

Goniocotes afropavo ( Clay, 1938: 9) View in CoL [in Goniodes View in CoL ]

Goniocotes albidus Giebel, 1874: 189 View in CoL .

Goniocotes homocerus Kéler, 1940: 151 View in CoL .

Goniocotes phasiani Kéler, 1940: 151 View in CoL .

Goniocotes cacumentalis sp. nov.

Goniocotes caoi sp. nov.

Goniocotes castaneicollis Tendeiro, 1965: 79 View in CoL .

Goniocotes chapini ( Clay, 1938: 7) View in CoL [in Goniodes View in CoL ].

Goniocotes chrysocephalus Giebel, 1874: 189 View in CoL .

Goniocotes clayae Tendeiro, 1954a: 316 View in CoL .

Goniocotes congolensis Tendeiro, 1989: 82 View in CoL .

Goniocotes coxatus Piaget, 1885: 43 View in CoL .

Goniocotes crassicauda Tendeiro, 1989: 82 View in CoL .

Goniocotes creber Kellogg, 1896b: 519 View in CoL .

Goniocotes diasi Tendeiro, 1954b:81 View in CoL .

Goniocotes diplogonus Nitzsch View in CoL in Giebel, 1866: 389.

Goniocotes eurygaster Piaget, 1885: 43 View in CoL .

Goniocotes gallinae ( De Geer, 1778: 79) View in CoL [in Ricinus View in CoL ].

Goniocotes hologaster ( Nitzsch, 1818: 294) View in CoL .

Goniocotes gregarius View in CoL (Nitzsch in Giebel, 1866: 388) [in Goniodes View in CoL ].

Goniocotes ictiorhynchi Tendeiro, 1989: 76 View in CoL .

Goniocotes ignitus Eichler, 1947: 12 View in CoL .

Goniocotes ignitus rufus Eichler, 1947: 13 View in CoL .

Goniocotes irregularis Rudow, 1869: 23 [unidentifiable].

Goniocotes jifrufti Ansari, 1947: 298 .

Goniocotes keleri Tendeiro, 1989: 73 View in CoL .

Goniocotes keniensis Tendeiro, 1989: 75 View in CoL .

Goniocotes kivuensis Tendeiro, 1960: 119 View in CoL .

Goniocotes kristinae Gustafsson, Tian & Zou, 2021: 301 View in CoL View Cited Treatment .

Goniocotes laticeps Piaget, 1885: 41 [unidentifiable].

Goniocotes maculatus Taschenberg, 1882: 76 View in CoL .

Goniocotes nigromaculatus Mjöberg, 1910: 106 View in CoL .

Goniocotes numidae Kéler, 1940: 147 View in CoL .

Goniocotes valdezi Tendeiro, 1954a: 327 View in CoL .

Goniocotes megalocephalus Uchida, 1916: 86 View in CoL .

Goniocotes macrocephalus Uchida, 1916: 86 View in CoL .

Goniocotes microcephalus Uchida, 1917: 177 View in CoL .

Goniocotes microthorax ( Stephens, 1829: 333) View in CoL [in Goniodes View in CoL ].

Goniocotes alatus Piaget, 1885: 45 View in CoL .

Goniocotes simillimus Kéler, 1937: 128 View in CoL .

Goniocotes nahanii Tendeiro, 1989: 67 View in CoL .

Goniocotes obscurus Giebel, 1874: 188 View in CoL .

Goniocotes pallidiflavus Piaget, 1890: 235 View in CoL .

Goniocotes pallidomaculatus Piaget, 1880: 227 View in CoL .

Goniocotes plumiferae Tendeiro, 1989: 81 View in CoL .

Goniocotes pternistis Tendeiro, 1965: 74 View in CoL .

Goniocotes pucherani Tendeiro, 1989: 79 View in CoL .

Goniocotes punctatus Neumann, 1891: 91 View in CoL .

Goniocotes pusillus View in CoL (Nitzsch in Giebel, 1866: 387) [in Goniodes View in CoL ].

Goniocotes rectangulatus Nitzsch View in CoL in Giebel, 1866: 389.

Goniocotes rectangulus Giebel, 1874: 185 View in CoL .

Goniocotes reticulatus Kéler, 1940: 142 View in CoL .

Goniocotes rotundiceps Piaget, 1880: 223 View in CoL .

Goniocotes sarissa sp. nov.

Goniocotes schraderi Tendeiro, 1989: 74 View in CoL .

Goniocotes shelleyii Tendeiro, 1989: 66 View in CoL .

Goniocotes vulturini Tendeiro, 1989: 78 View in CoL .

Remarks

Goniocotes as circumscribed here is undoubtedly morphologically variable, and several groups may deserve recognition as at least subgenera. However, adequate illustrations and descriptions of most species in the genus have never been published, and a general revision is sorely needed. From published descriptions and the specimens we have examined from various East Asian hosts, it is clear that the following character sets may be especially useful for separating species groups or future genera in the Goniocotes -group:

Ocular seta – in G. gallinae and many other species this seta is sexually monomorphic, but the os are macrosetae in males of, e.g., G. albidus , G. pusillus , and G. cacumentalis sp. nov. ( Fig. 6 View Fig ).

Pterothoracic setae – in almost all species, there is only a single smns on each side submedianly (e.g., Fig. 6 View Fig ), but in G. kristinae and G. sarissa sp. nov. there is a patch of several setae in this area ( Fig. 11 View Fig ). In some other species the smns may be absent, but as these setae may be sensillous they may have been overlooked in the specimens we have examined.

Male abdominal chaetotaxy – in G. gallinae and many other species this is reduced, with at most 1 tps on each side on some or all of tergopleurites II–IV. However, in many other species the number of tps is substantially higher (e.g., Fig. 11 View Fig ), with setal rows that may reach psps in species like G. albidus and G. pusillus . Moreover, the distribution of psps on male tergopleurites varies among species, and these setae may be absent in more anterior segments (e.g., in G. pusillus ). In G. maculatus , there are single tps macrosetae roughly equidistant between the psps and ss.

Abdominal plates – sternal plates are absent in almost all species of Goniocotes , but present in the form of reticulated but poorly sclerotized plates in females of G. kristinae and G. sarissa sp. nov. ( Fig. 12 View Fig ), and as small reticulated plates in G. albidus . In G. maculatus , there are small nodi lateral to spiracle openings on abdominal segments II–V. Moreover, whereas reticulation patterns are indistinct or absent in most Goniocotes , they are clear and extensive in G. kristinae , G. sarissa ( Figs 11–12 View Fig View Fig ), G. albidus , and some other species.

Some of the morphological variation within Goniocotes , and the corresponding characters in Dictyocotes , are summarized in Table 2 View Table 2 .

Ansari M. A. R. 1947. Mallophaga (Ischnocera) infesting birds in the Punjab (India). Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 13: 253 - 303.

Burmeister K. H. K. 1838. Mallophaga Nitzsch. In: Handbuch der Entomologie. Zweiter Band. Besondere Entomologie. Zweite Abtheilung. Lauskerfe. Gymnognatha. (Zweite Halfte; vulgo Neuroptera). Theod. Chr. Fried. Enslin, Berlin. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8135

Clay T. 1938. New species of Mallophaga from Afropavo congensis Chapin. American Museum Novitates 1008: 1 - 11. Available from http: // hdl. handle. net / 2246 / 3800 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

De Geer C. 1778. Memoires pour servir a l'Histoire des Insectes. Tome 7. Pierre Hesselberg, Stockholm. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 14802

Eichler W. 1947. Dr. E. Mjoberg's zoological collections from Sumatra. 15. Mallophaga. Arkiv for Zoologi 39: 1 - 21.

Giebel C. G. 1866. Die im zoologischen Museum der Universitat Halle aufgestellten Epizoen nebst Beobachtungen uber dieselben. Zeitschrift fur die gesammten Naturwissenschaften 28: 353 - 397. Available from https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 31194162 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

Giebel C. G. 1874. Insecta epizoa. Otto Wigand, Leipzig. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 66072

Gustafsson D. R., Tian C. & Zou F. 2021. New species of ischnoceran chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Chinese birds. Zootaxa 4990: 305 - 328. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4990.2.6

Gustafsson D. R., Grossi A. A., Ren M. & Zou F. 2023. The Goniodidae (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) of peafowl (Aves: Galliformes: Pavo), with description of a new genus. Journal of Natural History 57: 996 - 1048. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222933.2023.2226375

Johnson K. P., Shreve S. M. & Smith V. S. 2012. Repeated adaptive divergence of microhabitat specialization in avian feather lice. BMC Biology 10: 52. https: // doi. org / 10.1186 / 1741 - 7007 - 10 - 52

Johnston T. H. & Harrison L. 1911. Notes on some mallophagan generic names. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 41: 321 - 328. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 21901

Keler S. von 1937. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Mallophagen des Rebhuhnes (Perdix perdix Linn.). Arbeiten uber Morphologische und Taxonomische Entomologie aus Berlin-Dahlem 4: 126 - 135.

Keler S. von 1940. [1939] Baustoff zu einer Monographie der Mallophagen. II. Teil: Uberfamilie der Nirmoidea (1) Die Familien Trichophilopteridae, Goniodidae, Heptapsogastridae. Nova Acta Leopoldiana (N. F.) 8: 1 - 254.

Kellogg V. L. 1896 b. New Mallophaga II, from land birds, together with an account of the mallophagous mouth-parts. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 2 6: 431 - 548.

Kimball R. T., Hosner P. A. & Braun E. J. 2021. A phylogenomic supermatrix of Galliformes (Landfowl) reveals biased branch lengths. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 158: 107091. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2021.107091

Linnaeus C. von 1758. Systema naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. 10 th Edition. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm [Holmiae]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 542

Mey E. 1997. Die Goniodiden (Insecta, Phthiraptera, Ischnocera) der Grossfusshuhner (Megapodiidae). Rudolstadter Naturhistorische Schriften 8: 19 - 44.

Mjoberg E. 1910. Studien uber Mallophagen und Anopluren. Arkiv for Zoologi 6: 1 - 296. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 26907

Neumann L. G. 1891. Notes sur quelques Ricinidae d'origin exotique. Bulletin de la Societe d'Histoire naturelle de Toulouse 25: 83 - 93. Available from https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 40573747 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

Nitzsch C. L. 1818. Die Familien und Gattungen der Thierinsekten (insecta epizoica); als Prodromus einer Naturgeschichte derselben. Magazin der Entomologie 3: 261 - 316. Available from https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 25414361 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

Piaget E. 1880. Les Pediculines. Essai monographique. E. J. Brill, Leiden. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 9789004588097

Piaget E. 1885. Les Pediculines. Essai Monographique. Supplement. E. J. Brill, Leiden. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 9789004584426

Piaget E. 1890. Quelques pediculines nouvelles. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 33: 223 - 259. Available from https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 27955971 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

Price R. D., Hellenthal R. A., Palma R. L., Johnson K. P. & Clayton D. H. 2003. The Chewing Lice: World Checklist and Biological Overview. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 24.

Rudow F. 1869. Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Mallophagen oder Pelzfresser. Neue exotische Arten der Familie Philopterus. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangen der Doctorwurde bei der philosophischen Facultat der Universitat zur Leipzig. Wilhelm Plotz, Halle.

Stephens J. F. 1829. A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects: Being an Attempt to Arrange all the Hitherto Discovered Indigenous Insects in Accordance with their Natural Affinities. Baldwin & Cradock, London. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8987

Taschenberg O. 1882. Die Mallophagen mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der von Dr. Meyer gesammelten Arten. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Cursorium 64: 1 - 231. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 82513

Tendeiro J. 1954 a. Malofagos de Guine Portuguesa. Novos estudos sobre malofagos dos galiformes. Boletim Cultural da Guine Portuguesa 34: 283 - 362.

Tendeiro J. 1954 b. Malofagos de Guine Portuguesa. Estudios sobre diversos malofagos dos galiformes guineenses. Boletim Cultural da Guine Portuguesa 33: 1 - 162.

Tendeiro J. 1960. Etudes sur les Mallophages africains. Junta de Investigacoes Cientificas do Ultramar. Estudoes, Ensaios e Documentos 65: 1 - 234.

Tendeiro J. 1965. Nouvelles etudes sur les Mallophages africains. Revista dos Estudos Gerais Universitarios de Moccambique 2: 9 - 155.

Tendeiro J. 1989. Etudes sur les Mallophages (Insecta, Mallophaga) des galliformes de l'Afrique centrale II - Genre Goniocotes Burmeister, 1838. Garcia de Orta, Serie de Zoologia 15: 63 - 97.

Uchida S. 1916. Bird-infesting Mallophaga from Japan (II). (Genera Goniodes and Goniocotes). Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 9: 81 - 88. Available from https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 44265263 [accessed 22 Jan. 2024].

Uchida S. 1917. Mallophaga from birds of Formosa. Journal of the College of Agriculture, Tokyo 3: 171 - 188.

Gallery Image

Figs 3–5. Goniocotes caoi sp. nov. 3–4. Holotype, ♂ (BMNH, slide 57, box E0026203). 3. Head, dorsal and ventral views. 4. Genitalia, dorsal view. 5. Female genitalia, ventral view. Abbreviations: as1–3 = anterior setae 1–3; avs1 = anterior ventral seta 1; dsms = dorsal submarginal seta; mts1–5 = marginal temporal setae 1–5; os = ocular seta; pns = postnodal seta; pos = preocular seta; pst = parameral seta; s1–6 = sensilla of dorsal head 1–6; vms = vulval marginal seta; vos = vulval oblique seta; vsms 1–2 = ventral submarginal setae 1–2; vss = vulval submarginal seta.

Gallery Image

Figs 18–20. Dictyocotes furcatus sp. nov. 18–19. Holotype, ♂ (BMNH, slide 29, box E0026136). 18. Head, dorsal and ventral views. 19. Genitalia, dorsal view. 20. Female genitalia, ventral view.

Gallery Image

Fig. 1. Goniocotes caoi sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (BMNH, slide 57, box E0026203). Habitus, dorsal and ventral views. Abbreviations: ipts = intermediate pteronotal seta; lpts = lateral pteronotal seta; mets = metathoracic seta; mss = mesothoracic seta; ppss = pronotal post-spiracular seta; ps = paratergal seta; psps = principal post-spiracular seta; ss = sutural seta; sts = sternal seta.

Gallery Image

Fig. 16. Dictyocotes furcatus sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (BMNH, slide 29, box E0026136). Habitus, dorsal and ventral views.

Gallery Image

Figs 8–10. Goniocotes cacumentalis sp. nov. 8–9. Holotype, ♂ (NHML, slide NHMUK010676049). 8. Head, dorsal and ventral views. 9. Genitalia, dorsal view. 10. Paratype, ♂ (NHML, slide NHMUK010676049). Genitalia, ventral view.

Gallery Image

Fig. 12. Goniocotes sarissa sp. nov. Female habitus, dorsal and ventral views.

Gallery Image

Fig. 6. Goniocotes cacumentalis sp. nov. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. Abbreviations: smns = submarginal mesometanotal seta; tps = tergal posterior seta.

Gallery Image

Fig. 11. Goniocotes sarissa sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (BMNH, slide 95, box E0026011). Habitus, dorsal and ventral views.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Psocodea

SuperFamily

Ischnocera

Family

Philopteridae