Echinodermata Klein, 1734
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13741171 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD87E1-0668-FFDE-FCAB-4DBDFDF273A0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Echinodermata Klein, 1734 |
status |
|
Phylum Echinodermata Klein, 1734 View in CoL View at ENA
Discussion.—Echinoderm ossicles of varying morphology are present in all samples. The echinoderm affinity of these fossils is demonstrated by the preserved stereome ultrastructure. The composite construction of echinoderm skeletons usually precludes identification of individual taxa based only on disarticulated material but two ossicle types among the forms present in Newfoundland are sufficiently distinct to warrant individual description. Less distinct, circular, oval or irregular ossicles also occur together with the two types described below.
Morphotype 1: This type of sclerite is represented by triangular to sub−circular concavo−convex ossicles with variously indented margins ( Fig. 3E–G View Fig ). These sclerites are reminiscent of star−shaped sclerites of eocrinoids (compare Fig. 3E–F View Fig to pl. 1 of Ubaghs and Vizcaïno 1990).
Morphotype 2: The second type of sclerite is represented by circular to oval, pyramidal ossicles with the upper (convex) surface ornamented by small depressions or undulating ridges and the lower (variously concave, convex or flat) surface with larger, irregular depressions divided by narrow ridges ( Fig. 3H–J View Fig ). Morphologically identical ossicles were recently described from the Bastion and Ella Island Formation of North−East Greenland ( Skovsted 2006a: fig. 7.14–15) and may have potential for regional correlation .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.