Pentaceraster sibogae Döderlein 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5526.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:987FAD00-32A7-4E38-AFAD-6EAC8D808FB2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14045880 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BF87BF-2635-5D7F-61C4-BB1EFCE54176 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pentaceraster sibogae Döderlein 1916 |
status |
|
Pentaceraster sibogae Döderlein 1916 View in CoL
FIGURE 42C–D View FIGURE 42 , 43A–F View FIGURE 43
Comments
This species was identified based on descriptions summarized by Liao & Clark (1995) and Döderlein (1936). Diagnostic characters used include the presence of large carinal spines and abactinal-lateral spines on both the disk and arm, as well as spines present on all of the superomarginal spines. This species varies widely however, demonstrating a broad range of body shape with highly variable R/r ratios demonstrating more elongate versus more triangular arms in some individuals as well as a variably thick to arched disk as well as a large number of color patterns ranging from disk and arms with light blue to red to spines with dark red to yellow or white respectively. The interradial arcs in some individuals ranged from weakly curved to straight to more acute. No oral side characters, such as furrow spines or subambulacrals, were observed. The high degree of variation suggests further work into the possibility of cryptic taxa across this widely occurring species. Figures 43C and 43D View FIGURE 43 show Hong Kong specimens with variable arm number, six and four respectively.
This represents the first occurrence of this species in Hong Kong.
Occurrence/Distribution
Hong Kong, 10– 20 m.
Outside Hong Kong. Southern China, Hainan Island , Borneo Bank and Indonesia. 10 m.
DISCUSSION
General Comments
Our work presents multiple new observations of echinoderms in Hong Kong, including five new occurrences for Asteroidea and eleven new occurrences for Echinoidea ( Tables 1 View TABLE 1 and 2 View TABLE 2 ). The species outlined herein have been previously recorded from the South China Sea, but not specifically from Hong Kong. Liao & Clark (1995) summarized multiple species from southern China but which were notably absent from Hong Kong. This includes larger, very prominent urchin species such as Prionocidaris baculosa and Coelopleurus maculatus .
Liao & Clark (1995) described the occurrence of Linckia laevigata , Echinaster luzonicus , Diadema savigny i and Tripneustes gratilla as uncommon, with individual species showing uneven distribution patterns. For example, Echinaster luzonicus and Tripneustes gratilla are regularly spotted at specific sites such as the Ninepin Islands. In other instances, some species are not seen frequently. For example, since 2014, only one sighting of Linckia laevigata and four of Diadema savignyi , respectively, have been made. Although commonly encountered elsewhere, these species are not frequently observed in the waters of Hong Kong.
The further discoveries of new occurrence in Hong Kong are attributed largely to improved reporting and surveys of deeper and more remote areas than have previously been accessible without SCUBA. Social media platforms, such as Facebook, have facilitated sharing of images and permitted contact between photographers and professional taxonomists. Citizen scientist platforms, such as iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/home) have archived records of taxon imagery for specific areas, as shared by regional photographers. This publication would not have taken place without shared images via social media.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |