Scopocirinae
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4040.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:392A2F34-0B0C-4298-BBF5-76A82CED0C59 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6121700 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C087CB-FF93-5452-FF05-F954FD4DFE89 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scopocirinae |
status |
|
Subfamily Scopocirinae Simon, 1901
Scopocireae Simon, 1901: 442, 1048 (Type genus: Scopocira Simon, 1900 ).
Monophyly: The two genera included here are only tentatively associated, as the DNA data for Gypogyna are weak, as are the morphological synapomorphies linking it with Scopocira . Males of both Scopocira and Gypogyna have apophyses on the distal prolateral portion of the chelicerae, but these are closer to the promarginal teeth, rather than on a more dorsal (external) position on the chelicerae. It is not clear whether these structures could be homologous to the amycine (plesiomorphic) mastidia or independently evolved projections. There is a dorsally placed RTA that appears to engage against a lobe of the cymbium, possibly to serve as a lock during copulation (see Costa & Ruiz 2014: figs 80–107). Both genera also share a feature unusual among spiders: males are typically larger than females. However, this is also seen, for example, in some gophoines.
Although Gypogyna is only tentatively placed with Scopocira , it can be placed with more confidence in the larger clade of node 2 ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37 – 38 ) by molecular data, as well as by the form of the spermathecae and copulatory ducts, and the terminal embolus loop over the cymbium.
DNA |
Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.