Haemogamasus horridus Michael, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4273.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FED562EC-7139-485D-BB6F-6D18769F47C3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6023626 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C31742-FFB5-4239-FF40-F9D8FDD3FDB4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haemogamasus horridus Michael, 1892 |
status |
|
Haemogamasus horridus Michael, 1892
Haemogamasus horridus Michael 1892: 312 , pl. XXXII, figs 1–5.
Euhaemogamasus horridus .— Bregetova, 1949: 164, figs 1–3; Keegan, 1951: 235, fig. 47.
Haemogamasus antonii Bregetova, 1949: 167 (nom. nov. pro Haemogamasus horridus sensu Oudemans, 1913 ).
Haemogamasus horridus .— Oudemans 1903: 89; Oudemans, 1913: 146, textfigs 98–107, pl. II, figs 11–15; Vitzthum, 1930: 403; Willmann, 1952: 402; Bregetova, 1955: 261, 276, fig. 483–485, 533, 534; Bregetova, 1956a: 131, 148, figs 261–263, 318–319; Lange, 1958: 210, fig. 52, V; Mrciak, 1958: 71; Strandtmann & Wharton, 1958: 132; Kozlowski, 1960: 413, fig. 4; Costa, 1961: 49, figs 82, 83; Evans & Till, 1966: 252, fig. 57, A, B, 58; Allred, 1969: 109; Karg 1971: 189, fig. 204 a, c; Zemskaya, 1973: 118; Haitlinger, 1988: 637, figs 1, 2; Lundquist, 1990: 332, figs 2, D, 3, D; Karg, 1993: 166; Casanueva et al., 1994: 63, figs 5–8; Mašán & Fend’a, 2010: 87, figs 60, 68, 76, 90–92; Fyodorova & Kharadov, 2012: 275, 277.
Type locality. England (without exact locality).
Type specimens. Types of the species described by Michael (1892) are in the Natural History Museum, London (fide Lundquist & Edler, 1979).
Type host. The common mole, Talpa europaea (L., 1758), in its nests.
Host range. Haemogamasus horridus is able to parasitise a wide range of rodents and insectivores ( Zemskaya, 1973; Haitlinger, 1988), and no particular species of mammals can be regarded as its principal host.
Distribution. This species has been collected from Europe, the Near East, Kyrgyzstan, and South America ( Evans & Till, 1966; Zemskaya, 1973; Casanueva et al., 1994; Cicek et al., 2008), though it is apparently absent in North America ( Williams et al., 1978; Whitaker et al., 2007). The data on its presence in Asiatic Russia are very scant. Zemskaya (1973) mentioned it from Tomsk Region (Western Siberia), and this remains the only published record of Hg. horridus from Asiatic Russia. Also, this species is mentioned in the electronic catalogue of the collection of the Siberian Zoological Museum (Novosibirsk, Russia) as living in Western Siberia (http:// szmn.sbras.ru/Inverteb/ Gamasina .htm). Unfortunately, both sources quoted above contain no data about exact localities of this species in Siberia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Gamasina |
Family |
|
Genus |
Haemogamasus horridus Michael, 1892
Vinarski, Maxim V. & Korallo-Vinarskaya, Natalia P. 2017 |
Euhaemogamasus horridus
Keegan 1951: 235 |
Bregetova 1949: 164 |
Haemogamasus antonii
Bregetova 1949: 167 |
Haemogamasus horridus
Fyodorova 2012: 275 |
Casanueva 1994: 63 |
Karg 1993: 166 |
Lundquist 1990: 332 |
Haitlinger 1988: 637 |
Zemskaya 1973: 118 |
Karg 1971: 189 |
Allred 1969: 109 |
Evans 1966: 252 |
Costa 1961: 49 |
Kozlowski 1960: 413 |
Lange 1958: 210 |
Mrciak 1958: 71 |
Strandtmann 1958: 132 |
Bregetova 1956: 131 |
Bregetova 1955: 261 |
Willmann 1952: 402 |
Vitzthum 1930: 403 |
Oudemans 1913: 146 |
Oudemans 1903: 89 |
Haemogamasus horridus
Michael 1892: 312 |