Scotinoecus fasciatus Tullgren, 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281994 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6170351 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C43846-FFCC-2272-6AC2-FFDA7BA6F882 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scotinoecus fasciatus Tullgren, 1901 |
status |
|
Scotinoecus fasciatus Tullgren, 1901 View in CoL
Scotinoecus fasciatus Tullgren, 1901: 183 View in CoL ; Carbonell, 1924: 184 (transcription of Tullgren’s description); Schiapelli & Gerschman, 1968: 319, figs 1–8 (Ƥ, D 3); Legendre & Calderón, 1984: 1059, pl. XX, figs 1–14 (3).
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other congeners by the smaller and more widely separated spermathecae and further from S. cinereopilosus in the absence of a darker marginal band on the sternum, from S. ruiles and S. major in the smaller apical segment of the ALS, with only 5–6 spigots. The male bulb is more rounded than in the other known males of the Scotinoecus ( S. major and S. cinereopilosus ), with a lamellar conductor.
Male, female. See Schiapelli & Gerschman (1968) and Legendre & Calderón (1984).
Specimens examined (all in MACN). Argentina: Prov. de Tierra del Fuego: entre Río Grande y Estancia “La Despedida”, Apr 1967 (E. Massoia), 1 3 5995, 1 Ƥ 5996 (labeled as “Allotypus” and “ Lectotypus ”, respectively).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scotinoecus fasciatus Tullgren, 1901
T, Duniesky Rios & Goloboff, Pablo A. 2012 |
Scotinoecus fasciatus
Legendre 1984: 1059 |
Schiapelli 1968: 319 |
Carbonell 1924: 184 |
Tullgren 1901: 183 |