Ranatra, Fabricius, 1790
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5351508 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5449489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C6879C-1037-7316-FCD4-F9C7DAD4AE81 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Ranatra |
status |
|
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF RANATRA View in CoL OCCURRING IN SINGAPORE AND PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
(modified from Lansbury, 1972)
1. Head with prominent, keel-like tubercle on vertex between the eyes ( Fig. 9 View Figs ).............................................................................2
– Head lacking prominent, keel-like tubercle on vertex between the eyes ( Fig. 10 View Figs ); if a tubercle present, then small and nodular, prominent and not keel-like....................................................4
2. Respiratory siphon short, approximately one-third the length of the abdomen; male paramere with distal hook and subapical tumescence separated by a narrow incision ( Figs. 11–14 View Figs ) ( R. gracilis View in CoL species group)............................................................3
– Respiratory siphon longer than the length of the abdomen; male paramere with distal hook and subapical tumescence separated by a broad incision ( Figs. 15, 16 View Figs )..... R. spinifrons Montandon View in CoL
3. Ventral prothoracic keel present between fore coxae but then becoming obsolescent posteriorly; body length (excluding siphon) 30–37 mm; middle femur shorter than hind femur; apex of male paramere with distal hook and subapical tubercle separated by a narrow incision, touching at their apices or nearly so ( Figs. 13, 14 View Figs )............................................. R. parmata Mayr View in CoL
– Ventral prothoracic keel running posteriorly from between fore coxae almost entire length of prothorax; body length (excluding siphon) 28–29 mm; middle and hind femora subequal in length; apex of male paramere with distal hook and subapical tubercle separated by a broader incision, apices not touching ( Figs. 11, 12 View Figs )................................................................. R. gracilis Dallas View in CoL
4. Largest tooth on fore femur lying more or less equidistant between base and tip of femur ( Fig. 29 View Figs ; R. varipes View in CoL species group)................................................................. R. varipes Stål View in CoL
– Largest tooth on fore femur lying clearly nearer to the distal end of the femora than to the base ( Figs. 27, 28 View Figs ; R. biroi View in CoL species group).......................................................................................4
5. Posterior apex of mesosternum pointed or rounded; width of fore femur measured from dorsal margin to apex of largest tooth less than the widest part of the femur basally ( Fig. 27 View Figs )........ 5
– Posterior apex of mesosternum truncate; width of fore femur measured from dorsal margin to apex of largest tooth subequal to or greater than the widest part of the femur basally ( Fig. 28 View Figs )........................................... R. rafflesi Tran & D. Polhemus View in CoL
6. Hind tibia distinctly longer than middle tibia; male paramere with a small tooth at apex of distal hook ( Figs. 19, 20 View Figs ) .......... ......................................................................... R. longipes Stål View in CoL
– Middle and hind tibiae subequal in length; male paramere without a small tooth at apex of distal hook ( Figs. 21, 22 View Figs ) ..... ........................................................................ R. thai Lansbury View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.