Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides Suessenguth (1934: 310)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.296.2.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13687982 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C83243-FFB9-FFB5-FF75-FEE6FD161B60 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides Suessenguth (1934: 310) |
status |
|
Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides Suessenguth (1934: 310) View in CoL
Holzhammer (1956) indicated the specimen “ P. G. Lorentz & G. H. Hieronymus 705” as “ typus varietatis”, but this was in fact a lectotypification since the protologue mentioned two specimens (see Art. 7.10): “ Argentinien, Sierra de Tucuman, La Cienaga, I. 1874 (G. Hieronymus et P. G. Lorentz, Flora Argent. n. 705). Paraguay, Tobati, bei Cerro Aparepy. Toniger Camp. Vulgärname „Batatilla “ wegen der batatenähnlichen Wurzelknolle (K. Fiebrig. PI. parag. n. 796)”.
Suessenguth’s types are mainly housed at M, but this particular collection was not traced, neither at M nor at B. Actually, there are duplicates of this collection at GOET (code 015489) and CORD (code 00002558) but none of both specimens bear an indication that Holzhammer has examined it. Considering the Art. 9.17, Holzhammer’s indication should be narrowed to one single specimen in a subsequent lectotypification. According to Stafleu & Cowan (1981), Lorentz types are housed at GOET, therefore the specimen GOET-015489 is designated here as a second-step lectotype of the name Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides Suessenguth (1934: 310)
Bena, Maria Julia 2017 |
Gomphrena elegans var. claussenioides
Suessenguth, K. 1934: ) |