Microhoria halophila Kejval, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2020.007 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7990B912-A3D4-40F7-B143-772FFDB5A119 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C8343F-AA05-1052-FC4A-8CC7C75DF7B8 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana (2020-06-05 21:39:17, last updated by Plazi 2023-10-31 17:24:34) |
scientific name |
Microhoria halophila Kejval |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microhoria halophila Kejval , sp. nov. ( Fig. 103 View Figs 100–104. 100 )
Type locality. Turkey, NW of Tuz Gölu Lake, Kulu env..
Type material. HOLOTYPE:, ‘ TURKEY centr., Tuz Gölu , Kulu, 29.v.1996. M. Snížek lgt. [p]’ ( NMPC) . PARATYPES: 4 2 ♀♀, same data as holotype ( ZKDC); 1, ‘ TURKEY centr., Kulu env., 14.v.2002, J. Hlásek lgt. [p]’ ( ZKDC).
Description. Male (holotype). Body length 3.1 mm. Body black, basal margin of pronotum and elytra with brownish tinge; legs dark brown, tibiae paler, reddish-brown; antennae black, unicolorous.
Head 1.2 times as long as wide, widely rounded posteriorly; eyes small, moderately convex. Surface moderately glossy, distinctly and rather densely punctate; punctures distinctly spaced; setation short, subdecumbent.Antennae slightly enlarged for apical third; antennomeres X 1.1 times, XI 2.5 times as long as wide.
Pronotum 1.1 times as long as wide, robust, slightly narrower than head including eyes, evenly rounded anteriorly, pronotal disc evenly convex, outline in dorsal view with lateral margins moderately impressed posteriorly. Surface moderately glossy, distinctly punctate; punctation and setation as on head (punctures at most slightly denser).
Elytra 1.6 times as long as wide, moderately convex, subtruncate posteriorly; humeri absent; apices modified, channel of gland forming short tubular process at apical margin. Surface moderately glossy, densely punctate; punctation shallower than on head; setation short, subdecumbent; with scattered short, suberect tactile setae.
Legs simple; all tibiae with paired terminal spurs.
Abdominal sternum VII simple or at most very slightly emarginate medially; sternum VIII forming paired subtriangular sclerites that are rather rounded posteriorly. Aedeagus ( Fig. 103 View Figs 100–104. 100 ): narrow apical portion of tegmen moderately widened subapically and hooked apically; endophallic armature with two robust and about ten slender, simple, moderately long, straight spines.
Female. Identical with male for most external characters; elytral apices simple; sternum VII distinctly emarginate apically; tergum VII truncate apically.
Variation. Body length (♀) 2.8–3.1 mm.
Differential diagnosis. Microhoria halophila sp. nov. belongs to the M. terminata species-group. It can be distinguished from all apterous/brachypterous species distributed in Anatolia by its robust appearance, dark colouration (entirely unicolorous black), and rather coarse punctation. Its aedeagus resembles that of M. inobscura stat. nov. (see Figs 103 View Figs 100–104. 100 , 109 View Figs 105–111. 105 ), but the apical hook of the tegmen is more prominent and the endophallic armature is quite different.
Etymology. From the Latin halophila (halophilous); referring to its distribution near Tuz Gölu Salt Lake; adjective.
Distribution. Turkey.
Figs 100–104. 100 – Microhoria garavuti sp. nov., aedeagus in ventral (left) and lateral (right) view; 101 – M. hazara sp. nov., aedeagus in ventral (left) and lateral (right) view; 102 – same, detail of structure of endophallus; 103 – M. halophila sp. nov. aedeagus in lateral view; 104 – M. gibbipennis sp. nov., aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bar: 0.2 mm (except 102).
Figs 105–111. 105 – Microhoria heracleana sp. nov., aedeagus in lateral view; 106 – same, apex of tegmen in dorsal view; 107 – same, apex of everted endophallus, ventral view; 108 – M. impavida sp. nov., aedeagus in lateral view; 109 – M. inobscura (Pic, 1908), stat nov., aedeagus in lateral view; 110 – same, apical part in ventral view; 111 – M. kabulensis sp. nov., aedeagus in lateral (left) and ventral (right) view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm – A (Fig. 111), B (Figs 105–109).
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |