Elasmopus nkjaf, Nakamura & Nakano & Ota & Tomikawa, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4544.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:32DE87D6-1D47-4FB6-A1A7-ABB1A1C9C03C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5935546 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D4246AE0-B657-4A79-A2D7-98EAD4F935CE |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:D4246AE0-B657-4A79-A2D7-98EAD4F935CE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Elasmopus nkjaf |
status |
sp. nov. |
Elasmopus nkjaf View in CoL sp. nov.
[New Japanese name: Miyako-iso-yokoebi]
( Figs 1–6 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )
Material examined. Holotype: KUZ Z1862 View Materials , mature male (15.3 mm) collected from Takano Fishing Port , Hirara , Miyako Island, Okinawa Pref., Ryukyu Islands, Japan (24°47′59″N, 125°20′03″E), occurring in a commercial seaweed bed of Caulerpa lentillifera on 12 March 2013, collected by Y. Ota. GoogleMaps Paratypes: KUZ Z1863 View Materials , female (9.7 mm) ; KUZ Z1864 View Materials , male (9.5 mm); NSMT-Cr 25881, male (13.0 mm); NSMT-Cr 25882, female (5.8 mm); NSMT- Cr 25883, male (10.0 mm); NSMT-Cr 25884, ovigerous female (6.4 mm); NSMT-Cr 25885, ovigerous female (4.6 mm). Data same as for the holotype .
Description of male (holotype, KUZ Z1862). Body ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) smooth, not carinate. Head ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ): eyes oval; lateral cephalic lobe broad, weakly concave, anteroventral margin with notch. Epimeral plates 1–3 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D–F) with clusters of robust setae on ventral margins, each posterior margin setose; ventral margins of epimeral plates 2 and 3 with slender setae; posterodistal corner of epimeral plates 3 notched with small acute tooth.
Antenna 1 ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ): length 0.6 × body length; peduncular articles 1 to 3 in length ratio of 0.9: 1.0: 0.6; peduncular article 1 with robust seta on posterodistal corner; posterior margin of peduncular article 2 with 3 clusters of setae and single seta; peduncular article 3 with 2 clusters of setae on posterior margin; accessory flagellum 3-articulate, reaching to middle of primary flagellar article 3; primary flagellum 42-articulate.
Antenna 2 ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ): length 0.5 × antenna 1; gland cone of peduncular article 2 not reaching to end of peduncular article 3; peduncular article 3 with robust setae on anterior submargin; peduncular article 4 slightly longer than article 5, with 1 cluster and 2 pairs of setae on posterior submargin; peduncular article 5 with 4 clusters of setae and single seta on posterior submargin; flagellum 10-articulate.
Mouthparts. Upper lip ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ) with rounded anterior margin, bearing fine setae. Mandible ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E–G) with left and right incisors 2- and 4-dentate, respectively; left lacinia mobilis 5-dentate, right lacinia mobilis bifid; accessory setal row consisting of 4 setae on each of left and right mandibles; molar process well developed, triturative; palp well developed, 3-articulate; palp article 1 longer than broad, inner distal part weakly produced; palp article 2 slightly shorter than article 3; palp article 3 strongly falcate, length 2.6 × width. Lower lip ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ) with outer lobes laterally expanded, bearing apical setae; inner lobes ovate, with apical setae. Maxilla 1 ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ) with inner plate bearing 2 plumose setae apically; outer plate with 7 robust dentate setae; palp 2-articulate, article 1 marginally bare, article 2 with numerous apical and subapical setae, its outer margin without seta. Maxilla 2 ( Fig. 2J View FIGURE 2 ) with outer and inner plates bearing long apical setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ) with inner plate bearing plumose setae apically; outer plate obovate, reaching less than half of palp article 2; palp article 2 with setae on inner margin; length of palp article 3 1.8 × length of palp article 2; nail of palp article 4 distinct.
Gnathopod 1 ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ): coxa anteroventral corner weakly produced, anterior margin weakly concave; basis with long setae on posterior margin; carpus length approximately 2 times its width, subequal in length to propodus, with slender setae on anterodistal corner and along posterdistal margin; propodus with 6 clusters of setae on anterior margin, palmar margin almost transverse, along with robust setae.
Gnathopod 2 ( Fig. 3C, D View FIGURE 3 ): coxa with setae on ventral margin; basis with long setae on posterior margin; merus with sharp posterodistal tooth bearing robust, and slender setae; carpus compressed, lobate, projecting between merus and propodus; propodus with 10 clusters of setae on anterior margin, rounded distomedial shelf with 4 medial and 6 lateral robust setae on palm, length 2.7 × length of carpus, medial face shallowly hollowed; palmar margin weakly concave, approximate two thirds length of propodus, with 1 lateral and 2 medial subacute teeth; lateral tooth large, associating with 4 medial and 6 lateral robust setae; medial teeth small, foremost medial tooth exceeding palmar margin; dactylus strongly curved, subacute, length 0.5 × length of propodus.
Pereopod 3 ( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 ): coxa longer than broad, ventral margin with numerous short and a few long setae; posterior margin of basis with long setae; posterior margin of merus with slender setae; posterior margins of carpus and propodus with robust, and slender setae, setae on anterodistal corner of propodus shorter than length of dactylus.
Pereopod 4 ( Fig. 3F View FIGURE 3 ): coxa expanded with posterior concavity, ventral margin with numerous short setae; posterior margin of basis with long setae; posterior margin of merus with slender setae; posterior margins of carpus and propodus with robust and slender setae, setae on anterodistal corner of propodus shorter than length of dactylus.
Pereopod 5 ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ): coxa bilobed, anterior lobe with 6 short setae, ventral margin of posterior lobe with 5 robust setae, posterior margin of posterior lobe with 4 small setae; posterior margin of basis straight with numerous short setae and a few slender setae; anterior margins of merus and carpus with robust setae and slender setae; anterior margin of propodus with robust setae, slender setae on posterodistal corner shorter than length of dactylus.
Pereopod 6 ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ): coxa bilobed, anterior lobe without setae, ventral margin of posterior lobe with 5 robust setae, posterior margin of posterior lobe with 4 small setae; posterior margin of basis almost straight with short, and long setae; anterior margins of merus and carpus with robust, and slender setae, posterior margins of merus and carpus with slender setae; anterior margin of propodus with robust setae, slender setae on posterodistal corner shorter than length of dactylus.
Pereopod 7 ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ): coxa rounded, with 7 small setae on posterior margin; basis expanded posteriorly, posterior margin rounded with short, and long setae; anterior margins of merus and carpus with robust, and slender setae, posterior margins of merus and carpus with slender setae; anterior margin of propodus with robust setae, slender setae on posterodistal corner shorter than length of dactylus.
Coxal gills present on gnathopod 2 and pereopods 3–6.
Pleopods ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 G–J): inner distal corner with 2 retinacula; inner basal margin of inner ramus of pleopods 1–3 with 4, 3 or 4, and 3 bifid plumose setae (clothes-pin setae), respectively.
Uropods. Uropod 1 ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ): peduncle with 1 basofacial seta, length 1.3 × length of outer ramus; outer ramus subequal in length to inner ramus, with 5, and 7 robust setae on outer, and inner margins, respectively; inner ramus with 5, and 4 robust setae on outer, and inner margins, respectively. Uropod 2 ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ): peduncle length 1.1 × length of outer ramus; outer ramus subequal in length to inner ramus, with 6 robust setae on outer and inner margins, respectively; inner ramus 2, and 4 robust setae on outer, and inner margins, respectively. Uropod 3 ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ): peduncle length 0.9 × length of outer ramus; rami distally truncated; outer ramus length 1.1 × length of inner ramus, with 3 clusters, and 1 cluster of robust setae on outer, and inner margins, respectively; inner ramus with 2 pairs of robust setae on inner margin.
Telson ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ): length 1.2 × width, cleft for 85% of length; inner apical lobes weakly longer than outer apical cusps, each lobe with 2 minute setae laterally, distal part with 2¯3 robust setae and single small seta subapically.
Description of female (paratype, KUZ Z1863). Epimeral plate 3 ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) with ventral margin lacking slender setae. Gnathopod 1 ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ): basis with long setae on medial surface; propodus with 4 clusters of setae on anterior margin. Gnathopod 2 ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ): merus with sharp posterodistal tooth bearing slender setae; carpus not compressed, without posterodistal lobe; propodus with 6 clusters of, and 1 pair of setae, plus single seta on anterodistal margin, length 1.6 × length of carpus; palmar margin almost transverse, along with robust setae and 3 defined robust setae; dactylus weakly curved. Uropod 3 ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ): inner ramus with 2 robust setae on subproximal inner margin, 1 cluster of robust setae on subdistal outer margin. Telson ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 ): length 1.3 × width, cleft for 78 % of length; inner apical lobes developed, elongate, each lobe with 1 minute seta laterally, distal part with 2 long, and 1 short robust setae, plus 1 short seta.
Variation. Epimeral plate 3, ventral margin with or without slender setae; telson, inner apical lobes weakly or much longer than outer apical cusps, length of apical robust setae short, or long; eggs, 4–8.
Etymology. The specific name is from the Miyako word for the seaweed Caulerpa lentillifera , the habitat of the new species; thus not a Latin or Latinized word.
Sequences and COI genetic distances. In total eight nucleotide sequences were determined: holotype (KUZ Z1862), four sequences, 28S ( LC215811 View Materials ; 1194 bp), H3 ( LC215815 View Materials ; 328 bp), COI ( LC215813 View Materials ; 658 bp), and 16S ( LC215809 View Materials ; 417 bp); and paratype (KUZ Z1864), four sequences, 28S ( LC215810 View Materials ; 1194 bp), H3 ( LC215814 View Materials ; 328 bp), COI ( LC215812 View Materials ; 658 bp), and 16S ( LC215808 View Materials ; 417 bp).
The COI genetic diversity within the newly obtained two COI sequences ( LC215812 View Materials , LC215813 View Materials ) was 0.6% (4/658). Based on the 653–658 bp aligned sequences, the COI uncorrected p -distance between E. nkjaf and the Portuguese E. rapax was 16.0–16.7% (mean = 16.2%).
Remarks. Elasmopus nkjaf is most similar to E. rapax in having the following characteristics: posteroventral corner of epimeral plate 3 notched; short setae on posterior margins of peduncular articles 1–3 of antenna 1 and peduncular articles 4–5 of antenna 2; propodus of male gnathopod 2 with distomedial shelf bearing robust setae and 3 teeth on palm; posterior margin of basis of pereopod 7 with long setae; and both inner and outer rami of uropod 3 almost isometry. However, E. nkjaf differs from the neotype of E. rapax in the following four morphological features (features of the true E. rapax in parentheses): 1) foremost medial tooth on palm of propodus of male gnathopod 2 exceeding palmar margin (not exceeding); 2) distomedial shelf of propodus of male gnathopod 2 with 4 medial and 6 lateral robust setae (2 medial and 4 lateral); 3) posterodistal setae on propodi of pereopods 5–7 shorter than length of dactyli (longer); and 4) basis of male pereopod 7 more expanded, length 1.3 × width (1.5). Additionally, the mean COI distance between E. nkjaf , and the amphipods identified as E. rapax from Portugal was 16.2%. Therefore, we concluded that the present specimens are not conspecific with E. rapax .
Elasmopus nkjaf View in CoL could be distinguished from the other rapax View in CoL -group species, which possess long setae on ventral margin of epimeral plate 3 in male ( Vader & Krapp-Schickel 2012; Gouillieux & Sorbe 2015), by the following combinations of the characters: gland cone of peduncular article 2 of antenna 2 not reaching to end of peduncular article 3 (exceeding in E. thalyae Gouillieux & Sorbe, 2015 View in CoL ); propodus of gnathopod 1 facially setose (poorly setose in E. vishakhapatnamensis Kanakadurga et al., 1981 ); length of propodus of male gnathopod 2 shorter than 3 times as long as length of carpus (longer than 4 times in E. arafura Hughes & Lowry, 2011 View in CoL , E. hooheno View in CoL , E. integer Myers, 1989 View in CoL , E. lecroyae García-Madrigal, 2010 View in CoL , E. mayo Barnard, 1979 View in CoL , and E. molokai Barnard, 1970 View in CoL ); medial face of propodus of male gnathopod 2 shallowly hollowed (deeply hollowed in E. tiburoni Barnard, 1979 View in CoL ); posterior margin of epimeral plate 3 without denticles (with denticles in E. bampo Barnard, 1979 View in CoL ).
An alien isopod species Paracerceis sculpta ( Holmes, 1904) View in CoL was recorded from a commercial seaweed bed at the type locality of E. nkjaf ( Ota 2014) View in CoL . Elasmopus View in CoL species, e.g. E. rapax View in CoL and E. pectenicrus View in CoL , have often been recorded as an introduced species (e.g. Sezgin et al. 2007; Hughes & Lowry 2010). Therefore, it is possible that E. nkjaf View in CoL may be also non-native species in Miyako Island. Further molecular study based on the full-range of the Elasmopus View in CoL species is necessary to reveal whether E. nkaf is an alien species or not.
KUZ |
Zoological Collection of the Kyoto University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Elasmopus nkjaf
Nakamura, Yasuhiro, Nakano, Takafumi, Ota, Yuzo & Tomikawa, Ko 2019 |
Elasmopus nkjaf
Nakamura & Nakano & Ota & Tomikawa 2019 |
E. thalyae
Gouillieux & Sorbe 2015 |
E. nkjaf (
Ota 2014 |
E. arafura
Hughes & Lowry 2011 |
E. lecroyae García-Madrigal, 2010
Garcia-Madrigal 2010 |
E. integer
Myers 1989 |
E. vishakhapatnamensis
Kanakadurga 1981 |
E. mayo
Barnard 1979 |
E. tiburoni
Barnard 1979 |
E. bampo
Barnard 1979 |
E. hooheno
Barnard 1970 |
E. molokai
Barnard 1970 |
Paracerceis sculpta (
Holmes 1904 |
rapax
Costa 1853 |
Elasmopus
Costa 1853 |
E. rapax
Costa 1853 |
Elasmopus
Costa 1853 |