Ancylosis rhodochrella, Herrich-Schaffer, 1852
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5197.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CCE28335-B063-47A5-8EFA-904B5B5BC99B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8190662 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C8791F-FF9E-806C-FF78-526CFCC258F7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ancylosis rhodochrella |
status |
|
132. Ancylosis rhodochrella View in CoL (Herrich-Schäffer, 1852: fig. 151 (vol. 4, 1852 [(1847–1855) [1849]), p. 147 (vol. 6, 1855 [(1843–1856) [1856])) ( Myelois )
Type locality: Turkey, Amasya
= Canthelia [sic] lucida Warren, 1888: 336
Type locality: Pakistan, Province Punjab, “Campbellpore” [Attock]
= Heterographis microstictella Hampson, 1903b: 23
Type locality: India, Gujarat, Deesa
Distribution. Indian records: Gujarat, Deesa ( Hampson 1903b), Punjab ( Singh et al. 2019d). Global records: Saudi Arabia ( Amsel 1958a), Cyprus ( Amsel 1958b, Arenberger 1994), Iran ( Amsel 1961), Spain, Russia, Georgia, Turkey ( Bidzilya et al. 2020), Pakistan: Punjab ( Warren, 1888).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ancylosis rhodochrella
Singh, Navneet, Ranjan, Rahul, Talukdar, Avishek, Joshi, Rahul, Kirti, Jagbir Singh, Chandra, Kailash & Mally, Richard 2022 |
Heterographis microstictella
Hampson, G. F. 1903: 23 |
Canthelia [sic] lucida
Warren, W. 1888: 336 |