Hymenoepimecis manauara Pádua & Oliveira, 2015

Pádua, Diego G., Oliveira, Marcio L., Onody, Helena C., Sobczak, Jober F., Sääksjärvi, Ilari E. & Gómez, Isrrael C., 2015, The Brazilian Amazonian species of Hymenoepimecis Viereck, 1912 (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae), Zootaxa 4058 (2), pp. 175-194 : 185-187

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4058.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6857F19D-44C3-4264-9E89-A4232D62D23E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6114318

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887C9-FFD2-FF81-0FA9-2706ACE6758C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hymenoepimecis manauara Pádua & Oliveira
status

sp. nov.

Hymenoepimecis manauara Pádua & Oliveira sp. n.

( Figs 48–52 View FIGURES 48 – 52 )

Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished from all other Hymenoepimecis by the combination of the following characters: 1) hyaline wing; 2) hind leg orange, with apex of femur, tibia and tarsus blacks; 3) metasoma orange, with posterior margins of tergites II–IV narrowly black, tergites V+ black; 4) female with ovipositor 1.1–1.3 × as long as hind tibia.

Description. Female. Body [8.9] 7.0– 13.3 mm; face [0.9] 0.8–0.9 × as broad as high (from supraclypeal suture to base of antenna), smooth, slightly convex with few spaced bristles; head in dorsal view with genae strongly narrowed behind eyes; ocelli inserted at an elevation, posterior ocelli separated from eyes by [0.6] 0.6–0.75 × its own maximum diameter; occipital carina projected, slightly curved upwards in the mediodorsal part. Pronotum long, smooth and polished, with distance from tegula to head is greater than [0.62] 0.6–0.7 × distance from tegula to hind margin of propodeum with an anteriorly, and opening pocket-like structure not reduced longitudinally; mesoscutum smooth and polished; scutellum, in profile, convex; mesopleurona smooth and polished, with anterodorsal and posterodorsal parts bearing sparse, fine setiferous punctures; metapleuron smooth and polished, rather uniformly covered with sparse, fine setiferous punctures. Fore wing with [7.2] 6.0– 9.3 mm; cu-a more or less interstitial to the base Rs&M; 2 rs-m [0.3] 0.3–0.5 × as long as abscissa of M between 2 rs-m and 2 m-cu; abscissa of Cu 1 meeting 1 m-cu equidistant between Cu 1 a and Cu 1 b; hind wing with [4.8] 4.4–6.4 mm; abscissa of Cu 1 meting cu-a equidistant between M and 1 A. Hind leg with tibia + tarsus [0.6] 0.6–0.8 × the fore wing length; tarsal claw with more or less quadrangular, with apex slightly overtaking the lobe. Metasoma slender; tergite I [2.0] 1.7–2.0 × as long as posteriorly broad, centrally quite strongly convex with lateral carinae only present at extreme anterior end flanking the anterior concavity; sternite I with a low, rounded swelling posteriorly; tergite II [1.57] 1.3–1.8 × as long as posteriorly broad; tergites III–IV [1.6] 1.2–1.7 × as long as posteriorly broad; ovipositor [1.28] 1.1–1.3 × as long as hind tibia.

Coloration. Head black; clypeus yellowish, with base slightly black; mouthparts yellowish, with apex mandible black; antenna brown. Mesosoma orange. Anterior and median leg orange, the hind leg orange, with apex of femur, tibia and tarsus blacks. Wings hyaline; pterostigma brown. Metasoma orange, with tergites VI+, and with weak black lateral marks on posterior margins of tergites II–IV, tergite V with posterior half black; ovipositor pale in median part with brownish apex, sheath brown.

Male. ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 48 – 52 ). Similar to female in structure and coloration, but with tarsal claw simple; body with 6.1–9.6 mm; fore wing with 4.4–7.4 mm; face 0.9–1.1 × as broad as high. Genital capsule ( Figs 74–76 View FIGURES 71 – 82 ): Paramere rounded apically, slightly narrowed than the parameral lamina, with bristles in apicodorsal margin; parameral lamina with bristles spaced, except in posterior margin; volsellar lamina with bristles in dorsolateral margin; cuspis with tooth and bristle in apical margin; digitus 0.35 × the length of cuspis + volsellar lamina, with tooth in apex, enlarged apically and angulated basally; aedeagus (including aedeagal apodeme) 0.9 × the length of paramere + parameral lamina (including parameral apodeme).

Distribution. Brazil (Amazonas, Pará, Rondônia) (Fig. 53).

Biological notes. Host unknown.

Etymology. The specific name refers to the name given to people born in the city of Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil.

Type material. Holotype ♀. BRAZIL, Amazonas: Manaus, Reserva 1208, Fazenda Esteio, PDBFF, 02°22’34’’S / 59°52’39’’W, 27.viii.1985, Malaise (Bert Klein), INPA. Paratypes: Amazonas: Manaus Reserva 1208, Fazenda Esteio, PDBFF, 02°22’34’’S / 59°52’39’’W, 28.v.1985, Malaise (Bert Klein), 1 female, INPA; idem, but 27.viii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 01.x.1985, 1 male, INPA; idem, but 17.ix.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 06.viii.1985, 1 male, INPA; idem, but 16.vii.1985, 1 male (with the genitalia extracted), INPA; idem, but 12.xi.1985, 2 females, INPA; idem, but 16.iv.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 01.v.1984, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 17.xii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 19.x.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 03.xii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 26.xi.1985, 1 male, INPA; idem, but 30.vii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 20.viii.1985, 2 females, INPA; idem, but 21.v.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 01.x.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 16.vii.1985, 2 females, INPA; idem, but 03.xii.1985, 1 male, INPA; idem, but 05.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 25.i.1986, 0 0 0 3168, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 17.vi.1986, 1 female, INPA; idem, but Reserva 1210, 02°22’36’’S / 59°51’21’’W, iii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 14.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 05.ix.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 25.iv.1985, 1 male (with the genitalia extracted), INPA; idem, but 19.vi.1986, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 08.viii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 14.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 12.ix.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 12.viii.1985, 1 male, INPA; idem, but Reserva 1301, 02°23’03’’S / 59°51’15’’W, 09.x.1985, 1 male (without genitalia) and 1 female, INPA; idem, but 13.ii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 02.x.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 19.vi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 25.ix.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 31.vii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 22.v.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 12.vi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 21.viii.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 13.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 08.v.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 20.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but 24.iv.1985, 1 female, MZUSP; idem, but 09.x.1985, 1 female, MPEG; idem, but 28.v.1985, 1 male (with the genitalia extracted), INPA; idem, but Reserva 1112, 02°23’32’’S / 59°52’39’’W, 25.iii.1987, 1 female, INPA; idem, but Reserva 1113, 07.xi.1985, 1 female, INPA; idem, but Reserva Ducke, Igarapé Bolívia, 10.ii.2003, Malaise (J.M.F. Ribeiro), 1 female, INPA; Carauari, Igarapé, vii.2005, Malaise (A. Henriques & Xavier Filho), 1 female, INPA; Querari, São Gabriel da Cachoeira, 2° Pel. Esp. de Fronteira, 01°05’N / 69°51’W, 05.iv–27.v.1993, Malaise (Vidal, J.; Ferreira, R.L.M.), 0 0 65247, 1 female, INPA; Pará: Belém, Mocambo, 30.ix.2011, Malaise (Rocha, J.; Santos, I.), 1 female, MPEG; Juruti, Acampamento Mutum, P29, 23– 28.ii.2008, Malaise (O.T. Ribeiro et al.), 1 female, MPEG; idem, but Estrada Mutum/Mauari, 07.xii.2008 (without collector), 1 female, MPEG; idem, but Trevo Mauari/Galileia, P. 10, 28.ii–04.iii.2008 (O.T. Ribeiro, Penna & Nazareno), 1 female, MPEG; idem, but Mauari, P 29, 15.i.2009 (without collector), 1 female, MPEG; Repartimento, Vicinal 0 8, 04°26’42’’S / 49°54’25’’W, 28.xi.2001, Malaise (J.A. Rafael & J. Vidal), 1 female, INPA; Rondônia: Candeias do Jamari, Votorantim III, 13.vii.2008, Malaise (without collector), 1 female, INPA; Porto Velho, Rio Madeira, AHE Jirau, Transects T10–T12, 09°35’53,10’’S / 65°22’0,10’’W, 09–20.ix.2010, Malaise (Silva, R.R. & Albuquerque E.Z.), 1 female, MZUSP; idem, but Área Mutum, Transects M5–M7, 09°35’29,5’’S / 65°02’57,6’’W, 17.vi–01.vii.2012 (Sanhudo, C.E.D. & Andriolli, F.), 1 male, MZUSP. Total: 8 males and 55 females.

Comments. Hymenoepimecis manauara sp. n. closely resembles H. japi Sobczak, Loffredo, Penteado-Dias & Gonzaga, 2009 , mainly by having weak black lateral marks on posterior margins of tergites II–V and by having sternite I with a low, rounded swelling posteriorly. It differ from it by hyaline wings, hind leg orange with apex of femur, tibia and tarsus blacks, and by hind leg with tibia + tarsus 0.6–0.8 × the fore wing length. H. japi presented fuscous wings, hind legs blackish, with the base of coxa orange and hind leg with tibia + tarsus 0.5 × the fore wing length.

INPA

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia

MZUSP

Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo

MPEG

Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF