Nudopella pseudoperta, Papp, László, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.63.4.377.2017 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CD971D70-4983-4CEE-AA62-6C722A0BE1EA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA1820-FFB8-5F7B-1CEC-5820FE13D18F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Nudopella pseudoperta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nudopella pseudoperta View in CoL sp. n.
(Figs 86–93)
Holotype ( HNHM): male, RSA: 1 male: EasternCapeProv., Hogsback , Mistyfell House, No. 2, on compost, GPS02, S32° 34’ 41.0’’ E26° 55’ 23.9’’, 1375 m, Jan 7, 2007, L. Papp & M. Földvári. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 1 male (rightwingseparated, gluedbelowthespecimen, genitaliainaplas- ticmicrovial) ( HNHM): RSA: EasternCapeProv., besideBloukransRiver, Jan 14, GPS17, S33° 57’ 20.9’’ E23° 38’ 18.8’’, 28 m, No. 24, L. Papp & M. Földvári GoogleMaps ; 1 female ( HNHM): Kwa- ZuluNatal, SDrakensberg, nrGardenCastle, riversidemeadow [MlambonjaRiver], Jan 22, No. 34, GPS21, S29° 44’ 59.4’’ E29° 12’ 42.1’’, 1811 m GoogleMaps ; 1 male, 1 female ( HNHM): ibid., GardenCastle, alongMlambonjaRiver, No. 33 GoogleMaps . 2 males, 4 females ( BMSA) : 1 male: Malaise trapsdenseLeucosedeadominatedscrub – RSA: FreeState , Harrismith , Scotlandfarmat : 28° 58’ 59.5’’S 29° 37’ 09.8’’E, 10–12.xi.2009, A.H. Kirk- Spriggs – [blue] Entomology Dept ....- BMSA (D) GoogleMaps 12925; 1 male, 3 females ( BMSA): ibid., KZN, Royal Natal N.P., Thendele, 1600m, 28° 42.378’S 28° 56.083’E, 15–17.ii.2010 – [blue] Entomology Dept ....- BMSA (D) GoogleMaps 21524 (m), 21536, 20511, 21521; 1 female ( BMSA): Malaise trap, Oubrug, Storms Rivier margin, indigenousforest – RSA: TsitsikammaN.P., PlaatbosNat. Reserveat: 33° 59.283’S 23° 55.275’E, 20–22.i.2009 – [blue] Entomology Dept ....- BMSA (D) GoogleMaps 03756.
Size (inmm): bodylength 1.59 (holotype), 1.36–1.76 (paratypes), winglength 1.54 (holotype), 1.54–1.82 (paratypes), wingwidth 0.66 (holotype), 0.65–0.73 (paratypes).
Description. Genalsetanotlongerthanfirstperistomal. Wing. Longestsetaonfirst costalsection 0.11–0.12 mm. rce 1 llshaded, definitelybrownish. Cs2 0.55 mm, Cs3 0.35 mm, costal ratio 1.56. Costal vein extending tip of R 4+5 by 0.13 mm. RM-MM section of vein M 1+2 0.18 mm, cross- vein M-M 0.11 mm. M 3+4 with a long appendage vein to discal cell 0.12 mm. Hindtibiawithadorsalpreapicalsetalongerthantibialdiameteratitsorigin.
Malesternite 5 (Fig. 86) simple, caudalmembranouspartveryshortandbare. Male synsternite (Fig. 90) slightly different in structure from that of N. erratica , as the laterally longersternite 6. Malegenitalia (Figs 87–93) withlarge, broadlyroundedcercus (Fig. 87), sagittal connection very short; cercus with some setae. Subepandrial sclerite (Figs 87, 89) moreroundedandshort. Surstylus (Figs 92–93) short, itslobeswithalargeroundcaudal lobeanditssubapicallobeclosetoapicalthorn. Postgonite (Fig. 91) stronglycurved, apex notsharp.
Etymology. The specific epithet of this new species is ‘ pseudoperta ’ as a combination of the Greek words ‘ pseudes ’ [= false] and the specific epithet of operta , a species described byRohÁčeKandMArShALL (1986) fromKorea.
Comments. RohÁčeKandMArShALL’s (1986) descriptionof T. (N.) operta isveryaccurate, whathelpsfurtherstudiesinthegenus. PAPP (2008 b) identifiedhis Nudopella specimensfromSouthAfricaincorrectly, usinglowmagnification. Acarefulstudyofthosespecimensrevealedthreedifferentspecies from Nudopella on material collected on dung of big hoofers in South Africa. These species occur together with N. erratica (see No. 33 of the RSA materials above). This, ofcourse, ischallengingforproperdiscriminationofthespecies, butreinforcestheconceptthattheyareseparatespecies. Themalesternite 5 in N. pseudoperta , sp. n. issomewhatlargerthaninitscongeners. Themale synsterniteisstructurallysimilartothatof N. erratica , differingonlyindetails, e.g., sternite 6 portionislongerlaterally. Thesurstylusin N. pseudoperta , sp. n. is shorter than in N. marshalli and about as long as that of N. erratica , but the lobesaredifferent.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |