Kuatunittia, Volynkin & Saldaitis, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2023.68.14 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AAC1A7FA-3259-454E-A278-EE4F64426DD1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13247795 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D00B6BA1-EF3E-4613-82F6-ABC78B1B0CDE |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:D00B6BA1-EF3E-4613-82F6-ABC78B1B0CDE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Kuatunittia |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Kuatunittia View in CoL gen. n.
https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8E7CF9C3-A15C-43EC-A251-F14016FD23E3
Type species: Systropha klapperichi Daniel, 1954 , by present designation.
Diagnosis. Species of the new genus ( Figs 7–10 View Figures 1–8 View Figures 9–18 , 23–26 View Figures 23–26 ) are externally reminiscent of Fangeilema gen. n. ( Figs 1–6 View Figures 1–8 , 19–22 View Figures 19–22 ) but differ in the distally bilobate saccular process. In the female genitalia, Kuatunittia gen. n. ( Fig. 34 View Figures 31–34 ) is distinguished from Fangeilema gen. n. ( Figs 31, 32 View Figures 31–34 ) by the conical appendix bursae directed posteriorly (it is sack-like and directed laterally in Fangeilema gen. n.), and the presence of the band-like signum (whereas species of Fangeilema gen. n. have round signa or lack them).
The similar bilobate sacculus is found in two other Asiatic Lithosiina genera, Pseudoscaptia Hampson, 1914 ( Figs 13, 14 View Figures 9–18 ) and Teuloma Volynkin & N. Singh, 2019 ( Figs 17, 18 View Figures 9–18 ), but the former genus ( Fig. 28 View Figures 27–30 ) differs from Kuatunittia gen. n. in the asymmetrical sacculi sparsely covered with tiny spikes (they are symmetrical and densely covered with setae in Kuatunittia gen. n.), the weakly sclerotised phallus carina (it is heavily sclerotised and bearing a cluster of setae in the new genus), and the vesica having a sclerotised and spinulose subbasal diverticulum. The female genitalia of Kuatunittia gen. n. differ clearly from Pseudoscaptia ( Fig. 36 View Figures 35–38 ) in the symmetrical and smooth 7 th abdominal sternite lacking the antevaginal plate (it is asymmetrical and laterally rugose in Pseudoscaptia ), and the narrow and symmetrical ductus bursae, which is broad and strongly asymmetrical in Pseudoscaptia . Compared to Teuloma ( Fig. 30 View Figures 27–30 ), the male genital capsule of Kuatunittia gen. n. has a markedly shorter and narrower vinculum, a juxta lacking the tubular and rugose dorsal extension (a feature characteristic of Teuloma ), and a markedly broader distal saccular process having a larger, setose and more proximally situated proximal lobe. The phallus of Kuatunittia gen. n. is shorter and narrower than in Teuloma and has a considerably longer coecum. The vesica of Kuatunittia gen. n. is substantially shorter than in Teuloma and bears a sclerotised serrulate plate distally whereas it is granulose without plates and cornuti in Teuloma . The female genitalia of Kuatunittia gen. n. are distinguished from Teuloma ( Fig. 38 View Figures 35–38 ) by the lack of the antrum, the markedly narrower and straight ductus bursae (it is curved in Teuloma ), the larger and sack-like corpus bursae (it is more or less globular in Teuloma ), and the shorter and conical appendix bursae directed posteriorly whereas it is medially helicoid, distally dilated and directed distally in Teuloma .
Etymology. The genus name is an aggregate of the historical toponym Kuatun which is the type locality of the type species, and the genus-group name Wittia . Gender is feminine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.