Dasydorylas gibber, Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.932.2517 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1137F37F-AF51-44E2-8D3E-3C68992029A5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11127162 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE8793-8033-804C-FD81-84A7FB01FD9D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dasydorylas gibber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dasydorylas gibber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6813D205-09E6-432E-A976-0446F6DB3CC3
Figs 14–26 View Figs 14–26 , 53 View Fig
Diagnosis
Postpedicel with aristiform apex. Tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally. Surstyli subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length; both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus with apex truncated and left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view. Apex of phallic guide with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view. Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth in lateral view.
Etymology
From the Latin ʻ gibber ʼ (= ʻhumpʼ), in reference to the shape of the lobe on the dorsal margin of the phallic guide in the male genitalia.
Type material
Holotype COLOMBIA – Boyacá • ♂; “ SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque , Cab.[Cabaña] Mamaramos ; 05°25′ N, 73°27′ W; 2855 m [eters]; 23.May [V]– 08.Jun [VI].2000; P. Reina leg.”; IAvH (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerine, both pinned along with the specimen GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Body length 4.8 mm, Wing length 5.8 mm.
HEAD ( Figs 14–15 View Figs 14–26 ). Eyes contiguous for 19 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.4, 0.2. Frontal triangle dark brown, brown pruinose, with callus shiny dark brown. Occiput brown, brown pruinose.Antenna ( Fig. 16 View Figs 14–26 ) scape brown, with one seta dorsally; pedicel dark brown, with four setae dorsally and two ventrally; postpedicel with aristiform apex. LPP/WPP = 5.6.
THORAX ( Figs 15, 17 View Figs 14–26 ). Postpronotal lobe dark brown, brown pruinose, with four long setae along upper margin. Scutum, ground color brown, brown pruinose, with one spot black anteriorly and dorsocentral setae conspicuous. Notopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum concolorous with scutum, with six long, stout and black setae in the posterior margin. Mesopleuron and mediotergite concolorous with notopleuron.
WING ( Fig. 18 View Figs 14–26 ). Length 5.8 mm. LW/MWW = 3.2; LTC/LFC = 0.8. Membrane brown infuscated, vein M 1 slightly curved upward. Halter stem and knob completely beige ventrally, brown dorsally, except beige medial third of stem.
LEGS ( Figs 14–15 View Figs 14–26 ). Coxae dark brown, gray-brown pruinose; fore trochanter brown; mid and hind trochanters brown, except brownish yellow distal third; femora dark brown, gray-brown pruinose, except brownish yellow apices, femora with conspicuous ctenidia and a row of long setae anterolaterally and posterolaterally; tibiae dark brown, with bases and apices brownish yellow; tarsomeres 1–5 yellowish brown; pulvilli brownish yellow.
ABDOMEN ( Figs 14–15, 19 View Figs 14–26 ). Ground color velvety dark brown, with conspicuous scattered setae; tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose; tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 20 View Figs 14–26 . Syntergosternite 8 brown, gray-brown pruinose, slightly shorter than tergite 5, with a membranous area apically ( Fig. 19 View Figs 14–26 ).
TERMINALIA ( Figs 20–26 View Figs 14–26 ). Epandrium and surstyli yellowish brown ( Fig. 21 View Figs 14–26 ). Surstyli ( Figs 21–23 View Figs 14–26 ) subsymmetrical, equal to epandrium length in dorsal view. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins slightly straight, and outer margins curved in dorsal view; right surstylus thicker than left, with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex rounded ( Fig. 21 View Figs 14–26 ); right surstylus with apex truncated; left surstylus with apex slightly rounded in lateral view ( Figs 22–23 View Figs 14–26 ). Gonopods asymmetrical, right gonopod thicker than left in ventral view ( Fig. 24 View Figs 14–26 ). Apex of phallic guide stout, with apex hook-shaped, with stout and rigid lobe dorsally and translucid lobes lateroapically in lateral view ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ). Ejaculatory apodeme parasol-shaped ( Fig. 26 View Figs 14–26 ). Phallus trifid, thin, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ).
Female
Unknown.
Geographical distribution
Colombia (Boyacá) ( Fig. 53 View Fig ).
Habitat
The specimen was collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of cloud Andean forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia.
Remarks
Based on males and due to the shape of surstyli, D. gibber sp. nov. ( Fig. 21 View Figs 14–26 ) is similar in appearance to D. colombiensis sp. nov. ( Fig. 8 View Figs 1–13 ). It differs from D. colombiensis sp. nov. by having the tergite 1 completely brown pruinose, with four black and long setae laterally; tergites 2–4 with distal margins yellowish brown pruinose, tergite 5 dark brown, brown pruinose dorsally, yellowish brown pruinose laterally ( Figs 14–15, 19 View Figs 14–26 ) (vs tergite 1–5 brown, brown pruinose, with distal margin gray pruinose dorsolaterally, interrupted medially, in D. colombiensis sp. nov.; Figs 1–2, 6 View Figs 1–13 ); left surstylus with apex slightly rounded when seen in lateral view ( Fig. 22 View Figs 14–26 ) (vs left surstylus with apex sinuous when seen in lateral view; Fig. 9 View Figs 1–13 ); apex of phallic guide with a translucid lobe lateroapically and a stout rigid lobe dorsally in lateral view ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ) (vs apex of phallic guide with upper margin slightly sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally; Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ); phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal fifth ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ) (vs phallus with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal half; Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |