Aedes africanus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.166051 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CF6EE39-1E13-4F82-BBF7-F7F8D77340D2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5616480 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87C5-FF91-E50F-0B26-FAD85E529D9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Aedes africanus |
status |
|
THE AFRICANUS View in CoL GROUP
(male of maxgermaini unknown)
15(9). Hindfemur anteriorly with a large pale band at base and with 2 large, white patches on median and apical areas ( Huang 1990, Figs. 8 View FIGURE 8 A, B) ....... luteocephalus Hindfemur anteriorly without such a pale band at base, or hindfemur anteriorly with 3 large, white patches on basal, median and apical areas ( Huang 1990, Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A, B, C; 4A, B, C; 5C; 6A, B, C; 7B, D; 8C) .................................................... 16
16(15). Posterior dorsocentral yellow line of narrow scales well developed, reaching forward to the posterior end of the fossal white patch; lateral lobe of scutellum with broad dark scales ( Huang 1990, Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 C) ................................................. ruwenzori
Posterior dorsocentral yellow line of narrow scales not developed or, if present, not reaching to the posterior end of the fossal white patch; lateral lobe of scutellum with broad white scales ( Huang 1990, Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 A; 3A, D; 5A, D; 7A)............ 17
17(16). Posterior dorsocentral yellow or white line of narrow scales present ( Huang 1990, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, D; 7A) ................................................................................................... 18
Posterior dorsocentral yellow or white line of narrow scales not developed ( Huang 1990, Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 A; 3A, D) ......................................................................................... 20
18(17). Fossal white patch rather broad at base along scutal margin; prescutellar line well developed, with narrow yellow scales and with some broad, flat, metallic silvery white scales posteriorly ( Huang 1990, Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A) ............................................... opok Fossal white patch rather narrow at base along scutal margin; prescutellar line not developed or, if present, with only narrow yellow scales ( Huang 1990, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, D) .............................................................................................................................. 19
19(18). Anterior median white stripe rather long, 2.5–3.0 times as long as wide; hindleg with tarsal claws equal and simple ( Huang 1990, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 D, E) ...... pseudoafricanus Anterior median white stripe short and broad, about 2 times as long as long as wide; hindleg with tarsal claws equal and toothed ( Huang 1990, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, B) ....... ............................................................................................................ maxgermaini
20(17). Hindtibia with a white stripe on ventral surface in basal 0.20 or more; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, the smaller one toothed, the larger one simple; hindleg with tarsal claws equal and toothed ( Huang 1990, Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A, B, C; 4A; 3B, C).................................................................................................................... 21 Hindtibia without, or with a very short white stripe on ventral surface in basal 0.08 or less; male fore and midlegs with tarsal claws unequal, all simple; hindleg with tarsal claws equal and simple ( Huang 1990, Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 B, C; 3E, F) ..................... ............................................................................................................. neoafricanus
21(20). Hindfemur with 3 large, white patches on the anterior surface (on basal, median and apical areas) ( Huang 1990, Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 C; 4A)........................................... africanus Hindfemur with at most 2 large, white patches on the anterior surface (on median and apical areas) ( Huang 1990, Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A, B) ................................................. corneti
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Stegomyia |