Pamphobeteus Pocock 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.183116 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5631132 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF87D5-0D07-693B-28D7-FDF44DC6FB2D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pamphobeteus Pocock 1901 |
status |
|
Pamphobeteus Pocock 1901 View in CoL View at ENA
Lasiodora View in CoL (ad part): Ausserer 1875: 192 –194; Simon 1888: 403–404.
Pamphobeteus Pocock 1901: 545 View in CoL ; Pocock 1903: 91 –93; Roewer 1942: 251 –252; Bonnet 1958: 251; Schiapelli & Gerschman de Pikelin 1979: 295–296, Figs 25–31; Pérez-Miles et al. 1996: 54; Brignoli 1983: 133, 139; Platnick 2008.
Type species: – Lasiodora nigricolor Ausserer 1875 ; by original designation.
Diagnosis: – Pamphobeteus is most similar to Xenesthis Simon in males having an embolus with concave/ convex aspect in conjunction with the presence of a well developed apical keel that extends largely by the embolous edge, a well developed retrolateral keel ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ), and metatarsus I folding between the tibial spur processes ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ); females have spermathecae largely fused, but still presenting vestiges of the two spermathecae in the distal region ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). Males and females can further be distinguished from Xenesthis by having the scopulae on metatarsi IV restricted to apical portion.
Distribution: – The species occurs in northwestern South American ( Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Brazil) ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pamphobeteus Pocock 1901
Bertani, Rogério, Fukushima, Caroline Sayuri & Júnior, Pedro Ismael Da Silva 2008 |
Pamphobeteus
Perez-Miles 1996: 54 |
Bonnet 1958: 251 |
Roewer 1942: 251 |
Pocock 1903: 91 |
Pocock 1901: 545 |
Lasiodora
Ausserer 1875: 192 |