Hypocryphalus robustus, (Eichhoff, 1872)

Johnson, Andrew J., Knížek, Miloš, Atkinson, Thomas H., Jordal, Bjarte H., Ploetz, Randy C. & Hulcr, Jiri, 2017, Resolution of a Global Mango and Fig Pest Identity Crisis, Insect Systematics and Diversity 1 (2), pp. 1-10 : 6

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1093/isd/ixx010

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4551531

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D0E238-F71D-FFB3-0B5D-FC6780D8598A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hypocryphalus robustus
status

 

H. robustus ( Eichhoff, 1872)

C. robustus Eichhoff, 1872 .

H. robustus is recognized as a valid species without any junior synonyms based on the differences described above. Even though the antennal funicle has four segments, the species is not transferred back to the genus Cryphalus View in CoL because of the difficulties found coding the character, and the dubious distinction between the two genera.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Curculionidae

Genus

Hypocryphalus

Loc

Hypocryphalus robustus

Johnson, Andrew J., Knížek, Miloš, Atkinson, Thomas H., Jordal, Bjarte H., Ploetz, Randy C. & Hulcr, Jiri 2017
2017
Loc

Cryphalus

in Tsai and Li (Tsai and Li 1963
1963
Loc

C. robustus

Eichhoff 1872
1872
Loc

H. robustus

Eichhoff 1872
1872
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF