Abana gigas ( Fowler, 1898 )

Sauceda-V, Jefferson, Malenovský, Igor & Takiya, Daniela M., 2025, Species delimitation and taxonomic revision of Abana Distant, 1908 (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Proconiini): Intraspecific color variation and pseudocryptic diversity in Andean sharpshooters, Zootaxa 5596 (1), pp. 1-60 : 23-26

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5596.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF876CCB-164A-4E2E-9CB1-1DBED7E3E505

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187DF-5B08-3667-15CE-31C9B957CFFE

treatment provided by

Plazi (2025-03-04 12:38:18, last updated 2025-03-04 12:48:06)

scientific name

Abana gigas ( Fowler, 1898 )
status

 

Abana gigas ( Fowler, 1898) View in CoL

( Figs. 10–11 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 )

Amblydisca gigas Fowler, 1898: 212 View in CoL [n. sp.]. Young (1965): 177 [lectotype designated]. Abana gigas, Distant (1908): 72 View in CoL [n. comb.]; Melichar (1926): 327 [redescription]; Schmidt (1928): 51 [listed]; Young (1968):

150 [listed, out of subgenus]; Ceotto & Mejdalani (2005): 482, 491 [phylogeny, illustrated: Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 , 9 View FIGURE 9 ]; McKamey (2007):

263 [catalogued]. Abana (Abana) gigas, Melichar (1926): 323 [key]; Metcalf (1965): 645 [catalogued].

Diagnosis. Body coloration ( Figs. 10A, B, D, E View FIGURE 10 , 11A, B View FIGURE 11 ) mostly castaneous brown, brochosome coverage may add a purple or blue tinge; head ( Fig. 10A–E View FIGURE 10 ) and pronotum ( Figs. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) completely dark, without markings; forewing coloration not sexually dimorphic. Crown anterior margin ( Fig. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 ) subtriangular to triangular; anterior portion ( Fig. 10B, E View FIGURE 10 ), in lateral view, straight, not inflated; disk with a distinct depression; M-shaped elevation bordering posterior margin inconspicuous. Connective ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ) arms almost converging anteriorly; base of arms with a V-shaped dorsal rim. Style ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ) with apodeme wide and long, 0.8 times as long as apophysis lenght; inner lobe rounded; apical portion rectangular, 1.5 times as long as wide; extending as far as connective apex. Aedeagal shaft ( Fig. 10I–K View FIGURE 10 ) with anterodorsal projections wide and short. Dorsal connective ( Fig. 10I–K View FIGURE 10 ) sclerotized; submedian acute process conspicuous.

Redescription. Total length: males (n = 3) 17.5–18.8 mm, females (n = 3) 19.0– 20.5 mm.

External structures. Crown ( Figs. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) pubescent; M-shaped elevation bordering posterior margin inconspicuous. Ocelli closer to adjacent anterior eye angle than to midline of crown. Hind legs with femoral setal formula 2:1:0 or 2:2:0. Other characters as in A. dives .

Coloration. Body ( Figs. 10A, B, D, E View FIGURE 10 , 11A, B View FIGURE 11 ) mostly castaneous, brochosome cover may add a purple and blue tinge. Head and thorax ( Figs. 10A, B, D, E View FIGURE 10 , 11A, B View FIGURE 11 ) almost completely to completely (lectotype, Fig. 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ) castaneous, with sometimes little and inconspicuous yellow areas on pleurites of thorax. Pronotum ( Figs. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 , 11A View FIGURE 11 ) completely brown. Forewings ( Figs. 10A, B, D, E View FIGURE 10 , 11A, B View FIGURE 11 ) castaneous (lectotype, Fig. 10A, B View FIGURE 10 ) to dark brown. Fore- and middle legs ( Figs. 10B, E View FIGURE 10 , 11B View FIGURE 11 ) with femora, tibiae, and tarsi yellow to brownish, with dark brown areas at basal and apical portions. Hind leg ( Figs. 10B, E View FIGURE 10 , 11B View FIGURE 11 ) castaneous to dark brown, with or without apical yellow area on femur. Abdomen ( Figs. 10B, E View FIGURE 10 , 11B View FIGURE 11 ) almost completely dark, with very narrow yellow areas along posterolateral margins of pleurites and on posterior margins of sternites.

Male terminalia. Pygofer ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) ventral margin, in lateral view, with a distinct median concavity, preapical region also with a small concavity. Base of connective arms ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ) with a V-shaped dorsal rim. Style ( Fig. 10H View FIGURE 10 ) with apodeme wide and long, 0.8 times as long as apophysis; apical portion rectangular, 1.5 times as long as wide; extending as far as connective apex. Aedeagal shaft ( Fig. 10I View FIGURE 10 ), in lateral view, with preapical dorsal spiniform process not extending to dorsal margin of lateral projections. Dorsal connective ( Fig. 10I–K View FIGURE 10 ) sclerotized; submedian acute process conspicuous. Other characters as in A. dives .

Female terminalia. Second valvula ( Fig. 11G View FIGURE 11 ), in lateral view, with 78 separated teeth on dorsal margin. Gonoplac ( Fig. 11I View FIGURE 11 ) apex triangular. Other characters as in A. dives .

Distribution. Costa Rica (Guanacaste [new record], Heredia, and Limón [new record] provinces), Ecuador [doubtful], Nicaragua [doubtful], and Panama (Bocas del Toro [new record], and Chiriquí provinces). Before this work, A. gigas was recorded from Costa Rica ( Fowler 1898; Melichar 1926; Metcalf 1965; Young 1968; Ceotto & Mejdalani 2005) and Panama ( Schmidt 1928; Metcalf 1965), mostly without specific locality data within these countries. Here, for the first time, we give specific locality records for the provinces of Guanacaste and Limón in Costa Rica and for the province of Bocas del Toro in Panama ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ). The known range of this species also includes records for Ecuador and Nicaragua, both of which are considered doubtful here. The first was given by Young (1968), but the author gave no details of the specimen from which he obtained this information, nor where it is deposited. In the Melichar collection at the MMBC, there is a dark colored female of A. dives from Ecuador: Chimbo, which bears an identification label “Transcriptio\ Abana \ gigas (Fowler) \ det. Young 1964” (see also the material listed under A. dives ; this specimen was originally identified as A. dives by Melichar and recorded as such in Melichar 1926; we agree with Melichar’s but not Young’s identification). Therefore, it is likely that the information on the occurrence of A. gigas in Ecuador by Young (1968) was based on this specimen, which was clearly misidentified. After the present study and the absence of any specimens of this species in Ecuador or in any other South American country, we are firmly convinced that the species is not distributed in South America. Finally, regarding the record in Nicaragua, it was reported by Freytag & Sharkey (2002), but in their paper, the authors cited Young (1968) as the source of the information, although this record does not exist in Young’s work. For this reason, the lack of traceability of the information and the lack of other evidence, we also consider this record from Nicaragua to be dubious. Given the known distribution of A. gigas , the probability of occurrence in Nicaragua may be high but no specimens from that country have been found.

Material examined. Type material: Lectotype, ♀ (based on photographs of habitus): COSTA RICA: “Costa Rica.\ Salle.”, “ B.C.A. Homopt. II.\ Amblydisca \ gigas,\ Fowl.” “ Amblydisca \ gigas. Fowler\ TYPE ”, “ LECTOTYPE \ Amblydisca \ gigas\ Fowler\ D. A. Young, 63”, “ TYPE ”, “ LECTO- \ TYPE ”, “ NHMUK 013588911 About NHMUK ” ( BMNH) . Other specimens: COSTA RICA: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ ( MMBC: L. Melichar collection) ; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, C. R. No 506, C.H. Ballou ( NCSU) . Guanacaste [new record]: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Carillo, Schild & Burgdorf ( USNM) . Heredia: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Heredia, Finca La Selva , 1976-vii-21–30, J.C. Solomon ( USNM) ; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, same data, except: 1995-i-12, S.M. Clark ( BYU) ; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, same data, except: near Pto. Viejo , 1973-iii-17–19, D.C. Rentz ( USNM) ; 1 ♂, same data, except: 10º25’N, 84º00’W, 179 ft, 2004-ii-25, C. R. Bartlett, J. Cryan, J. Urban, DNA voucher Entomologia DZRJ 6697 ( DZRJ) GoogleMaps . Limón [new record]: 1 ♀, Cairo , 1932-v-23, C.H. Ballou ( USNM) ; 3 ♂♂, Rio Dantas W of Guapiles, 1988-xii-26, A.S. Menke, DNA voucher Entomologia DZRJ ENT6581 ( USNM) ; 4 ♀♀, same data . 1 ♀, Parismina, M. Valerio (USNM) . PANAMA (based on photographs of habitus): Bocas del Toro : 1 ♂, Bocas del Toro, Corriente Grande , 9º17’30”N, 82º32’41”W, 100 m a.s.l., 1980-i-26, H.P. Stockwell ( STRI) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, same data, except: 1980-xi-14, H. Wolda ( STRI) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, same data, except: 1979-xii-16, H. Wolda ( STRI) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, same data, except: Buena Vista , 8º50’N, 82º15’W, 1977-i-09, R. Dressler ( STRI) GoogleMaps .

Remarks. Abana gigas is morphologically somewhat similar to specimens of A. tissa . These two species share a generally dark body coloration ( Figs. 10A–E View FIGURE 10 , 19A, B View FIGURE 19 ) and pubescent crown ( Figs. 10A, D View FIGURE 10 , 19A View FIGURE 19 , 20A View FIGURE 20 ) and differ from other Abana species in the coloration of the head, which is almost completely dark to completely dark. However, A. gigas can be easily distinguished from A. tissa by the following combination of characters: (1) body coloration ( Fig. 10A–E View FIGURE 10 ) mostly castaneous brown (dark brown in A. tissa , Fig. 19A, B View FIGURE 19 ), brochosome coverage ( Fig. 10D, E View FIGURE 10 ) may afford a purple tinge on head and thorax (only blue in some specimens of A. tissa , Fig. 20A, B View FIGURE 20 ), (2) fore- and middle legs ( Fig. 10B, E View FIGURE 10 ) with femora, tibiae, and tarsi yellow, with dark brown areas on the basal and apical portions (legs completely brown in A. tissa , Figs. 19B View FIGURE 19 , 20B View FIGURE 20 ), and (3) male pygofer ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) with a small preapical ventral concavity (preapical region convex in A. tissa , Fig. 19C View FIGURE 19 ). The yellow leg coloration and the general castaneous coloration are also present in the new species A. rufifrons sp. nov. ( Fig. 17A, B View FIGURE 17 ), yet, the complete castaneous coloration of the head of A. gigas is a conspicuous feature that makes it easily distinguishable from A. rufifrons sp. nov. (the latter having a rufous coloration on anterior part of the head, Fig. 17A, B View FIGURE 17 ), as well as the general coloration of the body ( Figs. 10A–E View FIGURE 10 , 17A, B View FIGURE 17 ), which is dark castaneous to dark brown in A. rufifrons sp. nov., with no bluish to purplish tinge. No COI sequence information was obtained for this species because DNA quality was too low (fragmented).

Ceotto, P. C. & Mejdalani, G. (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of the Abana group of genera (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae: Proconiini). Systematic Entomology, 30, 480-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2004.00280.x

Distant, W. L. (1908) VIII. - Rhynchotal notes - XLIV. (concluded from vol. i. p. 531). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8, 2 (7), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930808692453

Fowler, W. W. (1898) Order Rhynchota Suborder Hemiptera-Homoptera. Biologia Centrali-Americana, 2, 201-216.

Freytag, P. H. & Sharkey, M. J. (2002) A preliminary list of the leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) of Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 3, 235-283.

McKamey, S. H. (2007) Taxonomic catalogue of the leafhoppers (Membracoidea). Part 1. Cicadellinae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 78, 1-394.

Melichar, L. (1926) Monographie der Cicadellinen. III. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 23, 273-1394.

Metcalf, Z. P. (1965) Cicadelloidea. Part 1. Tettigellidae. General Catalogue of the Homoptera. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D. C., 730 pp.

Schmidt, E. (1928) Die Cicadellinen des Stettiner Museums. I. Stettiner entomologische Zeitung, 89, 31-62.

Young, D. A. (1965) Cicadelline types in the British Museum (Natural History) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 17, 163-199. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.14810

Young, D. A. (1968) Taxonomic study of the Cicadellinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), Part 1, Proconiini. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 261, 1-287. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.20869

Gallery Image

FIGURE 6. Abana confusa Sauceda-V & Takiya, sp. nov., male holotype (NCSU). A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, genital capsule, lateral view; D, subgenital plate, ventral view; E, connective and styles, dorsal view; F, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, lateral view; G, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, ventral view; H, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, posterior view. Scale bars A, B: 1.0 mm, C–H: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 9. Dorsal and lateral habitus and labels of type specimens of Abana dives (Walker, 1851) and synonyms. A–C, A. dives, male holotype (BMNH); D–F, A. drusilla Distant, 1908, female lectotype (BMNH). Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 10. Abana gigas (Fowler, 1898). A, male lectotype (BMNH), dorsal habitus; B, same male, lateral habitus; C, same male labels; D, male from Limon, Costa Rica (USNM), dorsal habitus; E, same male, lateral habitus; F, genital capsule, lateral view; G, subgenital plates, ventral view; H, connective and styles, dorsal view; I, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, lateral view; J, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, ventral view; K, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, posterior view. Scale bars A–E: 1.0 mm, F–K: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 11. Abana gigas (Fowler, 1898), female from Costa Rica (NCSU). A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, sternite VII, ventral view; D, pygofer, lateral view; E, first valvifer and first valvula, lateral view; F, detail of first valvula apex, lateral view; G, second valvifer and second valvula, lateral view; H, detail of second valvula, lateral view; I, gonoplac, lateral view. Scale bars A, B: 1.0 mm, C–I: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 17. Abana rufifrons Sauceda-V & Takiya, sp. nov., male holotype (USNM). A, dorsal habitus; B, lateral habitus; C, genital capsule, lateral view; D, subgenital plate, ventral view; E, connective and styles, dorsal view; F, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, lateral view; G, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, ventral view; H, aedeagus, anal tube and paraphyses, posterior view. Scale bars A, B: 1.0 mm, C–H: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 19. Abana tissa Distant, 1908, “brown morphotype”. A, male from Antioquia, Colombia (CEUA 124372), dorsal habitus; B, same male, lateral habitus; C, genital capsule, lateral view; D, subgenital plates, ventral view; E, connective and styles, dorsal view; F, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, lateral view; G, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, ventral view; H, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, posterior view. Scale bars A, B: 1.0 mm, C–H: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 20. Abana tissa Distant, 1908, “blue morphotype”.A, male fromAntioquia, Colombia (CEUA 124372), dorsal habitus; B, same male, lateral habitus; C, male from Valle del Cauca, Colombia (CEUA), dorsal habitus; D, same male, lateral habitus; E, genital capsule, lateral view; F, subgenital plates, ventral view; G, connective and styles, dorsal view; H, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, lateral view; I, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, ventral view; J, aedeagus, anal tube, and paraphyses, posterior view. Scale bars A–D: 1.0 mm, E–J: 0.5 mm.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 30. Distribution map of Abana species.

MMBC

Moravske Muzeum [Moravian Museum]

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

NCSU

North Carolina State University Insect Museum

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

BYU

Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum

STRI

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

Genus

Abana