Misgomyces Thaxt.

Santamaria, Sergi & Pedersen, Jan, 2021, Laboulbeniomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota) of Denmark, European Journal of Taxonomy 781, pp. 1-425 : 111

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.781.1583

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5835049

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D3878A-B73F-FF8A-6729-7C76DE92FBA9

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Misgomyces Thaxt.
status

 

Genus Misgomyces Thaxt. View in CoL View at ENA

MB#3217

Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 35: 443 ( Thaxter 1900). –

Type species: M. dyschirii Thaxt. View in CoL

Brief description

Monoecious. Receptacle multicelled, consisting of a lower uniseriate row of superposed cells and an upper region formed by irregularly arranged cells developed from subdivision of cell III. Antheridia immersed in primary appendage.

Remarks

The genus consists of two species: Misgomyces mastacis Balazuc (1975b) and M. dyschirii , only the latter in Europe. The genus Misgomyces has undergone many changes since its description, with many species having gone into and out of it. Thaxter (1931) added more species and transferred some species from Ecteinomyces and Hydrophilomyces . Tavares (1985) and Tavares & Majewski (1976) redefined the limits of the genus describing some new genera: Blasticomyces I.I.Tav. , Botryandromyces I.I.Tav. & T.Majewski , Dixomyces I.I.Tav. , Kyphomyces I.I.Tav. , Ormomyces I.I.Tav. and Siemaszkoa I.I.Tav. & T.Majewski. Misgomyces reicheiae (Santam.) Santam. and M. speluncae (Santam.) Santam. were added later ( Santamaria 1995a) but their generic position should be reconsidered, especially M. reicheiae which is dioecious (unpublished observations by SS).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF