Aechmea distichantha
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2021.1902010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D48783-FF95-8238-FF51-730B949AFB0C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-09-06 11:18:04, last updated 2023-11-06 14:59:38) |
scientific name |
Aechmea distichantha |
status |
|
Aechmea distichantha View in CoL as a keystone species
Among plants, until now, mainly trees have been labelled as keystone species ( Manning et al. 2006; Stagoll et al. 2012). Palms and figs have drawn the attention of researchers ( Lambert and Marshall 1991; Mills et al. 1993; Nason et al. 1998; Stevenson 2005) and emblematic palm species such as the threatened Madagascar Triangle Palm Neodypsis decaryi ( Ratsirarson and Silander 1996), the Neotropical dioecious Maurita flexuosa ( Brightsmith 2005; van der Hoek et al. 2019), Euterpe edulis in the Atlantic forest ( de Barros Leite et al. 2012) and Phoenix dactylifera (Date palm) in Mexico oases of Baja California peninsula, ( De Grenade 2013) have been identified as keystone plant species. Other arboreal species such as Araucaria angustifolia in the Atlantic forests ( Bogoni et al. 2020), the Parkia genus in Amazonian forests ( Peres 2000), Acacia trees in Negev desert ecosystems ( Munzbergova and Ward 2002) and Dipteryx micrantha (Fabaceae) in tropical lowland forests in Peru ( Brightsmith 2005) were also described playing that role in ecosystems. Finally, lianas, vascular epiphytes and climber plants have been reported as well as keystone species in forests ( Nadkarni 1994; Diaz-Martin et al. 2014). Even though many Bromeliaceae have been suggested as keystone species in forests ( Richardson 1999; Benzing 2000; Shackleton et al. 2018), to the best of our knowledge A. distichantha results in the first facultative epiphytic herbaceous plant (i.e. either terrestrial or epiphytic) reported as a keystone species.
This study showed the interactions of A. distichantha with many animal species from different taxonomic groups. On the assumption that the analyses of the linking structure of species are an appropriate criterion for determining the keystone species status ( Kotliar et al. 1999), this bromeliad species could be considered a keystone species, and thus being very important in regulating biodiversity ( Davic 2003). Identifying keystone species in threatened ecosystems ( Carnevale et al. 2007; Hansen et al. 2013) is an important task that ecologists should assume because of the documented importance of these species in conservation or biodiversity protection ( Mills et al. 1993), as well as by their important role by providing ecosystem services to humans ( Ladino et al. 2019) and by providing resources to many species of animals that interact with it and, as it happens with other species ( van der Hoek et al. 2019).
Summing up, this review provides new perspectives about the fauna associated with Aechmea distichantha , a keystone plant species, by listing the animal species and showing the importance of arthropods, by taxonomically describing this fauna assembly, by revealing the pattern of different groups in terms of their interactions with the plant as it is suggested for a correct review ( Sayer 2018), and finally by showing the need of improving the taxonomical identification in future studies, as this is an important gap in current knowledge.
Benzing DH. 2000. Bromeliaceae. Profile of an adaptive radiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bogoni JA, Muniz-Tagliari M, Peroni N, Peres CA. 2020. Testing the keystone plant resource role of a flagship subtropical tree species (Araucaria angustifolia) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecol Indic. 118: 106778. doi: 10.1016 / j. ecolind. 2020.106778.
Brightsmith DJ. 2005. Parrot nesting in southeastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson J Ornithol. 117: 296 - 305.
Carnevale NJ, Alzugaray C, Di Leo N. 2007. Estudio de la deforestacion en la Cuna Boscosa santafesina mediante teledeteccion espacial. Quebracho. 14: 47 - 56.
Davic RD. 2003. Linking keystone species and functional groups: a new operational definition of the keystone species concept. Conserv Ecol. 7.
de Barros Leite A, Brancalion PH, Guevara R, Galetti M. 2012. Differential seed germination of a keystone palm (Euterpe edulis) dispersed by avian frugivores. J Trop Ecol. 28 (6): 615 - 618. doi: 10.1017 / S 0266467412000594.
De Grenade R. 2013. Date palm as a keystone species in Baja California peninsula, Mexico oases. J Arid Environ. 94: 59 - 67. doi: 10.1016 / j. jaridenv. 2013.02.008.
Diaz-Martin Z, Swamy V, Terborgh J, Alvarez-Loayza P, Cornejo F. 2014. Identifying keystone plant resources in an Amazonian forest using a long-term fruit-fall record. J Trop Ecol. 30 (4): 291 - 301. doi: 10.1017 / S 0266467414000248.
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SAA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, et al. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21 st-century forest cover change. Science. 342 (6160): 850 - 853. doi: 10.1126 / science. 1244693.
Kotliar NB, Baker BW, Whicker AD, Plumb G. 1999. A critical review of assumptions about the prairie dog as a keystone species. Environ Manage. 24 (2): 177 - 192. doi: 10.1007 / s 002679900225.
Ladino G, Ospina-Bautista F, Estevez Varon J, Jerabkova L, Kratina P. 2019. Ecosystem services provided by bromeliad plants: a systematic review. Ecol Evol. 9 (12): 7360 - 7372. doi: 10.1002 / ece 3.5296.
Lambert FR, Marshall AG. 1991. Keystone characteristics of bird-dispersed Ficus in a Malaysian lowland rain forest. J Ecol. 79 (3): 793 - 809. doi: 10.2307 / 2260668.
Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. 2006. Scattered trees are keystone structures - implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 32 (3): 311 - 321. doi: 10.1016 / j. biocon. 2006.04.023.
Mills L, Soule M, Doak D. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience. 43: 219 - 224.
Munzbergova Z, Ward D. 2002. Acacia trees as keystone species in Negev desert ecosystems. J Veg Sci. 13: 227 - 236.
Nadkarni NM. 1994. Diversity of species and interactions in the upper tree canopy of forest ecosystems. Am Zool. 34: 70 - 78.
Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL. 1998. The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature. 391: 685 - 687.
Peres CA. 2000. Identifying keystone plant resources in tropical forests: the case of gums from Parkia pods. J Trop Ecol. 16: 287 - 317.
Ratsirarson J, Silander JJA. 1996. Reproductive biology of the threatened Madagascar triangle palm: neodypsis decaryi Jumelle. Biotropica. 28: 737 - 745.
Richardson BA. 1999. The bromeliad microcosm and the assessment of faunal diversity in a Neotropical forest 1. Biotropica. 31: 321 - 336.
Sayer EJ. 2018. The anatomy of an excellent review paper. Funct Ecol. 32: 2278 - 2281.
Shackleton CM, Ticktin T, Cunningham AB. 2018. Nontimber forest products as ecological and biocultural keystone species. Ecol Soc. 23: 4.
Stagoll K, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD. 2012. Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conserv Lett. 5: 115 - 122.
Stevenson P. 2005. Potential keystone plant species for the frugivore community at Tinigua Park, Colombia. In: Dew JL, Boubli JP, editors. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 37 - 57.
van der Hoek Y, Alvarez Solas S, Penuela MC. 2019. The palm Mauritia flexuosa, a keystone plant resource on multiple fronts. Biodivers Conserv. 28: 539 - 551.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |