Jucancistrocerus, Bluthgen, 1938

Li, Ting-Jing, Bai, Yue & Chen, Bin, 2022, A revision of the genus Jucancistrocerus Blüthgen, 1938 from China, with review of three related genera (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae), Zootaxa 5105 (3), pp. 401-420 : 402-403

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5105.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:75AC29AF-CA8F-48B3-8458-E305678D0540

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6343473

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D5340A-CC4B-FA39-83B6-FB9ECBACFF04

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Jucancistrocerus
status

 

Key to the species of Jucancistrocerus View in CoL View at ENA and the related genera from China

1. Pretegular keel absent on the pronotum.................................................................... 2

- Pretegular keel present and developed on the pronotum....................................................... 8

2. Tegula inconspicuously, finely and superficially punctate, usually with only two larger translucent spots ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 65–72 )............................................... Eustenancistrocerus (Parastenancistrocerus) amadanensis ( de Saussure, 1855) View in CoL

- Tegula with dense, strong, sieve-like translucent punctures ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 10–16 , 51 View FIGURES 47–55 , 60)....................................... 3

3. T1 short and distinctly wider than long; transverse edge of T1 lying on the level of horizontal area approximately in the middle of this tergum ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56–64 )................. Eustenancistrocerus (Eustenancistrocerus) askhabadensis ( Radoszkowski, 1886) View in CoL

- T1 elongate and slightly wider than long, or if distinctly wider than long, dorsal surface of propodeum posteriorly with one supercarina extending to lateral side ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–9 , 14); transverse edge of T1 lower than the horizontal surface and closer to the base of this tergum ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1–9 , 15, 22 View FIGURES 17–25 , 37, 52 View FIGURES 47–55 )............................................... Jucancistrocerus Blüthgen View in CoL 4

4. Clypeus shallowly emarginated at apex ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–9 , 11); T1 much wider than long and somewhat narrower than (more than 0.8×) T2 ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1–9 , 15)....................................................................................... 5

- Clypeus more deeply emarginated at apex, and tooth-like laterally ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 34–35, 45–46, 49–50 View FIGURES 47–55 ); T1 elongate, a little wider than long and distinctly narrower than (less than 0.8×) T2 ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 17–25 , 37, 52 View FIGURES 47–55 ).................................. 6

5. Body more coarsely punctate ( Figs 1–4, 8–9 View FIGURES 1–9 ); apical margin of clypeus emarginated and incised ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–9 ); mesoscutum without or with one smaller subapical spot ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–9 )..................... J. (Eremodynerus) atrofasciatus ( Morawitz, 1885) View in CoL

- Body less sparsely punctate ( Figs 10–12, 15–16 View FIGURES 10–16 ); apical margin of clypeus slightly emarginated; mesoscutum medially with one big subapical spot ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–16 ).............................................. J. (E.) chotanensis ( Blüthgen, 1942) View in CoL

6. Clypeus coarsely punctate in both sexes, and apex relatively narrower (in female apical width: depth of emargination= 2.89, in male apical width: depth of emargination=2.57) ( Figs 49–50 View FIGURES 47–55 ).......... J. (Jucancistrocerus) tachkensis ( Dalla Torre, 1889) View in CoL

- Clypeus less sparsely punctate, and apex wider (in female apical width: depth of emargination=3.32–3.96, in male apical width: depth of emargination=1.99–2.25) ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 30–31, 34–35, 45–46)........................................... 7

7. Both female and male clypeus widely and shallowly emarginated at apex ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 32–40 , 45–46); male A13 hooked backward not reaching the base of A11 ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 32–40 ); volsella ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 32–40 ) apically narrower and sharper..... J. (J.) angustifrons ( Kostylev, 1940) View in CoL

- Both female and male clypeus more narrowly and deeply emarginated at apex ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 30–31); male A13 hooked backward extending to the base of A11 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 17–25 ); volsella ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 17–25 ) apically wider and blunter...... J. (J.) alashanicus Kurzenko, 1977 View in CoL

8. Transverse edge of T1 lying below the level of horizontal surface of this tergum ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 81–89 ); T3 much coarser in the distal portion than at the base of T2 ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 81–89 ); clypeus truncate and narrow at apex (83–84)...................................................................................................... Tachyancistrocerus schmidti (Kokujev, 1912) View in CoL

- Transverse edge of T1 lying at the level of the horizontal surface ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 73–80 ); punctures on T3 not coarser than those of T2 ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 73–80 ); clypeus deeply and widely emarginted at apex ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 73–80 )............................................................................................. Stenancistrocerus (Paratropancistrocerus) transcaspicus (Kostylev, 1934) View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Eumenidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF