Archostemata, Kolbe, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.488.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:365BADCC-23BA-4494-B45C-73B1C42706E4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D56657-FFAE-FFE7-FDAE-FC02F975DD0E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Archostemata |
status |
|
Suborder Archostemata
REMARKS. Position of the fossil genus Notocupes and related genera within families of suborder Archostemata is still uncertain. There are two points of view regarding the taxonomic status of the family Ommatidae : treating it as a subfamily of Cupedidae ( Kirejtshuk et al., 2016; Jarzembowski et al., 2016, 2017, 2019; Kirejtshuk, 2020, 2021) and as a separate family ( Lawrence, 1999; Tan et al., 2006, 2012; Tihelka et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020; Strelnikova & Yan, 2021, 2023). There is also a suggestion to placed Notocupes and related genera into a separate family Notocupedidae ( Li et al., 2023a, b). Thus, Notocupes should be used without specifying the family ( Li et al., 2023a) until clear diagnoses for the families discussed that can be applied to fossil material will be formulated.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.