Disphaerobius loricatus ( Sseliwanoff, 1881 ) Sseliwanoff, 1881

Farzalieva, Gyulli Sh., Nefediev, Pavel S. & Tuf, Ivan H., 2017, Revision of Disphaerobius Attems, 1926 (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae: Pterygoterginae), a centipede genus with remarkable sexual dimorphism, Zootaxa 4258 (2), pp. 121-137 : 131-134

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4258.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:949BAF3D-D8DF-4BC5-98CB-1F2D946EF802

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6022947

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D7CE78-FFEF-FFE3-32F9-FCC7FCF8FC13

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Disphaerobius loricatus ( Sseliwanoff, 1881 )
status

comb. nov.

Disphaerobius loricatus ( Sseliwanoff, 1881) comb. nov.

Figs 22–26 View FIGURES 21 – 24 View FIGURES 25 – 29

Lithobius loricatus View in CoL — Sseliwanoff, 1881: 16 (♂).

Lithobius magnificus View in CoL — Trotzina, 1895: 108, Taf. I: figs 1–4 (♂) syn. nov. Disphaerobius magnificus — Attems 1927: 243 (new comb.).

Lithobius loricatus View in CoL — Zalesskaja 1978: 119 (♂); Farzalieva & Zalesskaja 2003: 265, 266: figs 1–13 (♂♂, ♀♀).

Material examined: Type material: Holotype male ( ZIL, No. 94), labelled in Latin “ Lithobius loricatus Ssel. ♂, inter Semipalatinsk et Ajagus , leg. A. Schrenk ” = Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan Region, between Semey and Ayagoz, no date, leg. A. Schrenk . Allotype: 1 female ( ZMUM), Russia, Orenburg Area, Sol-Iletsk District, Chybynda , base of limestone denudation, slope, VI.2000, leg. S.L. Esyunin & G.Sh . Farzalieva. 2 males, 1 female ( PSU, No. 116), same locality, limestone plateau, saline land with Astragalus , VI.2000, leg. S.L. Esyunin & G.Sh. Farzalieva .

Other material examined: Russia: Orenburg Area: 1 male , 2 females ( ZMUM), Sol-Iletsk District, Chybynda , base of limestone denudation, slope, limestone plateau, salina with Astragalus growth, VI.2000, leg. S.L. Esyunin & G.Sh . Farzalieva; 1 male, 1 female (PSU, No. 179), 1 male ( PSU, No. 147), same locality, limestone slope, V–VI.2003, leg. T.K. Tuneva ; 1 male, 3 females ( ZMUM), same locality, V.2015, leg. S.L. Esyunin ; 1 male, 1 female ( PSU, No. 117), near Aituar Village, stony scree under rock, V.1996, leg. T.I. Gridina & same locality, scree on bank of Ural River , V.2015, leg. S. Dedyukhin; 1 male, 2 females ( PSU, No. 450), near Boevaya Gora Village , steppe, IV.2009, leg. V.O. Kozminykh & same locality, stony steppe , V.2015, leg. S.L. Esyunin; 1 female (PSU, No. 191), Donguz steppe, under stones, IV.2000, leg. S.L. Esyunin & G.Sh. Farzalieva; 9 males, 6 females ( PSU, No. 316), 3 km NW Pervomaiskii Village , steppe, Stipa , VI.2007 & same locality, Donguz steppe , X.2007 – V.2008, V.2009, all leg. V.O. Kozminykh; 1 male, 2 females ( PSU, No. 481), Svetlinskii District, near Dombarovkii Village , steppe, V.2015, leg. S.L. Esyunin ; 6 males, 5 females ( PSU, No. 448), Sol-Iletsk District, 8 km SW Troitsk Village, Tasbulak dried-up river-bed, cretaceous sediments, 8–22.VI.2008, leg. V.O. Kozminykh & V.A. Nemkov . Kazakhstan: 1 female ( PSU, No. 483), Aktobe Region, Mugalzhar District, 30 km E of Emba Village, Mugodzhar Hills , N 48˚46′, E 58˚32′, 550 m a.s.l., no date, leg. A.V. Ivanov .

Diagnosis. In D. loricatus males, T 14 is the broadest, but without two lobes ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 21 – 24 & 26 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). In females, T 12 is of similar length and width, concave at the rear edge, without formed lobes ( Farzalieva & Zalesskaja 2003: Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ). The main differences between D. svenhedini and D. loricatus are summarized in Table 3.

Description. See a detailed redescription by Farzalieva & Zalesskaja (2003).

Remarks. The head and tergites are strongly punctate; the forcipules broadened, significantly extended beyond the cephalic plate ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ), the trochanteroprefemur is slightly concave on the inner surface, with an almost straight, ventral, chitinous rib ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21 – 24 ). All males have T 14 and Tim broadened and serrate, especially strongly broadened is T 14, their surface roughly rugose ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 21 – 24 & 26 View FIGURES 25 – 29 ). In addition, some specimens show serrate edges of T 13 and slightly serrate posterolateral edges of T 12. In all males, 15F are thickened, with two distinct sulci, i.e. a poorly expressed dorsolateral sulcus and a deep dorsal sulcus, the latter forming apically a round tubercle supporting a cluster of thick and short setae; some specimens in addition with 1 or 2 poorly expressed dorsal sulci on 15P; 15Ti with a barely visible dorsolateral sulcus. In most males, very fine and dense setae cover rear halves of SS 14–15, as well as 14C, 13P, F and Ti ventrally. Tarsi 1–13 with two ventral tarsal pectens.

Disphaerobius svenhedini (Verhoeff, 1934) Disphaerobius loricatus ( Sseliwanoff, 1881) comb. comb. nov. nov.

Distribution ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ): Steppe zone from the Sol-Iletsk District, Orenburg Area, Russia in the west to the East Kazakhstan Region of Kazakhstan ( Sseliwanoff 1881) in the east.

ZIL

Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute

ZMUM

Zoological Museum, University of Amoy

PSU

Portland State University, Vertebrate Biology Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Chilopoda

Order

Lithobiomorpha

Family

Lithobiidae

Genus

Disphaerobius

Loc

Disphaerobius loricatus ( Sseliwanoff, 1881 )

Farzalieva, Gyulli Sh., Nefediev, Pavel S. & Tuf, Ivan H. 2017
2017
Loc

Lithobius loricatus

Farzalieva 2003: 265
Zalesskaja 1978: 119
1978
Loc

Lithobius magnificus

Attems 1927: 243
Trotzina 1895: 108
1895
Loc

Lithobius loricatus

Sseliwanoff 1881: 16
1881
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF