Hydroglyphus hormuzensis Hájek & Brancucci, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0021 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABBA2B4F-8B60-41E2-B80B-45861F974B23 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4548994 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD87A0-FFD6-FFD4-FF18-FE2DDBDBFC40 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hydroglyphus hormuzensis Hájek & Brancucci, 2011 |
status |
|
Hydroglyphus hormuzensis Hájek & Brancucci, 2011 View in CoL
Published records. HÁJEK & BRANCUCCI (2011).
Material examined. Loc. 3: 1 ♁ 1 ♀ (1 ♀ designated as paratype, deposited in the IBEB, used for DNA extraction with voucher No. IBE- -RA99); Loc. 8: 1 ♀.
Notes. We found this species in a muddy residual pool with silt substratum, together with Ochthebius bernard sp. nov. and Hydraena naja sp. nov. ( Fig. 4 View Figs 2–7 ; see below) and in a stream (wadi) (localities numbers 4 and 8 respectively; Tables 1 View Table 1 , 3 View Table 3 and Figs 5, 6 View Figs 2–7 , 8 View Figs 8–13 ). As noted in the description ( HÁJEK & BRANCUCCI 2011), the male genitalia has two-segmented parameres, in contrast to the typical three-segmented parameres of the species of Hydroglyphus ( BISTRÖM 1986) . The inclusion of H. hormuzensis in the genus Hydroglyphus has to be revised, together with that of other species with two-segmented parameres (unpublished molecular results).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |