Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915

Schileyko, Arkady A., Vahtera, Varpu & Edgecombe, Gregory D., 2020, An overview of the extant genera and subgenera of the order Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda): a new identification key and updated diagnoses, Zootaxa 4825 (1), pp. 1-64 : 14-15

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4825.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F230F199-1C94-4E2E-9CE4-5F56212C015F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4455391

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE092D-FFFF-D704-FF13-F8E52C12DDEA

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915
status

 

(!) Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915

Figs 22–25 View FIGURES 20–25

Synonyms. Kartops Archey, 1923 .

Type species. Tidops simus Chamberlin,1915 View in CoL (by monotypy).

Diagnosis. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite with two short, blunt projections ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–25 ); forcipular tarsungula short, barely overlapping each other when adducted. LBS 7 without spiracles. Ultimate leg with tarsus 2 divided into 6–23 variably-distinct secondary articles, without claw-shaped pretarsus.

Number of species: 4.

Remarks. Treated as a genus in Edgecombe & Bonato (2011: 406), Chagas-Jr (2011: 63), Vahtera et al. (2013: 579) and Bonato et al. (2016). As a result of a molecular analysis Vahtera et al. (2013: 589) suggested this genus to be a subgenus of Newportia . Schileyko (2002) was the first to doubt the validity of the enigmatic genus Kartops Archey, 1923 when he wrote that (p. 5): “The same investigation allows also to regard the genus Kartops … to be a junior synonym of Tidops “. Edgecombe & Bonato (2011: 406) agreed with that, noting that Tidops possibly includes Kartops . The most recent morphological account on Tidops is that by Chagas-Jr (2011: 71), who synonymized Kartops with Tidops .

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF