Taphura crispula Sanborn, 2017a
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4880.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33BE91BC-DC0F-4CBB-85AB-CA7BF1891C0C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4573809 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE878C-FFD2-FFFA-FF3B-742AD42EFA1D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Taphura crispula Sanborn, 2017a |
status |
|
Taphura crispula Sanborn, 2017a View in CoL
Taphura crispula Sanborn 2017a: 462 View in CoL View Cited Treatment . (Estación Cientifica Yasuni, 00º 40’28”S, 76º 38’50”W, Napo Province, Ecuador)
REMARKS.—The male genitalia, particularly the shape of the claspers, quickly separate male specimens Taphura from one another as each species have highly unique genitalia. The transverse piceous mark on the anterior side of the abdominal tergites in T. crispula is absent in T. hastifera and T. sauliensis ( Sanborn 2017a) .
DISTRIBUTION.—The species has been reported only from Napo province, Ecuador ( Sanborn 2017a).
MATERIAL EXAMINED.— Holotype. “ ECUADOR: Napo Province / Estación Cientifica Yasuni / 00º 40’28”S, 76º 38’50”W / IX–5–10–1999, UV light / Coll. E.G. Riley, 215 m. ” one male ( TAMU). GoogleMaps
UV |
Departamento de Biologia de la Universidad del Valle |
TAMU |
Texas A&M University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Taphura crispula Sanborn, 2017a
Sanborn, Allen F. 2020 |