Leptalpheus lirai Vera Caripe, Pereda & Anker, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5466.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B43F7FDA-5E3B-4153-A991-E2A96E582A3B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DF87CE-FF8F-FF9B-8CC4-FDA24D4BEE62 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Leptalpheus lirai Vera Caripe, Pereda & Anker, 2021 |
status |
|
Leptalpheus lirai Vera Caripe, Pereda & Anker, 2021
( Figs. 27–29 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29 )
Leptalpheus lirai Vera Caripe, Pereda & Anker, 2021: 178 View Cited Treatment , figs. 1–3.
Fenneralpheus View in CoL nov. sp. E.— Felder et al., 2003: table 3.
“ Fenneralpheus ” sp.— Robles, 2005: chapter 3, table 1.
Material examined. USA: 1 ovigerous female (cl 11.3 mm), ULLZ 18233 View Materials [ USNM 1706499 About USNM ], Florida, Ft. Pierce, from inlet, coll. R. B. Manning, 08.08.1989; 1 male (cl 7.8 mm) , ULLZ 18234 View Materials [ USNM 1706500 About USNM ], same locality as previous, coll. D.L. Felder, 01.07.1987 .
Description. See Vera Caripe et al. (2021).
Color in life. Not recorded.
Type locality. Bahía Petare , Gulf of Santa Fe, Sucre, Venezuela .
Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Venezuela ( Vera Caripe et al. 2021) and the Atlantic coast of Florida, USA ( Felder et al. 2003; present study).
Ecology. Burrow cohabitant of a yet unknown host ( Vera Caripe et al. 2021; present study).
Remarks. The material of L. lirai listed above was first reported as an unspecified species of Fenneralpheus from Florida without illustrations or morphological notes ( Felder et al. 2003). This species was later described as a member of Leptalpheus , although the authors mentioned some morphological similarities with the genus Fenneralpheus , namely the robustness and proportions of the walking legs ( Vera Caripe et al. 2021).
The specimens of L. lirai from Florida reported above largely morphologically correspond to the type description, which was based on Venezuelan specimens (compare Figs. 27–29 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29 to Vera Caripe et al. 2021: figs. 2, 3). However, they differ in three notable characters: (1) the specimens from Florida have a more prominent median groove on the frontal margin (compare Fig. 27b View FIGURE 27 vs. Vera Caripe et al. 2021: fig. 2A); (2) the distolateral tooth of the scaphocerite is well-developed and subacute as opposed to reduced to a blunt lobe (compare Fig. 27b, c View FIGURE 27 vs. Vera Caripe et al. 2021: fig. 2A, B); and (3) the carpus of the second pereopod is composed of four rather than five articles (compare Fig. 29b View FIGURE 29 vs. Vera Caripe et al. 2021: fig. 2H).
Our genetic analysis recovered a clade containing L. lirai and F. orabovis with moderate confidence (Bs = 70), but it is worth noting that only a single 16S sequence was amplified from specimens of L. lirai . Interestingly, L. lirai has well developed adhesive disks on the major chela and F. orabovis has feebly developed, rudimentary adhesive disks, whereas its congener F. chacei lacks these structures.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leptalpheus lirai Vera Caripe, Pereda & Anker, 2021
Scioli, Justin A., Robles, Rafael & Felder, Darryl L. 2024 |