Ochrotrichia machadoi Desidério, Moreno, Carvalho & Hamada, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2023-0069 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DFBA59-8A3C-FFC4-807D-F8973B9AF902 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ochrotrichia machadoi Desidério, Moreno, Carvalho & Hamada |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ochrotrichia machadoi Desidério, Moreno, Carvalho & Hamada , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:538B87A6-5D74-4D14-989F-8B17869C00BC ( Figs 4A–E View Figure 4 & 5A–I View Figure 5 )
Differential diagnosis. Ochrotrichia machadoi sp. nov. belongs to the O. xena group by having elongated, simple, tergum X. It is most similar to O. belodes Moreno, Desidério, Pes and Hamada, 2021 by the shape of the inferior appendage in lateral view, oblong, long (3.5X as long as wide) and apex rounded with inner surfaces bearing numerous slender, dark, peg-like setae grouped subapically. However, in O. belodes the tergum X has a pair of sclerotized claw-like basodorsal process, which is absent in O. machadoi sp. nov. Although both species present the tergum X subsagittate to sagittate in dorsal view, the apex is pointed directed on left side, whereas it is pointed directed posterad in O. belodes . Furthermore, O. machadoi sp. nov. can be recognized by having only two clusters of spines on the inner surfaces of the inferior appendages, while O. belodes has three clusters.
Description. Adult male. Total body length 2.16 mm (n = 1) ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ); forewing length 1.85 mm (n = 1). General color yellowish brown (in alcohol) ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ). Head with three ocelli; dorsally with two pairs of setal warts; ocellar pair closely appressed on midline, each subtriangular; posterolateral pair large, ellipsoid ( Fig.4C View Figure 4 ). Metascutellum subpentagonal ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ). Forewing with forks I, II, III present; discoidal cell absent; R 3 fused with basal 3/4 of R 4+5; M 1+2 partially fused with subapical portion of R 4+5; M 1 partially fused with basal 1/3 of R 5, ending on wing margin almost at level of end of R 5; M 2, completely independent of R 4+5, ending on wing margin almost at level of end of R 4; fork of M 1+2 and M 3+4 branching from each other near origin of independent R 3; r and r-m crossveins present ( Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ). Hind wings with forks II and V C with row of short spines on proximal region; R 2+3 originating midway between origins of R 1 and R 4+5; base of M 1+2 not fused to R, branching from M 3+4 near middle of wing; and Cu 1 subdivided apically into 2 branches ( Fig.4E View Figure 4 ). Tibial spur formula 0, 3, 4. Abdominal sternum VII with pointed mesoventral process ( Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ).
Male genitalia. Segment IX,in lateral view, with upper anterolateral margin slightly concave, mesoventrally produced; upper posterolateral margin slightly produced posterad ( Fig. 5A, D View Figure 5 ); in dorsal view, with U-shaped cleft posteriorly ( Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ); in ventral view, subquadrangular ( Fig. 5H, I View Figure 5 ). Tergum X, in lateral view, subtriangular, 2/3 as long as inferior appendages, bearing one subapical acute process on the left side directed posteroventrad, apically with shallow cleft and subacute process directed lateroventrad ( Fig. 5A–B, D View Figure 5 ); in dorsal view, narrow, not divided, subsagittate, with slightly sclerotized base bearing ventral, stick-shaped apodeme at midlength; without basodorsal process or projection; apex strongly sclerotized, pointed directed on left side ( Fig.5F View Figure 5 ). Inferior appendage, in lateral view, oblong; 3.5X as long as wide, apically rounded ( Fig. 5A, D View Figure 5 ); in dorsal view, surpassing tergum X, with inner surfaces bearing numerous slender, dark, peg-like setae grouped subapically ( Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ); in ventral view, with row of 5–9 medium-sized, thick spines at 1/3 basal on inner margin ( Fig. 5H, I View Figure 5 ). Phallus simple, tubular, 3.2x longer than inferior appendages, thread-like ( Fig. 5E, G View Figure 5 ). Holotype. Male. BRAZIL: Tocantins: Palmas , Parque Estadual do Lajeado , Igarapé da Onça (#01-TO), 10°06′44.50″S, 48°15′31.10″W, 596 m, 28.xii.2017, J. O. Silva, G. Amora legs., Malaise trap ( INPA ). Paratypes: Same data as for holotype, 1 male ( MNRJ), 1 male ( DZRJ); same collection data as for preceding, except 30.i.2018, 1 male ( INPA ), 1 male ( UFBA). Etymology. This new species is named in memory of the late Prof. Dr.Angelo Barbosa Monteiro Machado (1934-2020) (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil) in recognition of his contributions to the study of the Neotropical aquatic insects, especially dragonflies (Odonata) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. BRAZIL: Cerrado biome (Tocantins state) ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
MNRJ |
Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |