Ocypus (Pseudocypus) inexspectatus Eppelsheim, 1887

Smetana, Aleš, 2009, Contributions to the knowledge of the “ Staphylinus-complex ” (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylinini) of China. Part 21. The genus Ocypus Leach, 1819, subgenus Pseudocypus Mulsant & Rey, 1876. Section 4, Zootaxa 2286, pp. 1-30 : 11-13

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.191273

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6217660

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DFE029-FFA0-F85C-FF19-4AC54BA8FCE4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ocypus (Pseudocypus) inexspectatus Eppelsheim, 1887
status

 

Ocypus (Pseudocypus) inexspectatus Eppelsheim, 1887 View in CoL

( Figs. 22–28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 )

inexspectatus Eppelsheim, 1887 View in CoL , 422 ( Ocypus View in CoL ).

Bernhauer & Schubert, 1914, 387 ( Staphylinus View in CoL ; Gruppe Ocypus View in CoL ; spelled as inexpectatus); Scheerpeltz, 1933, 1395 ( Staphylinus View in CoL ; spelled as inexpectatus); Müller, 1943, 105 ( Staphylinus View in CoL ; spelled as inexpectatus); Coiffait, 1974, 505 ( Pseudocypus ; spelled as inexpectatus); Smetana & Davies, 2000, 44 ( Ocypus View in CoL ; subg. Pseudocypus ); Herman, 2001, 3383 ( Ocypus View in CoL ); Smetana, 2004, 677 ( Ocypus View in CoL ; subg. Pseudocypus ).

Type material. Eppelsheim (1887, 422) described the species from one female specimen taken in the Russian Far East near Vladivostok (“Ein von Herrn Graeser bei Wladiwostok gesammeltes Ψ verdanke ich der Güte des Herrn Koltze”). The holotype in the Eppelsheim collection in the Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, is labeled as follows: “Ψ” / “ inexspectatus mihi Wladiwostok, Amur leg. Graeser” / ” inexspectatus Epp. Deutsch. Ent. Zeit. 1887 p. 422” / ”inexpectatus Epp. Dedt. J. Müller” / “ TYPUS ”.

The specimen is in bad condition, six outer segments of left antenna are missing, small lateral portion of right elytron is missing, the abdomen is separated from the rest of the body, with tergites separated (first two showing Dermestes damage) separately and most of the sternites missing. The specimen was arranged on a mounting plate, the somewhat damaged female genital segment was glued to the plate with the beetle.

Additional material studied: RUSSIA: Primorskiy Kray: ” USSR or., Ussuri, Kamenjuška, 27.7.1989, Stan Bečvář lgt.” (1) ( ASC); ”Sibiria or., 6– 10.7.1989, Ussuri reg., Novovarvarovka, R. Dunda leg.” (1) (MDC); ”Sib. or. m., 5/[19]92, Primorje, 300 m, Kozarovka fl., Voříšek legit” (1) (MDC); ” USSR, Sibiria or., Jasnoje env., 12.7. 1989, 400 m, Stan Jakl legit” (2) ( ASC, MDC); ”SIBIRIA or., 12.7.1989, Yasnoe, R. Dunda leg.” (1) (MDC); ” Russia or., Primorskij Kraj, Lazovskij Distr., river Elomovsky, 12.VII.1995, leg. Y. Sundukov” (1) (APC); ” RUSSIA, South Primorye, Lazovskij nature reserve, Sukhoj stream, 17– 19.05.2002, Yu. Sundukov, L. Sundukova” (2) ( ASC, AVC); ”S Primorye, Lazovskij nat[ure]. res[erve]., kordon Prosyolochnij (Ta Chingouza), 1–3.07.2007, Shavrin A. Leg.” (1) (AVC); ” Russia or., Primorskij Kraj, Lazovskij distr., spring valley Kovarinovo, 5 km NE Lazo, 1–5.VI.1995, leg. J. Sundukov” (1) (APC); ” Russia or., Primorskij Kraj, Lazovskij distr., spring valley Gerasimova, 3 km N Lazo, 06.V.1995, leg. J. Sundukov” (1) (APC); ” Russia or., Primorskij Kraj, Lazovskij nat[ure]. Park [reserve], env. lodge Petrova, 9 km SE vill. Kievka, 3.–8.VI.1994, leg. J. Sundukov” (1) (APC); ” Russia or.: Primorie, Sikhote-Alinsky Res., Kordon Kabany, taiga, 135°52’40”E 45°08’16”N, 650–900 m, 30.VI–4.VII.1999, leg. J. Sundukov” (4) ( ASC, MSC); ” Russland: Primorie, (S7/11), Schutzgebiet Sichote-Alin, Jasnaja-Mündung, 26.VI.– 4.VII.1998, leg. J. Sundukov” (2) ( ASC, MSC); ” Russia or., Primorskij Kraj, Sikhote Alin Mt. Range, Partisanskij Chr[ebet: Ridge]., Mt. Lysaja, 1500–1560 m, 6.VI.1994, leg. J. Sundukov” (1) (APC); ” Russia or.: Primorie, Sikhote-Alin Mts., Gorelaja Sopka Mt., 134°06’08”E 43°30’30”N, 1300–1499 m, 17.– 20.VI.1999, Sundukov” (1) (MSC); ” Russia or.: Primorie Ussurijsky Res., Komarovo-Zapovednoe, 132°20’40”E 43°38’48”N, 21–27.V.1999, leg. J. Sundukov” (2) (MSC); ” RUSSIA: Primorie, 20 km N Artyom town, 100–350 m, Kamenushka river, VI–VII.1997, leg. A. Plutenko” (1) (MSC); ” Russia, Primorie, S Artyom town env., 100–300 m, Ozenyi kluytch riv., 20.IV.–30.V.1976, leg. A. Plutenko” (7) ( ASC, MSC); ” RUSSIA: Primorie, Artyom env., Ozenyi kljutsch river, 100–300 m, VIII.1996, leg. A. Plutenko” (1) (MSC); ” RUSSIA: Far East, Ussuri Area, Chanka Lake, 20–30.VI.2001 ” (2) ( ASC, MSC); ” RUSSIA: Primorie reg., Nadezhenskyi distr., Ananjevka riv., 15–30.VII.2002, A. Plutenko” (4) ( ASC, MSC); ” RUSSIA, Primorsky Kray, 5 km S of Anisimovka vil[lage]., N43°07’ E132°48’, 21–30.vi.2007, 500– 1000 m, V. Grebennikov” (4) ( ASC); ” USSR, Prim[orskiy]. Kra[y].: Zapov[ednik: Nature Reseve]. Kedrovaya pad’, Kedrovaya river valley, 18.VII.1958, Vasilev” (2) ( ASC); ”Asia or., SSSR, Zapovednik kedrovaja pad’, 2.V. [19]58, Vasilev” (1) ( CNC); ”Seitengraben des Perwaja Rjetschka Tales, nördl. Wladiwostok / H. Frieb leg., 1918–1920 ” (1) ( NMW).

Diagnosis. Medium-sized species, sharing many character states with O. aenescens , but different by the differently shaped aedoeagus, and by several external characters, as given in the description.

Description. In all character states similar to O. aenescens , but different as follows: average size smaller, body form more slender; surface of head and pronotum with more coppery lustre; legs slightly paler, mostly piceous with all tarsi more or less paler; head of more rounded shape with entirely rounded posterior angles; punctation of head similar to that of O. aenescens , but on average somewhat denser; pronotum not voluminous, punctation similar to that of O. aenescens , but less dense and somewhat coarser, no more than slightly finer and denser than that of disc of head; impunctate midline wider and therefore more apparent.

Male. Area behind anterior angles of pronotum densely punctate. Sternite 7 with medioapical emargination similar to that of O. aenescens , but less deep and more obtuse. Genital segment with sternite 9 wider, with apex finely notched ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ). Tergite 10 wider than that of O. aenescens , with entirely rounded apex, less densely setose ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ). Aedoeagus ( Figs. 24–27 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) quite different from that of O. aenescens , with right lateral portion of median lobe in ventral view conspicuously dilated, and with apex of median lobe missing short longitudinal carina on face adjacent to paramere ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ). Paramere situated on median lobe quite asymmetrically, of different shape ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ), in general distinctly longer and narrower, with acute apex not reaching apex of median lobe and without fine longitudinal carina on face away from median lobe; underside of paramere lacking sensory peg setae, but with minute sensory setae situated as in Fig. 27 View FIGURES 22 – 28 .

Female. Area behind anterior angles of pronotum sparingly punctate or almost impuncate. Tergite 10 of genital segment similar to that of O. aenescens , but narrower, with narrower apex ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ).

Body length 11.0–14.0 mm.

Geographical distribution. Ocypus inexspectatus occurs in the Russian Far East in Primorskyi Kray, from southern Ussuri area northwest to Lake Khanka and northeast to the southern portion of the Sikhote Alin mountain range.

Bionomics. Very little is known about the habitat requirements of this species. It occurs from lowland (100–300 m) to middle mountain elevations (650–900 m) in the Sikhote Alin mountain range.

Recognition and comments. Ocypus inexspectatus may only be confused with O. aenescens , the only other species that has the second abdominal tergite entirely punctate and pubescent. The two species may be easily distinguished by the differently shaped aedoeagi ( Figs. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 21 , 24 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ) and tergites 10 of the female genital segments ( Figs. 21 View FIGURES 15 – 21 , 28 View FIGURES 22 – 28 ), as well as by several external characters discussed in the description of O. inexspectatus . For the comparison with O. graeseri see the Comments under O. graeseri . Ocypus inexspectatus has not been yet recorded from the territory of the Peoples Republic of China.

CNC

Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes

NMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Genus

Ocypus

Loc

Ocypus (Pseudocypus) inexspectatus Eppelsheim, 1887

Smetana, Aleš 2009
2009
Loc

inexspectatus

Eppelsheim 1887
1887
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF