Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847
|
publication ID |
1464-5262 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E01E5B-FF87-F369-516E-72AB81D76F6E |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-08-27 00:45:51, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-04 22:37:22) |
|
scientific name |
Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847 |
| status |
|
Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847 View in CoL
(®gures 16±19)
Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847a: 125 View in CoL [nomen nudum] [type locality`Eastern Seas, Borneo’]
Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847b: 58 View in CoL [type locality`coast of Borneo’]; White, 1847c: 62 [text identical to White, 1847b]; Adams and White, 1848 ±1849: 33, plate 6: ®gure 7, 7a [colour plate] [Borneo]; Miers, 1879b: 19 [Billiton Island= Belitung island, Java Sea, Indonesia]; Haswell, 1880: 455 [Port Denison, Queensland, Australia]; Haswell, 1882: 38 [Port Denison, Queensland, Australia]; Miers, 1884: 182, 204 [Thursday Island, Torres Strait, Queensland, Australia]; Walker, 1887: 109 [ Singapore] [list only]; Ortmann, 1894: 6, 48 [list only]; Rathbun, 1910: 321 [Kram, Kahdat, Chuen and Kut Island, Gulf of Thailand]; Gordon, 1934: ®gure 32c [holotype re-examined]; Suvatti, 1950: 152 [list only]; SereÁne et al., 1958: 232, 238 [list only]; SereÁne, 1968: 63 [list only]; Stevcic et al., 1988: 1310 [list only]
Gonatonotus sp. Roxas, 1930: 18 [Puerto Galera, Mindoro island, Philippines]
Echinoecus pentagonus: Naiyanetr, 1980: 31 View in CoL (list only) [not Echinoecus pentagonus (A. Milne Edwards, 1879) View in CoL ]
Eumedonus pentagonus: Buitendijk, 1950: 71 View in CoL [Siglap, Singapore]; Johnson, 1962: 288 [ Singapore] [not Eumedon pentagonus A. Milne Edwards, 1879 View in CoL ]
Material examined. HOLOTYPE: female (10.1Ö 12.0 mm) ( BMNH 1847.21 ), eastern seas, Borneo, coll. Capt. Sir Edw. Belcher.
Others. Indonesia: One male (12.5Ö 15.3 mm) ( BMNH 78.11 ), Java seas, 3ss21¾S,108ss39 ¾E, 22 m, coll. J. G. Je reys, no other data . Singapore: One female ( ZRC 1984.785 View Materials 8), Sudong Island, dredged, coll. D. S. Johnson, 16 March 1953. One juvenile female ( ZRC 1984.785 View Materials 7), Pawai Island , shell, gravel substratum, on Cidaris sp. , 9 m, coll. D. S. Johnson, December 1952 . Thailand: One male, one female ( BPBM 1776 About BPBM ), Koh Chuen Island, 30 fms water, shell bottom, Gulf of Thailand, coll. Th. Mortensen, February 1900. Three males, three females (two ovigerous) ( USNM 39707 About USNM ), Koh Kram, 30 fms, Gulf of Thailand , coll. Th. Mortensen, 1 and 21 March 1900. One male, one female (ovigerous) ( USNM 39708 About USNM ), between Koh Rin and Cli Rock , north of Koh Kram , 15 fms, Gulf of Thailand , coll. Th. Mortensen, 2 March 1900 . Australia: One female ( QM W18673), Northwest Shelf, Western Australia, Station 01B13BT, 19ss45.7 ¾S, 117ss52.0 ¾E, 54 m, trawled, marine, sublittoral, coll. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scienti®c and Industrial Research Organisation), R. V.`Soela’, 20 February 1983. One male ( QM W18678), Northwest Shelf, Western Australia, Station 04B14BT, 19ss43.7¾S, 117ss54.4 ¾E, trawled, marine, sublittoral, coll. CSIRO, R. V.`Soela’, 2 September 1983. One male, one female ( QM W18685), Northwest Shelf, Western Australia, Station 04B17BT, 52 m, trawled, marine, sublittoral, coll. CSIRO, R. V.`Soela’, 4 September 1983. One male ( QM W18669), Northwest Shelf, Western Australia, 19ss57.9 ¾S, 117ss49.3 ¾E, Station 03D07BT, 40 m, trawled, marine, sublittoral, coll. CSIRO, R. V.`Soela’, 26 June 1983. One female ( QM W18677), Northwest Shelf, Western Australia, 19ss56.8¾S, 117ss53.4 ¾E, Station 02B02BT, trawled, marine, sublittoral, coll. CSIRO, R. V.` Soela’ , 22 February 1983. One male ( BMNH 82.7 ), Thursday Island , Torres Strait , coll. D. Coppinger, H.M.S.` Alert’ . One male ( BMNH 81.31 ), Thursday Island , Torres Strait , coll. June 81. Two females ( BMNH 62.35 ), northeast Australia , no other data. Three females ( BMNH 1948.4 .29.7±9), Cocos Keeling Islands , coll. Gibson Hill, no other data .
Description. Carapace pentagonal, rostrum short, slightly beyond orbits; inner supraorbital teeth absent; regions well de®ned; surfaces of carapace, chelipeds and ambulatory legs covered with numerous ¯attened granules; dorsal surface of carapac e not pileiferous. Antero- and posterolateral margins clearly demarcated by distinct angle or sharp tooth; anterolateral margin entire, without teeth or lobes, distinctly shorter than posterolateral margin. Lateral carapace teeth very stout, tip usually directed laterally; base of tooth stout and thick. Antennules folding obliquely, ca 45ss from horizontal; antennular fossae oblique. Antenna free, does not ®ll orbital hiatus, reaching into orbit; antennal basal segment rectangular. Eyes well developed, ®lling orbit; cornea distinct, pigmented; infraorbital teeth small but distinct, subhepatic teeth absent. Anterior surface of epistome not very low; posterior margin appears entire because of two fused truncate median lobes. Pterygostomial, subhepatic, suborbital regions granulated. Maxilliped 3 quadrate; ischium rectangular, median oblique sulcus deep; merus squarish, antero-external angle of merus not distinctly auriculiform; exopod just below antero-external edge of merus. Sutures between male thoracic sternites 1 and 2 indistinct, 2 and 3 distinct, shallow; between 3 and 4 interrupted; surface of male thoracic sternite 1 smooth, of sternite 2±3 granulated; lateral clefts small. Abdomen seven-segmented, sutures for all segments visible; segment 7 not very depressed into abdominal groove. Chelipeds granulose; dorsal margin of palm does not have distinct lamelliform crests; carpus with distinct spine on distal inner angle; proximal median part of merus with a strong tooth; no tooth at inner proximal margin but replaced by a row of tall tubercles appearing serrated; chela short, stout, palm length two times length of ®ngers, palm height ca two to three times height of ®ngers; ®ngers sometimes carinate, pollex not bent downwards. Anterior margins of ambulatory merus, carpus and propodus not cristate, lined with numerous sharp and rounded granules; posterior margin of merus does not have parallel crests; dactylus of leg 1 not much longer than those of other legs. G1 long, slender, distal part lined with short spines, tip bent approximately 90ss. G2 relatively short, distal segment short.
Sexual dimorphism. None.
Remarks. Specimens reported by Miers (1879b, 1884), Haswell (1880, 1882), Rathbun (1910) and Roxas (1930) seem to ®t the current understanding of this species. Naiyanetr (1980) incorrectly reported a specimen from Thailand as `Echinoecus pentagonus (White, 1847) ’. This is possibly due in part to the confusion in Eumedonus s. l. His record is now re-determined as G. pentagonus . Buitendijk (1950) referred to a female specimen, in her possession as `Eumedonus pentagonus ’, from Singapore, but her specimen cannot be traced, it is not in the ZRC or RMNH. Still, from her description, there can be little doubt that her specimens ®t well into the current concept of G. pentagonus .
The two ZRC female specimens from Singapore had been incorrectly reported as `Eumedonus pentagonus ’ by Johnson (1962) (not Eumedon pentagonus A. Milne Edwards, 1879 ). The smaller female ( ZRC 1984.785 7) is still rather young, with the abdomen triangular and not covering most of the sternum, and the pleopods are poorly developed. The other female ( ZRC 1984.785 8) is ovigerous but none of the eggs are well developed. Both specimens agree very well with G. pentagonus s. str. The specimens from Indonesia and Australia agree in almost all respects with the holotype female and specimens from Singapore.
Distribution. On both Sunda and Sahul Shelves.
Gonatonotu s granulosu s ( MacGilchrist, 1905) n. comb. (®gures 20, 21)
Eumedonus granulosus MacGilchrist, 1905: 253 View in CoL [type locality Persian Gulf]; Alcock, Annandale and MacGilchrist, 1907: plate 77, ®gure 2, 2a [Persian Gulf]; Rathbun, 1911: 194, 259 [Amirante Islands, Indian Ocean]; Flipse, 1930: 80, 90 [list only]; Ward, 1942: 53, 78 [ Mauritius]; Stephensen, 1946: 114, 204 [list only]; Barnard, 1954: 96, ®gure 1 [Delagoa Bay= LourencËo Marques Bay, Mozambique, East Africa]; Barnard, 1955: 3, 18 [Delagoa Bay= LourencËo Marques Bay, Mozambique, East Africa]; Barnard, 1958: 4 [ Mozambique Island, Mozambique, East Africa]; SereÁne et al., 1958: 146 [in key], 237, ®gure 1G, 1H [list only] (part); Guinot, 1964: 7, 9, 14, ®gure 4 [Dahlak Archipelago, Red Sea]; Michel, 1964: 7 [ Mauritius]; Guinot, 1966: 299 [list only]; SereÁne, 1968: 63 [list only] (part); Kensley, 1969: 151, 155, 178, ®gure 1 [ Mozambique, East Africa]; SereÁne, 1977: 49 [ Seychelles]; Kensley, 1981: 41 [list only]; Wu, 1983: 134 [name in Chinese]; Stevcic et al., 1988: 1310 [list only] (part)
Eumedonus zebra: Lenz, 1905: 344 View in CoL [Kokotoni, Zanzibar] [not Eumedonus zebra Alcock, 1895 View in CoL ]
Material examined. Zanzibar: One female ( BMNH 1953.5.28. 4), beach at Kivengwa , presented by J. D. Robertson (Prace Memorial Museum), no other data . Madagascar: Seven males (11.6Ö 11.1 mm, 7.5Ö 7.2 mm, 9.5 Ö 9.2 mm), ten females ( MNHN), ORSTOM number AC113 ±129, northwest coast, Mitsio Island, 30 m, trawl, sand substratum, probably on echinoderms, coll. A. Crosnier, February 1960 . Seychelles: One male, one female ( RMNH D42519), west of Poivre Atoll , Station Sey. 778, 5ss46¾S, 53ss11¾E, 57 m, Agassiz trawl, soft bottom, from echinoids, coll. NIOP-E,`Tyro’ Seychelles Expedition 1992/9, 1 January 1993 . Amirante Islands : One male, one female (damaged) ( USNM 41452 About USNM ), western Indian Ocean, Station E11, 46 ± 146 m, coll. H.M.S.`Sealark’, 11 October 1905 .
Diagnosis. Carapace pentagonal, rostrum long, length 0.8±1.1 times width (mean value 0.9); central part of ventral surface of rostrum not raised; inner supraorbital teeth absent; regions well de®ned; surfaces of carapace, chelipeds and ambulatory legs covered with numerous tall and distinct granules; dorsal surface of carapace not pileiferous. Antero- and posterolateral margins clearly demarcated by distinct angle or sharp tooth; anterolateral margin entire, without teeth or lobes, distinctly shorter than posterolateral margin. Lateral carapace teeth very sharp, tip usually directed laterally; base of tooth stout and thick. Anterior part of interantennular septum not depressed. Maxilliped 3 quadrate; ischium rectangular, median oblique sulcus deep; merus squarish, antero-external angle of merus not distinctly auriculiform; exopod just below antero-external edge of merus. Abdomen seven-segmented, sutures for all segments visible; segment 7 depressed into the abdominal groove. Chelipeds granulose; dorsal margin of palm with small lamelliform crests; carpus with distinct spine on distal inner angle; proximal inner, outer and median parts of merus with two or three teeth each; chela short, stout, palm length two times length of ®ngers, palm height ca two to three times height of ®ngers; ®ngers sometimes carinate, pollex not bent downwards. Anterior margins of ambulatory merus, carpus and propodus not cristate, lined with numerous sharp and rounded granules; posterior margin of merus with low, indistinct parallel crests; dactylus of leg 1 not much longer than those of other legs. G1 long, slightly more sinuous, distal part lined with short spines, tip bent approximately 90ss but slightly more inwards.
Sexual dimorphism. High lamelliform crests on dorsal margin of palm in females, low in males.
Remarks. The current series of specimens examined agrees well with the description of MacGilchrist (1905). Specimens ( USNM 41452) reported by Rathbun (1911) were examined; they were badly damaged but still clearly identi®able as G. granulosus . From the various descriptions and illustrations by Alcock et al. (1907), Ward (1942), Barnard (1954, 1955, 1958), Guinot (1964), Michel (1964), Kensley (1969) and SereÁne (1977), their specimens also ®t into the current de®nition of this species. We agree with Monod (1938: 111) that the specimen reported by Lenz (1905) as `Eumedonus zebra ’ is in fact G. granulosus .
This species shares close a nities with G. nasutus n. sp. (di erences discussed under G. nasutus ).
Some variation is observed in the current series of specimens. The rostral tips of some specimens may appear to be almost fused (®gure 21M, N), instead of bilobed as observed in most specimens (®gure 21A).
This species has an overlapping distribution with E. zebra in the Indian Ocean. But the di erences between the two species are distinct, viz. the antero-external angle of the merus is not distinctly auriculiform in G. granulosus (distinctly so in E. zebra ), the anterior margins of all ambulatory meri are not cristate and lamelliform in G. granulosus (distinctly so in E. zebra ), and G. granulosus is far more granulose (much smoother in E. zebra ).
Distribution. Only known from the Indian Ocean.
ADAMS, A. and WHITE, A., 1848, 1849, Crustacea, in A. Adams (ed.) T he Zoology of the Voyage of the H. M. S. Samarang; under the Command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher, C. B., F. R. A. F. G. S. during the Y ears 1843 ± 1846 (London: Reeve, Benham and Reeve), viii + 66 pp., plates 1 ± 13 [pp. 1 ± 32 and plates 1 ± 6 were published in 1848; pp. i ± viii, 33 ± 66 and plates 7 ± 13 in 1849].
ALCOCK, A., 1895, The Brachyura Oxyrhyncha. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India, No. 1, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 64 (2) (2), 157 ± 291, plates 3 ± 5.
ALCOCK, A., ANNANDALE, N. and MACGILCHRIST, A. C., 1907, Illustration of the zoology of the Royal Indian marine survey ship Investigator, under the command of Captain T. H. Heming, R. N. (retired). Crustacea (Malacostraca), 4: plates 77 ± 79. Crustacea (Entomostraca), 1, plates 1 ± 2. Mollusca, 4: pls, 14 ± 18 (Calcutta).
BARNARD, K. H., 1954, Notes sur une collection de crustace As de Acapodes de la re Agion malagache, Me Amoires de l' Institut Scienti ® que de Madagascar, A (9), 95 ± 104.
BARNARD, K. H., 1955, Additions to the fauna-list of South African Crustacea and Pycnogonida, Annals of the South African Museum, 43 (1), 1 ± 107.
BARNARD, K. H., 1958, Further additions to the crustacean fauna-list of Portuguese East African, Memo Arias do Museu Dr. Alvaro de Castro, 4, 1 ± 23.
BUITENDIJK, 1950, On a small collection of Decapoda Brachyura, chie ¯ y Dromiidae and Oxyrhyncha, from the neighbourhood of Singapore, Bulletin of the Raƒes Museum, 21, 59 ± 82.
FLIPSE, H. J., 1930, Oxyrrhyncha [sic]: Parthenopidae. Die Decapoda Brachyura der Siboga- Expedition, VI, Siboga-Expeditie, 39 c 2 (112), 1 ± 96. [University of Amsterdam edition has an added introduction in Dutch and a di erent pagination.]
GORDON, I., 1934, Crustacea Brachyura. Re Asultats Scienti ® ques du Voyage aux Indes Occidentales Ne Aerlandaises de le Prince et la Princesse Le Aopold de Belgique, Me Amoires du Muse Aum d' Histoire Naturelle, Belgique, 3 (15), 1 ± 78.
GUINOT, D., 1964, Sur une collection de Crustace As De Acapodes Brachyoures de Mer Rouge et de Somalie. Remarques sur les genres Calappa Weber, Menaethiops Alcock, T yche Bell,
GUINOT, D., 1966, La faune carcinologique (Crustacea Brachyura) de l' Oce Aan Indien occidental et de la Mer Rouge. Catalogue, remarques bioge Aographiques et bibliographie, Me Amoires de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire, 77, 235 ± 352.
HASWELL, W. A., 1880, On the Australian Brachyura Oxyrhyncha, Proceedings of the L innaean Society of New South W ales, 4, 431 ± 458, plates 25 ± 27.
HASWELL, W. A., 1882, Catalogue of the Australian Stalk-and Sessile-eyed Crustacea (Sydney: Australian Museum), pp. xxiv + 324, plates 1 ± 4.
JOHNSON, D. S., 1962, Commensalism and semi-parasitism amongst decapod Crustacea in Singapore waters, Proceedings of the First Regional Symposium on Scienti ® c Knowledge in Tropical Parasites (Singapore: University of Singapore), pp. 282 ± 288.
KENSLEY, B. F., 1969, Decapod Crustacea from the south-west Indian Ocean, Annals South African Museum, 52 (7), 149 ± 181.
KENSLEY, B. F., 1981, On the zoogeography of Southern African decapod Crustacea, with a distributional checklist of the species, Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 338, 1 ± 64.
LENZ, H., 1905, Ostafrikananische Dekapoden und Stomatopoden. Gesammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr. A. Voeltzkow, bearbeitet von Prof. Dr. H. Kenz in LuE beck. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Reisen in Madagaskar und Ostafrika in den Jahren 1889 ± 95 von Dr. A. Voeltzkow, Band III, Abhandlunge n Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 27 (4), 339 ± 392, plates 47 ± 48.
MACGILCHRIST, A. C., 1905, An account of the new and some of the rarer decapod Crustacea obtained during the surveying seasons 1901 ± 1904. Natural history notes from the R. I. M. S.`Investigator' Capt. T. H. Heming, R. N. (retired) commanding, Series III, No. 6, Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7 (15), 233 ± 268.
MICHEL, C., 1964, Check list of the Crustacea Brachyura (crabs) recorded from Mauritius, Bulletin of the Mauritius Institute, 6 (1), 1 ± 48.
MIERS, E. J., 1879 b, On a collection of Crustacea made by Capt. H. C. St. John, R. N., in the Korean and Japanese Seas. Part I. Podophthalmia. With an appendix by Capt. H. C. St. John, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of L ondon, 1879, 18 ± 61, plates 1 ± 3.
MIERS, E. J., 1884, Crustacea, in Report on the Zoological Collections made in the Indo-Paci ® c Ocean during the V oyage of H. M. S. Alert' 1881 ± 2 (London: British Museum), pp. 1178 ± 322, plates 18 ± 34.
MILNE EDWARDS, A., 1879, Description de quelques Crustace As nouveaux, Bulletin de la Socie Ate Philomatique Paris, 7 (3), 103 ± 110, plates 1 ± 2.
MONOD, T., 1938, Decapoda Brachyura. Mission Robert Ph. Dollfus en Egypte, VIII, Me Amoires, Institut d' Egypte, 37, 91 ± 162.
NAIYANETR, P., 1980, Crustacean fauna of T hailand (Decapoda and Stomatopoda) (Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University), 73 pp. [Mimeographed.]
ORTMANN, A., 1894, Crustaceen, in R. Semon (ed.) Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien und dem Malayischen archipel, Vol. 5: Systematik und Thiergeographie, Denkschriften der Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftichen Gesellschaft zu Jena, 8, 3 ± 80, plates 1 ± 3.
RATHBUN, M. J., 1910, Brachyura. The Danish Expedition to Siam 1899 ± 1900. Det Kongelige Danske V idenskabernes Selskabs skrifter, 7 Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling, 5 (4): 301 ± 368, plates 1 ± 2.
RATHBUN, M. J., 1911, Marine Brachyura. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under the leadership of Mr J. Stanley Gardiner, volume 3, number 11, Transactions of the L innaean Society of L ondon, 14 (2), 191 ± 261, plates 15 ± 20.
ROXAS, H. A., 1930, T he Puerto Galera Marine Biological L aboratory of the University of the Philippines. (A report to the President of the University, together with a check-list of animals of the Puerto Galera region) (Manila: University of the Philippines), 24 pp., plates 1 ± 4.
STEPHENSEN, K., 1946, The Brachyura of the Iranian Gulf with an appendix: The male pleopoda of the Brachyura, Danish Scienti ® c Investigations in Iran, 4, 57 ± 237. [Dated 1945 but issued in 1946.]
STEVCIC, Z., CASTRO, P. and GORE, R. H., 1988, Re-establishment of the Family Eumedonidae Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Brachyura), Journal of Natural History, 22, 1301 ± 1324.
SUVATTI, C., 1950, Fauna of T hailand (Bangkok: Department of Fisheries), ii + 1100 pp., plate 1.
WALKER, A. O., 1887, Notes on a collection of Crustacea from Singapore, Journal of the L innean Society, Zoology, 20, 107 ± 117, plates 6 ± 9.
WARD, M., 1942, Notes on the Crustacea of the Desjardins Museum, Mauritius Institute with descriptions of new genera and species, Bulletin of the Mauritius Institute, 2 (2), 49 ± 108, plates 5 ± 6.
WHITE, A., 1847 a, L ist of the Specimens of Crustacea in the Collection of the British Museum (London: British Museum), viii + 143 pp.
WHITE, A., 1847 b, Descriptions of new Crustacea from the Eastern Seas, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of L ondon, 15, 56 ± 58.
WHITE, A., 1847 c, Descriptions of new Crustacea from the Eastern Seas, Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20 (130), 61 ± 63.
WU, P. (ed.), 1983, L atin-Chinese Marine Organism Names (Beijing: Ocean Press), pp. 1 ± 822. [In Chinese.]
| QM |
Queensland Museum |
| CSIRO |
Australian National Fish Collection |
| R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
| V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
| ZRC |
Zoological Reference Collection, National University of Singapore |
| RMNH |
National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis |
| MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
| ORSTOM |
Office de la Recherche scientifique et Technique Outre-mer |
| USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Gonatonotus pentagonus White, 1847
| Ng, Diana G. B. Chia Peter K. L. 2000 |
Echinoecus pentagonus: Naiyanetr, 1980: 31
| NAIYANETR, P. 1980: 31 |
Eumedonus pentagonus:
| JOHNSON, D. S. 1962: 288 |
| BUITENDIJK 1950: 71 |
Gonatonotus sp. Roxas, 1930: 18
| ROXAS, H. A. 1930: 18 |
Eumedonus granulosus
| STEVCIC, Z. & CASTRO, P. & GORE, R. H. 1988: 1310 |
| WU, P. 1983: 134 |
| KENSLEY, B. F. 1981: 41 |
| KENSLEY, B. F. 1969: 151 |
| GUINOT, D. 1966: 299 |
| GUINOT, D. 1964: 7 |
| MICHEL, C. 1964: 7 |
| BARNARD, K. H. 1958: 4 |
| BARNARD, K. H. 1955: 3 |
| BARNARD, K. H. 1954: 96 |
| STEPHENSEN, K. 1946: 114 |
| WARD, M. 1942: 53 |
| FLIPSE, H. J. 1930: 80 |
| RATHBUN, M. J. 1911: 194 |
| MACGILCHRIST, A. C. 1905: 253 |
Eumedonus zebra:
| LENZ, H. 1905: 344 |
Gonatonotus pentagonus
| WHITE, A. 1847: 125 |
Gonatonotus pentagonus
| STEVCIC, Z. & CASTRO, P. & GORE, R. H. 1988: 1310 |
| SUVATTI, C. 1950: 152 |
| RATHBUN, M. J. 1910: 321 |
| ORTMANN, A. 1894: 6 |
| WALKER, A. O. 1887: 109 |
| MIERS, E. J. 1884: 182 |
| HASWELL, W. A. 1882: 38 |
| HASWELL, W. A. 1880: 455 |
| MIERS, E. J. 1879: 19 |
| WHITE, A. 1847: 58 |
| WHITE, A. 1847: 62 |