Oroides, Tomaszewska, Wioletta & Ślipiński, Adam, 2012
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.279902 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6168423 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E387F1-FFF7-FFF3-FF33-8D6E5385FBC7 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Oroides |
| status |
gen. nov. |
Oroides gen. nov.
(Figs. 1–4)
Type species. Oroides pakaluki sp. nov.
Etymology. The generic name is derived from the Oro (Northern) Province of Papua New Guinea where the beetle was found. Gender masculine.
Diagnosis. Oroides differs from all known Coccinellidae in the corylophid-like body, short and strongly
heteromeroid trochanters, broad and flattened femora receiving narrow tibiae in dorsal grooves, procoxal cavities
circular with very long and narrow slits and antennal scape bearing large sensory areas. Description. Body (Figs. 1, 2A) broadly oval, weakly convex with anterior margin of pronotum arcuate and
entirely covering head from above; body resembling an oversized Corylophus Stephens (Corylophidae) ; fully
winged.
Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E) 0.75 times as long as wide;
subantennal grooves absent. Eyes large, moderately
coarsely facetted, dorsally about 0.5 times length of
head capsule, not emarginate, with inner orbits
arcuate or weakly converging towards vertex;
interfacetal setae absent. Antennal insertions
somewhat frontal, not visible from above. Antenna
( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 A) 11-segmented; scape 2.4 times as long as
pedicel, asymmetrically produced externally with a
few large pits along outer edge ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B); pedicel
asymmetrical, distinctly narrower than scape, 0.7
times as long as wide; antennomere 3 distinctly
broadening towards apex, 1.6 times longer than
wide, and about 1.5 times as long as 4; antennomere
4 about 0.75 times as long as 5; antennomeres 3 and
4 glabrous, without punctation or microsculpture;
antennomeres 6 and 7 strongly transverse. Antennal
club asymmetrical, 4-segmented, compact with
large sensory areas. Anterior clypeal margin
arcuate; labrum large, shallowly emarginate.
Mandible ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 D, 3E) with single apical tooth;
prostheca large, shortly setose; mola reduced and
weakly sclerotized, without molar tooth. Maxillary
cardo weakly transverse; galea small ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F),
rounded with tuft of stiff apical setae; lacinia
vestigial; terminal palpomere as long as wide,
weakly expanded toward apex, obliquely truncate
apically ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 F). Mentum transverse, about 1.6
times broader than long; anterior margin emarginate FIGURE 1. Oroides pakaluki sp. nov., habitus.
medially; ventral surface smooth, moderately coarsely punctate and sparsely setose latero-apically; prementum nearly as long as broad; ligula parallel-sided; labial palps separated by distance about equal to width of palpiger; apical palpomere longer and as broad as penultimate one; submentum distinct.
Pronotum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F) arcuate anteriorly, covering head from above; anterior and lateral edges not margined; hind edge sinuate with distinct marginal line; hind angles weakly prominent posteriorly and acute. Prothoracic hypomeron ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 D) deeply concave posteriorly, receiving fore femora; notosternal suture distinct. Prosternal process moderately broad, rounded apically, reaching far behind coxae and widening from mid length of coxa towards apex; surface smooth. Prosternum arcuate; anterior margin simple with complete bordering line; procoxal cavity oval, with very long and narrow slit between prosternum and hypomeron.
Mesovenrite ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 C) deeply concave anteriorly, receiving apex of prosternal process; meso-metaventral process about as broad as corresponding coxal diameter; articulation arcuate anteriorly with suture well visible; without internal knob.
Scutellum triangular, weakly transverse; surface punctate and setose. Elytra ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) with lateral margins very narrow, visible from above for half of their length; surfaces ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C) finely, irregularly and moderately densely punctate and setose; elytral epipleuron oblique; broad anteriorly, obsolete in apical third; without foveae for receptions of legs, ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B).
Metaventrite large; metaventral postcoxal lines shallow, joined medially, complete, arcuate but posteriorly angled apically; postero-lateral parts of metaventrite, metaepimera and hind coxa deeply concave receiving hind femora in repose ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H); metendosternite stalk nearly as long as broad; tendons separated by about half width of stalk and placed on laminae.
Legs short and stout, flattened; trochanters long oval; trochantero-femoral attachment strongly oblique ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 B, 3C); femora large, oval with deep grooves nearly throughout for receiving tibiae; tibiae subcylindrical, narrowing gradually towards their apices; hind tibia with short double spurs weakly visible among stout spines surrounding tibial apex; tarsi short and slender, 4-segmented; pretarsal claws appendiculate.
Abdomen ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H) with 6 ventrites; ventrites 1 and 2 solidly fused with trace of suture laterally, and combined 1.3 times longer than 3–6; abdominal postcoxal lines separate medially, Diomus - type, incomplete, extending down from base and running parallel to and near hind margin of ventrite 1; ventrite 5 smooth and simply setose, with hind margin rounded; hind margin of male ventrite 6 weakly emarginate ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 G), tergite VIII rounded. Sternite IX with central part membranous; apodeme of male sternum IX rod like ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 D).
Male genitalia ( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 A–C). Parameres articulated with phallobase, well developed, simple and separated, slightly shorter than penis guide, densely setose along at least half of their length; penis guide simple with lateral sides symmetrical; tegminal strut simple. Penis arcuate with base with both arms equally developed and apex spirally pointed.
Female unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.