Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/3840.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:31D0A422-F386-410D-973F-A28FA21A09DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5460753 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E5A832-FFB4-0530-A7F1-87BA323C92C0 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876 |
status |
|
Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876 View in CoL
Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876: 219–220 View in CoL .
Tityus chinchoxensis Karsch, 1879: 370–372 (synonymized by Kraepelin, 1899: 57).
Uroplectes andreae Pocock, 1899: 835 , new synonym.
TYPE MATERIAL: Uroplectes andreae Pocock, 1899 , holotype ♀ ( BMNH 1900.9.10.1 ), DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: Kasai Province: Kassai [Kasai], on Loange River , Upper Congo .
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL: ANGOLA: 1 ♀ ( NMSA 18679 About NMSA ex ANG 3544 About ANG /4960). DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: J.C. Heymans, 1 ♀ [homotype] ( NMSA 11027 About NMSA ) , 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ( NMSA 11028 About NMSA ) , 1 ♂ ( NMSA 11029 About NMSA ) ; Sandra , 1932, G.F. Overlaet, 5 ♀ ( MRAC 23.939 View Materials /943), 1 ♂, 4 ♀, 1 subad. ♀ ( MRAC 23.944 View Materials /949) . Kasai Province: N Kasai, Ikese , 8.v.1946, Lagae, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ ( MRAC 135.115 View Materials ) . Lualaba Province: Kisenge, Dilolo [10°41′S 22°21′E], ix.1963, A. Regnard, 1 ♂, 3 ♀, 1 juv. ♀ ( MRAC 126.086 View Materials ) GoogleMaps . Tanganyika Province: Mpala [06°45′S 29°31′E], 6.vii.1953, H. Bomans, 3 ♂, 1 ♀ ( MRAC 75.966 View Materials ) GoogleMaps , viii.1953, 1 ♂, 3 ♀, 1 juv. ♂ ( MRAC 85.143 View Materials – 147 View Materials ) .
REMARKS: The holotype of U. andreae was compared with nontype material of U. occidentalis from across the known distribution of the species, including one specimen from Angola and five from the Democratic Republic of Congo in the NMSA determined as U. andreae by B.H. Lamoral in 1977, among them a “homotype,” accompanied by a note stating “compared to holotype female of Uroplectes andreae (BMNH 1900.9.10.1) by B. Lamoral, 1977, and found to be conspecific.” Although poorly preserved, the holotype of U. andreae closely resembled other material in the BMNH labelled “ U. occidentalis var. andreae ” based on the presence of spiniform granules on the dorsosubmedian carinae of metasomal segments IV and V, the diagnostic characters provided by Pocock (1899) to separate U. andreae from U. occidentalis , typical specimens of which exhibit spiniform granules on the dorsosubmedian carinae of segments I–III only. As the presence and development of spiniform granules on segments IV and V was observed to vary among otherwise morphologically similar specimens of U. occidentalis , and no other diagnostic differences appear to separate U. andreae from the latter, they are considered conspecific and newly synonymized: Uroplectes andreae Pocock, 1899 = Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876 , new synonym.
BMNH |
United Kingdom, London, The Natural History Museum [formerly British Museum (Natural History)] |
NMSA |
South Africa, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Natal Museum |
MRAC |
Belgium, Tervuren, Musee Royal de l'Afrique Centrale |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Uroplectes occidentalis Simon, 1876
Prendini, Lorenzo 2015 |
Uroplectes andreae
Pocock, R. I. 1899: 835 |
Tityus chinchoxensis
Kraepelin, K. 1899: 57 |
Karsch, F. 1879: 372 |
Uroplectes occidentalis
Simon, E. 1876: 220 |