Labops, BURMEISTER, 1835

Tatarnic, Nikolai J. & Cassis, Gerasimos, 2012, The Halticini of the world (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae): generic reclassification, phylogeny, and host plant associations, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 164 (3), pp. 558-658 : 607-612

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00770.x

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8878D-FFDC-FFD4-5D8F-FC7AB734FB10

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Labops
status

 

LABOPS BURMEISTER View in CoL View at ENA ( FIGS 4 View Figure 4 , 33–36 View Figure 33 View Figure 34 View Figure 35 View Figure 36 )

Labops Burmeister, 1835: 279 View in CoL [gen. nov.; type species: Labops diopsis Burmeister, 1835 View in CoL by monotypy (junior synonym of Capsus sahlbergii Fallén, 1829 View in CoL )]; Fieber, 1858: 316 (key); Fieber, 1860a: 294; 1861 (key, descr.); Flor, 1860: 448 (key); Thompson, 1871: 432 (key); Walker, 1873: 44 (cat.); Reuter, 1875a: 24 (key); Reuter, 1875b (1): 86 (2):97 (key, descr.); Provancher, 1887: 135 (descr.); Atkinson, 1890: 120 (cat.); Reuter, 1891: 80, 160 (descr., key); Hueber, 1906: 5 (key); Kirkaldy, 1906: 131 (cat.); Oshanin, 1910: 786 (cat.); Reuter, 1910: 148 (cat.); Van Duzee, 1916: 211 (key); Van Duzee, 1917: 373 (cat.); Knight, 1922: 258 (key, n. spp.); Blatchley, 1926: 797 (key, spp. nov.); Stichel, 1933: 235 (key); Knight, 1941: 81; Slater, 1950: 51 (genitalia); Kiritshenko, 1951: 126 (key); Carvalho, 1952: 74 (cat.); Slater, 1954: 57 (note); Carvalho, 1955: 66 (key); Carvalho, 1958: 18 (cat.); Kerzhner, 1964a: 964 (diag., key); Kelton, 1980: 189 (diag., key); Kerzhner, 1988: 43 (illustrated key to east Asian spp.); Schuh, 1995: 58 (world cat.).

Ophthalmocoris Zetterstedt, 1838: 280 gen. nov. (syn. by Herrich-Schäeffer, 1850:166).

Diagnosis: Readily distinguished from other Halticini by the following combination of characters: tall head and stylate eyes; hemelytra of brachypterous individuals nearly covering abdomen; aedeagus with mass of thin, needle-like spicules suspended in the membrane anterior to secondary gonopore; posterior wall of bursa copulatrix with paired inter-ramal sclerites similar to those found in other Orthotylinae ; DLP often with heavily sclerotized inter-ramal bridge.

Redescription: Coloration ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ): mostly dark, dull brown to black, usually with yellow, orange, or reddish markings. Head: black with yellow markings, particularly on vertex, along midline, and on genae, mandibular and maxillary plates. Hemelytra black, sometimes with white or yellow along costal margins. Surface and vestiture ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 33A–H View Figure 33 ): clothed in simple setae and pale, scale-like setae. Head smooth and setaceous. Antennae and legs with erect and semi-erect spines, particularly on AI and tibiae. Posterior of pronotum and scutellum rugulose. Hemelytra clothed in simple setae or both simple and scale-like setae. Structure: body elongate-oval. Head ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 33A–C View Figure 33 ): transverse and tall; genae height> two times eye height; eyes stylate, projecting laterally and slightly upward, extending well beyond the anterolateral margins of the pronotum; frons steep, with faint folds radiating from midline; mandibular plate sometimes tumescent, especially males. Labium ( Fig. 33C View Figure 33 ): variable, sometimes reaching metacoxae; LI swollen. Antennae ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 33A–C View Figure 33 ): insertion below eye; shorter than insect; AI swollen, shorter to longer than pronotum, approximately twice as long as eye height. Thorax ( Figs 4 View Figure 4 , 33A, C, D View Figure 33 ): pronotum campanulate, collar thin and flat, callosite region well defined, posterior margin weakly concave; mesoscutum broad; scutellum small, triangular; metathoracic spiracle small and exposed, thinly surrounded with evaporative bodies; MTG external efferent system broad, swollen and triangular, encompassing lower half of tergite, ostiole prominent and elongate, peritreme tongue-shaped, situated above ostiole in middle of evaporative area, angled rearward parallel to posterior margin of tergite. Hemelytra ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ): both sexes with brachypterous and macropterous morphs, degree of brachyptery varying across species ( Slater, 1954); length variable in brachypterous morphs but generally covering much if not all of the abdomen, cuneus sometimes differentiated, membrane either absent or vestigial; in macropterous morphs hemelytra extend beyond abdomen, margins gently rounded; membrane with two cells. Legs: long, metafemur not greatly swollen; pretarsi without fleshy pulvilli. Abdomen: elongate-oval. Male genitalia ( Figs 33F–H View Figure 33 , 34A–E View Figure 34 , 36A–D View Figure 36 ): pygophore simple and conical, ventral margin extending slightly caudad, left ventrolateral margin sulcate below left paramere; left paramere either straight or with obtusely angled apophysis, apophysis weakly curved to strongly angled apically, sensory lobe often prominent; right paramere extends caudally out of pygophore, considerably larger than left paramere, with long base, apex with laterally deflected concave club; apex of phallotheca with serrate, plate-like process of variable size projecting from the left of phallothecal opening; ductus seminis elongate, secondary gonopore sclerotized, vaguely bowl-shaped with a prised operculum, with scale-like texturing along opening margin; endosoma with tight bundle of sclerotized needles, sometimes also with other sclerotized processes, including thin strips of sclerotized teeth. Female genitalia ( Figs 34D–G View Figure 34 , 35A–B View Figure 35 , 36E–G View Figure 36 ): sclerotized rings large, elongateelliptical, diagonal, medially subcontiguous, lateral margins somewhat upturned; margin of VLP adjoining rami sclerotized, sometimes medially with paired teeth, lateral-most region of VLP joined with rami to form paired, medially projecting, sclerotized processes, sometimes covered with fields of spines; DLP sometimes with heavily sclerotized, bilaterally ventrally pointed inter-ramal bridge, sometimes reduced to paired pincer-like lateral sclerites, a simple band of

THE HALTICINI OF THE WORLD 611

tissue or completely membranous; posterior wall of bursa copulatrix with bilaterally symmetrical interramal lobes of varying complexity projecting from posterior wall; margins of first gonapophyses symmetrical, swollen, and sclerotized.

Diversity and distribution: Labops is comprised of 12 species and exhibits a Holarctic distribution.

Included species: Labops bami Kulik, 1979 Russia Labops brooksi Slater, 1954 Canada

Labops burmeisteri Stål, 1858 Holarctic View in CoL

Labops chelifer Slater, 1954 View in CoL Canada

Labops hesperius Uhler, 1872 View in CoL * Canada; USA Labops hirtus Knight, 1922 View in CoL Canada; USA Labops nivchorum Kerzhner, 1988 View in CoL Russia

Labops sahlbergii ( Fallén, 1829) View in CoL * Scandinavia; Siberia (Ural)

Labops setosus Reuter, 1891 View in CoL Russia

Labops tumidifrons Knight, 1922 View in CoL * Canada

Labops utahensis Slater, 1954 View in CoL * USA

Labops verae Knight, 1929 View in CoL USA

Biology and host plant associations: Species of Labops are associated with grasses in arid conditions ( Slater, 1954). In North America, L. hesperius has been recorded on Agropyron cristatum , various range grasses, Rosa arkansana ( Kelton, 1980) , Koeleria cristata , Poa secunda , Stipa comata , Stipa williamsi , Hordeum sp. , Triticum sativum ( Mills, 1939: in Slater, 1954), and wheat ( Mills, 1941), whereas L. hirtus has been recorded on wheat in Montana ( Mills, 1939) . In Yakutia, Vinokurov (1979) recorded the genus on cereals and sedges ( Carex stenophylla , Critesion jubatum , and Leymus sp. ), and suggested that it may decrease productivity of pastures and hay fields ( Table 1).

Remarks: Labops has previously been treated as its own tribe, Labopini, owing to various characteristics unique to the genus ( Knight, 1923). Slater was the first to note the unusual female genitalia of Labops – both the posterior wall (1950, 1954) and the interramal bridge (1954). Slater (1950) questioned whether the sclerotized inter-ramal tumescences on the posterior wall might be homologous to the interramal lobes (i.e. K-structures) found in other Orthotylinae – the absence of which has been considered a synapomorphy for the Halticini ( Schuh, 1974) . However, with the discovery of inter-ramal tumescences in both Anapus and Scirtetellus , we consider these to be homologous in origin. Despite the presence of inter-ramal lobes in Labops , Scirtetellus , and Anapus , our phylogeny instead places Labops as sister to Myrmecophyes based on four unambiguous characters, including one synapomorphy (56–1: apex of phallotheca with a prominent flange).

The inter-ramal bridge ( Kullenberg, 1947; Slater, 1950, 1954) is another interesting structure otherwise absent in the Halticini (although Anapus , Barbarosia , and Euryopicoris possess a sclerotized plate on the DLP, which may be homologous).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Miridae

Loc

Labops

Tatarnic, Nikolai J. & Cassis, Gerasimos 2012
2012
Loc

Ophthalmocoris

Herrich-Schaeffer GAW 1850: 166
Zetterstedt JW 1838: 280
1838
Loc

Labops

Kerzhner IM 1988: 43
Kelton LA 1980: 189
Kerzhner IM 1964: 964
Carvalho JCM 1958: 18
Carvalho JCM 1955: 66
Slater JAS 1954: 57
Kiritshenko AN 1951: 126
Slater JAS 1950: 51
Knight HH 1941: 81
Stichel W 1933: 235
Blatchley WS 1926: 797
Knight HH 1922: 258
Van Duzee EP 1917: 373
Van Duzee EP 1916: 211
Oshanin B 1910: 786
Reuter OM 1910: 148
Hueber T 1906: 5
Kirkaldy GW 1906: 131
Reuter OM 1891: 80
Atkinson ET 1890: 120
Provancher L 1887: 135
Reuter OM 1875: 24
Walker F 1873: 44
Thompson CG 1871: 432
Fieber FX 1860: 294
Flor G 1860: 448
Fieber FX 1858: 316
Burmeister HCC 1835: 279
1835
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF