Nesiergus halophilus Benoit 1978

Guadanucci, José Paulo L. & Gallon, Richard C., 2008, A revision of the spider genera Chaetopelma Ausserer 1871 and Nesiergus Simon 1903 (Araneae, Theraphosidae, Ischnocolinae), Zootaxa 1753, pp. 34-48 : 44-46

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181769

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229597

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E88792-FFEC-F23C-FF3C-FB1B1703FE9C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Nesiergus halophilus Benoit 1978
status

 

Nesiergus halophilus Benoit 1978 View in CoL

Figures 29–34 View FIGURES 29 – 34

Nesiergus insulanus: Hirst 1911: 383 View in CoL (Ψ). Misidentification.

Nesiergus halophilus Benoit 1978: 412 View in CoL , figs. 4a–e (D♂Ψ); Smith 1990: 133, figs. 861–877 (♂Ψ); Schmidt 1993: 57, figs. 31–32 (♂Ψ).

Material examined. Type material: Holotype Ψ ( MRAC 145439) from Frégate, Seychelles, 10.VIII.1972; Paratypes 1ɗ ( MRAC 143293), 2Ψ 1 imm. ( MRAC 143297) from Frégate, Seychelles, 10.VIII.1972; Paratypes 3Ψ, 3 imms. ( MRAC 143272) from Laraie Bay, Curieuse, Seychelles, 3 and 17.VIII.1972. All examined.

Additional material examined: 1Ψ, ( BMNH 10.5.1.4), from the Seychelles, Percy Sladen Trust Expedition leg.

Diagnosis: Males differ from those of N. gardineri by the presence of a distinct embolic keel ( Figs. 30– 32 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ), by the prolateral branch of the tibial apophysis being wide and rounded ( Figs. 33 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ) and by metatarsus IV being curved laterally. Females differ from those of N. gardineri by spermathecal morphology ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ).

Note: very likely to be a junior synonym of N. insulanus ; however the species should remain valid pending examination of additional material.

Description: Female (holotype). Total length 13.6. Carapace length 5.2, width 3.7. Eye tubercle: length 0.8, width 1.0; anterior row procurved, posterior row slightly recurved, clypeus absent. Labium length 0.7, width 1.0. Sternum length 2.2, width 2.2. Chelicerae with 8 teeth of similar size on promargin. Labium as long as wide with ca.50 cuspules. Maxillae with ca. 60 cuspules. Sternum rounded. Fovea transverse. Palp: femur 2.6/ patella 1.8/ tibia 1.6/ tarsus 1.7/ total 7.7. Legs I: femur 3.8/ patella 2.5/ tibia 2.7/ metatarsus 2.2/ tarsus 1.6/ total 12.8. II: 3.2/ 2.2/ 2.1/ 2.0/ 1.3/ 10.8. III: 2.8/ 1.7/ 1.6/ 2.2/ 1.5/ 9.8. IV: 4.2/ 2.2/ 3.2/ 3.6/ 1.9/ 15.1. Spines. Palpal and leg femora with medial row of thick setae. Palp: tibia (v) 0–0–ap1. Legs I: metatarsus (v) 0–0–ap 1. II: metatarsus (v) 0–0–ap 1. III: patella (p) 1, tibia (r) 1–1–0, (p) 0–2–0, (v) 2–0–ap2, metatarsus (r) 0–1–1, (p) 0–2–1, (v) 2–0ap 3. IV: tibia (r) 1–1–0, (v) 2–0–ap3, metatarsus (r) 0–1–1, (p) 0–1–1, (v) 1–3–ap3. Spermathecae comprising two receptacula, each longer than wide and broader than in N. insulanus ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ). Metatarsal scopulae extent (ventral surfaces only): I–II along entire length; III on slightly less than distal half; IV on distal third. Tarsal scopulae (ventral surfaces only): I–II undivided; III–IV divided by longitudinal band of thick setae.

Male (paratype MRAC 143.293). Total length 17.0. Carapace length 7.2, width 5.2. Eye tubercle length 0.9, width 1.1; anterior row procurved, posterior row slightly recurved, clypeus absent. Labium length 0.7, width 1.1. Sternum length 2.9, width 2.6. Chelicerae with 10–12 teeth of similar size on promargin. Labium as long as wide with ca. 50 cuspules. Maxillae with ca. 60 cuspules. Sternum rounded. Fovea transverse. Palp: femur 3.6/ patella 2.3/ tibia 2.7/ cymbium 1.4/ total 10.0. Legs I: femur 5.6/ patella 3.8/ tibia 5.1/ metatarsus 4.6/ tarsus 3.0/ total 22.1. II: 5.1/ 3.3/ 4.1/ 4.7/ 3.0/ 20.2. III: 4.9/ 2.6/ 3.3/ 5.1/ 2.7/ 18.6. IV: 6.3/ 2.9/ 5.1/ 5.4/ 3.1/ 22.8. Spines. Palpal and leg femora with medial row of thick setae. Palp without spines. Legs I: femur (d) 0–0–2, tibia (p) 0–1–1, (v) 0–1–0, metatarsus (v) ap 1. II: femur (d) 0–1–1, patella (p) 1, tibia (p) 0–1–1, (v) 1– 0–ap2, metatarsus (v) 1–0–ap 2. III: femur (d) 0–2–2, patella (p) 1, (r) 1, tibia (p) 1–1–0, (r) 1–1–0, (v) 2–2– ap3, metatarsus (p) 0–1–1, (r) 0–1–1, (v) 4–2–ap 3. IV: femur (d) 0–2–2, (r) 1, tibia (p) 1–1–0, (r) 1–1–0, (v) 3–3–ap3, metatarsus (p) 1–1–1, (r) 1–1–1, (v) 3–3–ap3. Palpal bulb with tapering embolus, slightly spiralled, bearing keel along embolus ( Figs. 30–32 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ). Tibial apophysis comprising two branches, strongly fused basally ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 29 – 34 ). Prolateral branch short, wide, apically rounded, with adjacent strong, short spine. Retrolateral branch long, thin, with apical row of 5–6 short spines, and short curved spine on inner side. Metatarsus I straight, bends externally to tibial apophysis. Metatarsi I–IV laterally curved. Metatarsal scopulae extent (ventral surfaces only): I along entire length; II on distal three-quarters; III on distal half; IV on distal quarter. Tarsal scopulae (ventral surfaces only): I–II undivided; III–IV divided by longitudinal band of thick setae.

Distribution: Known from Frégate, Silhouette, Récif and Curieuse, Seychelles.

Ecology: Spiders inhabit sandy beaches where they construct vertical burrows in the sand, beneath rocks and coral fragments. The burrows were situated just above the mean spring tide level, at the upper limit of the crab-hole zone ( Benoit 1978). Males are mature in August.

MRAC

Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Theraphosidae

Genus

Nesiergus

Loc

Nesiergus halophilus Benoit 1978

Guadanucci, José Paulo L. & Gallon, Richard C. 2008
2008
Loc

Nesiergus halophilus

Schmidt 1993: 57
Smith 1990: 133
Benoit 1978: 412
1978
Loc

Nesiergus insulanus:

Hirst 1911: 383
1911
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF