Metagonia guianesa Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14371466 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C22A01AC-C7D8-48A6-B50D-21986D8035D1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C22A01AC-C7D8-48A6-B50D-21986D8035D1 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Metagonia guianesa Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Metagonia guianesa Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C22A01AC-C7D8-48A6-B50D-21986D8035D1
Figs 646–649 View Figs 646–649 , 654–656 View Figs 650–656 , 1052
Metagonia Ven View in CoL 54 – Eberle et al. 2018 (molecular data). — Huber et al. 2018: 71.
Diagnosis
Distinguished from most congeners by unmodified male chelicerae, by modifications of male clypeus ( Fig. 648 View Figs 646–649 ; two pairs of light rounded processes at rim), and by female internal genitalia ( Figs 649 View Figs 646–649 , 655– 656 View Figs 650–656 ; elongate median receptacle). From a very similar closely related undescribed relative from Brazil (“ M. Br16-216” in Eberle et al. 2018; Huber et al. 2018) by minor details of procursus and clypeus shape.
Etymology
The species name refers to the type locality of this species in the Guiana Highlands; adjective.
Type material VENEZUELA – Bolívar • ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 22018), at km 109 from El Dorado (6.013° N, 61.391° W), ~ 800 m a.s.l., 3 Dec. 2002 (B.A. Huber). GoogleMaps
Other material examined
VENEZUELA – Bolívar • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 22019), 1 ♀, 13 juvs in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven 02/100-54), same collection data as for holotype GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 22020), at km 102 from El Dorado (6.063° N, 61.400° W), ~ 500 m a.s.l., 2 Dec. 2002 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.7, carapace width 0.87. Distance PME–PME 135 µm; diameter PME 90 µm; distance PME–ALE 15 µm; AME absent. Leg 1: 27.9 (6.8+0.4 +6.6+ 12.4 +1.7), legs 2 and 4 missing, tibia 3: 2.7; tibia 1 L/d: 73.
COLOR (in ethanol). Entire prosoma pale ochre-yellow to whitish; legs ochre-yellow, with darker (brown to black) patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen monochromous whitish.
BODY. Habitus as in Brazilian Metagonia ‘Br16-216’ (cf. Fig. 644 View Figs 640–645 ). Ocular area barely raised. Carapace without thoracic groove. Clypeus with two pairs of light rounded processes at rim ( Fig. 648 View Figs 646–649 ). Sternum slightly wider than long (0.58/0.50), unmodified. Abdomen elongate, dorsally projecting beyond spinnerets.
CHELICERAE. Unmodified (except indistinct widening proximally laterally; Fig. 648 View Figs 646–649 ).
PALPS. As in Figs 646–647 View Figs 646–649 ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with rounded retrolateral ventral apophysis; femur with pair of low ventral humps; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia in very distal position; procursus with simple pale ventral hinged process, main branch divided distally into retrolateral and prolateral sclerites connected by complex membranous elements; retrolateral part distinctively bent toward ventral, prolateral part with short subdistal branch; genital bulb with indistinct dorsal coneshaped hump, embolus simple, with distal spine.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 8%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with>20 pseudosegments, poorly visible in dissecting microscope.
Male (variation)
Legs 1 missing in second male.
Female
In general similar to male (cf. Fig. 645 View Figs 640–645 ). Tibia 1 in five females: 5.3–5.7 (mean 5.5). Epigynum ( Fig. 654 View Figs 650–656 ) unsclerotized simple plate, with small knob-shaped structure at posterior rim, internal receptacle visible in uncleared specimens. Internal genitalia ( Figs 649 View Figs 646–649 , 655–656 View Figs 650–656 ) apparently symmetric, with elongate median receptacle, small pore plates far apart.
Distribution
Known from two neighboring localities in the Venezuelan state Bolívar (Fig. 1052).
Natural history
All specimens were collected from the undersides of leaves.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.